Wind deflector on roofrack
Submitted: Thursday, Mar 06, 2008 at 22:54
ThreadID:
55274
Views:
11166
Replies:
6
FollowUps:
4
This Thread has been Archived
Scubaroo
Just bought and fitted a second hand "Lowline" roofrack on my Pajero. At the front is a set of angled bars where a wind deflector is meant to fit - the original owner said he removed it as he didn't like it, but it wasn't clear why he didn't like it.
Do they make a difference to fuel economy when fitted? Noisewise, I can't hear any addition wind noise from the roofrack, empty, travelling at 100kmh - I haven't had a load up there yet to
test any noise when loaded. Is the wind deflector more useful when travelling with a load up top? Or just a placebo for people who think they need them?
I know semi trailers have them on top of the cab, but that's because there's a metre high flat facing trailer poking about the cab...
Reply By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Friday, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:04
Friday, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:04
I have a full length rack on my pajero.
It costs me 2 to 3l/100k in lost economy, depending how hard I push the speed. Big difference between 90 and 110 :O0
Was looking at fitting a deflector, since I noticed a lot of dead insects on the front of the rack when travelling.
But what I found worked best was moving the rack back a bit so it was behind the line of the windscreen by about 100mm. That way the air rising off the front of the car tended to go over the rack instead of hitting it. Reckon moving it made about 1l /100k difference.
At first I was tending to have the rack as forward as I could get it to distribute the load more evenly between front and back. Was nosier empty further forward too, so it must have been costing fuel.
AnswerID:
291361