Thursday, May 29, 2008 at 13:01
I was reading the 4wd monthly used 4x4 buyers guide. They did include most of the "soft roader" models in there but generally stated why they don't make good 4x4's (like real four wheel driving - not just all wearther roads etc).
Anyway bit of a summary for you on what they said:
KLUGER
Pluses
*Build Quality
*Resale Value
*Running Costs
Minuses
*Off-road ability
*On road Handling
*Third Row Seats
They reckon the Kluger is somewhere between the soft-roader RAV4 and a on-roader Camry which makes it's rightful place anywhere but off road. Traction control doesn't work properly because stability control cancels it out.
RAV4 Series 1 & 2
Pluses
*Build Quality
*Full-Time 4wd
*Variant range
Minuses
*Off-road ability
*Acceleration (2.0 4door wagon)
* Four Speed Automatic
They say it has short travel
suspension (don't all soft roaders!), and no low range gearing, no traction aids (center diff lock, lsd etc) and no underbody protection. They reckon it's great for all weather roads but not for off road with too many corrugations and potholes. They did also say about the only thing it had going for it in common with bigger 4x4s is the full time AWD 50:50 and tailgate mounted rear.
As you can tell being a fourby mag they are pretty against the soft roaders - but they have a point, they aren't suitable for what the bigger cars are, just depends what you plan to use it for . As far as I can tell they are refering to 2003 models or older (used cars after all). If I was to go by their review I'd pick the Rav4.
We have recently brought a Subaru Forester (XS model). Just picked it up yesterday. From what I can see some things it has going for it is AWD (50:50), Low Range, center diff with LSD. Seems to be the better pick of the bunch. So far all I can say is that it's much much more enjoyable to drive compared to the old 80 series. Yes no raw power that we had from the 6.5L chev, but handling and control of the car is superb. So far feels very good on the gravel too (our road is gravel as is the driveway etc).
For the Forester:
Pluses
*Buld Quality
*On-Road Performance (I can vouch for that)
*Features
Minuses
*Dak-dak' engine note (like a VW beetle) - lol I haven't noticed, the road noise from the tires is louder!
*Pricey
They reckon it's good as a dirt road tourer. They don't think the low range was that noticeable compared to high range due to reduction gearing ratio. And once again not enough
suspension travel for serious off road stuff (I would agree). Of course not sure how many changes since 2003.
AnswerID:
306487