Bad solar advice - what is the real impact?

Submitted: Wednesday, Mar 05, 2008 at 21:49
ThreadID: 55231 Views:4920 Replies:9 FollowUps:13
This Thread has been Archived
Looks like I've received some bum advice, and I want to understand the real impact.

I have now purchased, and am halfway through installing, 2 Uni-solar 62T panels to mount on the roof of my pop-top troopie camper. I chose this model due to ability to flush mount (no controller box) so I can still get her in the garage, physical dimensions (2 X 64W wouldn't fit on roof), and durability.

But I've since discovered ....

"Uni-Solar’s ES-62t (62 watt) module produces 4.1 amps at 15.0 volts. As with most grid-interactive modules the ES- 62t appeals to motorhome builders as it is readily flush-mounted (i.e. there is no protruding connector box). But that 15.0 volts output is far too low for battery charging (most conventional solar modules produce up to 21 volts)." http://www.caravanandmotorhomebooks.com

I've already drilled some additional holes in the panel frames for mounting purposes, made the mounting rails and attached to the roof. I have only the wiring to complete. So I'm beyond a return.

I'm not particularly happy with the service I've received at present - given Collyns advice above, and if I've made a decision that is really bad, I'll consider taking it up with the retailer despite the holes. If the impacts are moderate, I'll probably just learn the lesson and move on.

So how bad is my situation? The plan was to mount the panels in parallel to aux battery (currently a sealed lead acid). I have an old 'yellow' 39L Engel and a few lights to run. I do want to be able to stay put and be able to keep the Fridge going.

Tim
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Sponsored Links