Which 4X4 Dualcab?
Submitted: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 14:09
ThreadID:
57599
Views:
6465
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
15
This Thread has been Archived
Gingerbeer
Hi everyone, this is my first post on your sensatioinal website! Sorry for the long post but I'm full of questions.
I'm looking at getting a turbo diesel dualcab in a few months time and hoped you guys could help.
Firstly, is there much noticeable difference between the a 99' 2.8 TD rodeo compared to the 2002' 3.0 TD?
Is it worth the extra cash to get the 3.0TD?
Secondly, what are the 99' 2.5TD Courier and Bravos like compared to the 2.8TD rodeo?
I'm also keen to get a 95 Hilux Surf 3.0TD in the manual (I know its not a dualcab). How does the Toyota 3.0TD motor compare to the 2.8TD rodeo in power and fuel economy? At this stage the 3.0TD Hilux dualcab is too expensive, but the surf is within price range.
At this stage I'm leaning towards the 99' Rodeo in 2.8TD manual. Are there any common problems with this model?
Reply By: Kumunara (NT) - Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 22:03
Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 22:03
Gingerbeer
We have all different needs when it comes to vehicles and different body sizes that make one
seat comfortable and another not.
I have driven Rodeos due to my previous occupation in SA. In 2004 the Rodeo we had was replaced with a new one. I found the seats extremely uncomfortable and within a few months I suffered a large amount of back pain.
Test drive as many 4WDs as you can and if you don't find the seating comfortable don't purchase it.
The Rodeo has a very soft front end and very poor handling. All four wheel drives tend to have a tendency to roll over and handling is very important for your own safety. The hi-lux has a reputation which has earnt it the nick name hi-roller. As there are a lot of them on the road is this due to the vehicle or driver error?
I have spoken to a lot of Triton drivers who like the vehicle. I cannot comment as I have never driven one. Take one for a
test drive.
I tried to take a Navara for a
test drive. I decided that it wasn't worth decapitating myself to fit in the vehicle. The head room in the Courier/Ranger/Bravo is not much better.
Tjilpi
AnswerID:
303838
Follow Up By: Best Off Road - Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 19:54
Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 19:54
How tall are you?
I'm a Collingwood six footer and could get into my Courier in a Top Hat.
Jim.
FollowupID:
570067
Follow Up By: Kumunara (NT) - Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 20:17
Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 20:17
Jim
I am 190 cms but a bit of a different build.
I have short legs and arms for my height and a long large torso.
That is why I weigh in at about 130 kg and have difficulty fitting in a lot of vehicles.
I have to take the headrest off some seats because they poke into my shoulders.
Tjilpi
FollowupID:
570074
Follow Up By: Best Off Road - Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 20:44
Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 20:44
I understand, you're one big bloke.
Hey, great Barra in your rig
pic. Bit of a baby compared to what I used to catch when I lived in
Townsville....wank wank wank.
Great fish, never had the pleasure of landing a ripper like that. Good eating at that size no doubt, or do you catch so many that you release them?
Jim.
FollowupID:
570084
Follow Up By: Kumunara (NT) - Friday, May 16, 2008 at 20:39
Friday, May 16, 2008 at 20:39
Jim
The fish in the picture was 82 cms. That is small compared to a lot caught up here.
Unfortunately I am not much of a fisherman and only catch fish that are commiting suicide.
I take the better half with me and that way get enough for a feed.
Tjilpi
FollowupID:
570293
Reply By: Member - AJB (VIC) - Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 22:43
Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 22:43
Cant comment on 99 Rodeo but had a 92 dual cab 2.8 TD, actually traded it in 99! Anyway I would describe it as almost bulletproof! We took it around Australia and it performed faultlessly. Worked it extremely hard in the NW of WA and it kept coming back for more. I had a few oil leaks, replaced the clutch at 180,000 kms, replaced a rear wheel bearing, put some new shockers and better rear leaf springs and apart from usual servicing, that was it. Fuel usage was about 10kms per litre from day one until I traded it. It did about 250,000 when I got rid of it but would have done another 250,000 I reckon. It did 60,000 while living on the edge of the
Great Sandy Desert running up and down the Tanami road and around the top of the Canning etc! Then it did another 70,000 around Fitzroy and
Derby and up and down the
Gibb River Road and minesites etc. Looking through photo albums we see it and get kind of glassy eyed! Simple reliable engine. No high tech stuff. Modest power but at the time, early 90's, it was the leader in the power stakes in its class.
They were a great vehicle and better than the 4WD I have now. Someone will say otherwise and have a horror story. I serviced it fastidiously, as I do with all my cars, bikes etc, so that may have been the key. It didn't work with the GU though!
AnswerID:
303849
Reply By: Best Off Road - Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 19:58
Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 19:58
Are you dead set on a diesel?
Depending on where you are, and the availability and cost of LPG, you'd do
well with a Petrol and fit LPG.
Heaps more power and lower running costs.
Disclaimer: LPG is not available in some remote locations and may not be so cost effective in the boonies.
Jim.
AnswerID:
303989
Follow Up By: Gingerbeer - Friday, May 16, 2008 at 12:03
Friday, May 16, 2008 at 12:03
I were originally keen on the 4runner 3L petrol. Mainly because you can mount the cylinder under the chassis and then put your spare on a tailgate.
I worked out that LPG was cheaper but would lack the grunt and torque of the toyota 3.0TD (hence my interest in the turbo diesel surf)
I've now pointed towards the Rodeo because its good on fuel and lighter weight than the surf.
I assumed: (Petrol=$1.50/L) (Diesel=$1.75/L) (LPG=$0.80/L)
-3L petrol 4runner = 14.5L/100km = $21.75/100km
-3L LGP 4runner = 18.9L/100km (30% more fuel cons.) = $15.08/100km
-3L Surf turbo diesel = 12L/100km = $21/100km
-2.8L Rodeo Dualcab = 9L/100km = $15.75/100km
Hence the Rodeo should be just as cheap (not including service costs)
Plus I'd prefer a dualcab oiler.
I'd assume the Turbo Diesel Bravo/Courier would have similar fuel consumption?
FollowupID:
570186
Reply By: Gingerbeer - Friday, May 16, 2008 at 12:17
Friday, May 16, 2008 at 12:17
To be honest, the only reason I want the dualcab is to put my KTM450 in the back.
In saying this, the bike only fits if the tailgate is down and its a ba$tard to get in and out. So I'm keeping my options open as its easier to put my bike in a trailer.
The dualcab option looks good for fishing, camping, shooting, getting stumps ect. but doesnt have the security unless you have a lockable tray cover.
So its probably going to come down to vehicle cost, availability at the time, and fuel cost.
I'm trying to keep it under $15,000.
AnswerID:
304121