Monday, Jun 16, 2008 at 20:46
Why would this be so Mike.
It is just a fact that some equipment is built better than others.
The FT747 suffered from plug in vertical circuit boards that would punch through the mating circuit board on the contact pins. This was on the local oscillator & crystal filter boards. Also dry joints in the PA stage, crook band pass filter relay contacts....
The FT 100 was a dog from day 1. Deaf as a post, went back under warranty on immediate return from a trip into the Simpson (only 3 weeks old) and 4 months latter I took it back again & requested a full refund - which was done with no problems & bought the Icom.
I have 2 x Electrophone TX4000 radios arond 17 years old that, apart from display lights, work
well.
So what does this mean?
That cost does not necessarily imply quality.
That a purpose designed and built item will be more reliable than one which is more of a compromise - in this case when used in harsh terrain. ie the Military spec design on my FT1500m...
Dare I say that some equipment may be put onto the market without adequate testing - a bit like certain computer operating systems.
That the UHF CB, based on volumes of sales, must be pretty
well constructed as the bush is not knee deep with dead ones.
Off on the Anne Beadell & Connie Sue Hwys next month, will see how everything holds up with the reported corrugations.
Cheers, Tony.
FollowupID:
576403