Fuel Saving Device

Hiclone or futch?

Theres also some magnet technology coming to Australia from Uk called ECOFLOW or something i recently purchased one and fitted it on the fuel line. Apparently seperates the fuel allowing it to burn much more efficiently. So i'll see how that goes. Testing done in the UK seems to say it was successful.
Heard also that the same thing was actually used on the Spitfires in WW2 to make them use the fuel more efficiently.

Got a 90 day money back guarentee with it as well.

No they dont work, and it dosent mater how much we believe or would like them to work... "yah canna change the laws of physics"

The problem with IC (internal combustion) engines is not that they dont burn fuel efiecently. They do around 98 to 99%. The problem is most of the energy produced, around 70%, is wasted as heat.

Magnets, catylists, hyclones are all snake oil are im afraid.

The best magnet device is to use it to erase the magnetic strip on your eftpos and credit cards. It'll stop you buying rubbish fuel saving devices.

A little reading here....
http://www.fuelsaving.info/index.htm

If any of these devices were any good the car manufacture would fit them from new , it makes their car easier to sell if it uses less fuel . What usually happens is the car goes in for a service and tune up and the " device " is fitted , the car runs better and uses less fuel because of the tune up , not the " bits " added on .

Fuel "saving" devices, and why you should avoid them

Almost since the car was invented, people have been offering miracle devices that allegedly give greatly improved fuel consumption. None have ever been rigorously proved to give worthwhile savings, yet hundreds of products of this type are still widely sold - especially on the Internet, where they are free from regulation. As a professional automotive engineer with many years' experience developing improved-economy engines, I have become increasingly annoyed by the half-truths and sometimes downright lies told by many makers and sellers of such devices, to part customers from their hard-earned cash. This section explains the engineering reality behind the claims.
Regards
dedabatoImage Could Not Be Found

I saw that - YES it does WORK and best of all it costs LESS than 5c
it is a peice of string, instructions are
1) tie end to accelarator
2) tie other end to left testicle
3) enjoy fuel savings

While studys did find it worked it seemed it only had a fuel svaing effec for 1/2 the people tested

Well im going to give it a go anyway. If it doesn't work then i get my money back. However these have been tested at the english testing site and have proven to give up to 20% saving. If you guys aren't willing to try and have an open mind its not my problem.

Trekkie
If anything I like your choice of radio station , best in Perth eh.
Was good too when Liam Bartlett was doing the morning show.

.

Even the late great Peter Brock got sucked into promoting (in a BIG way) a "Fuel Ioniser" that was alleged to align the fuel molecules and thus improve fuel economy, power and response to throttle.

Needless to say, it didn't work and the whole issue did little for his reputation.

As others have said on more than one occasion (with reference to this issue), "A fool and his money are so easily parted."

Again "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably isn't"

Disco.

Trekkie,

It wasnt Fuelmate by any chance was it.

It supposedly uses the same technology that the Spitfires used in Russia during the second world war.

Dont know much more than that, and have no association with them.

Cheers,

Cruiser

Peter Brocks was an energy polarizer but the results were the same all claims no proof