Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 00:10
Christian
There seem to be two main systems on the market, Dgas and Dieselgas Australia.
I decided on the D-gas system for a couple of reasons.
1) It was a far more simple system than the Dieselgas Australia system
2) The guys I spoke to were more than willing to spend the time explaining their system, while not writing off the competition.
3) Price. Probably the least important reason but the D-gas system came in at the time about $600 less expensive.
Now having had it for almost 12 months, I do have some opinions.
Mine was one of the very early D-gas systems installed. It was actually installed here in
Perth by the guys who designed and developed the system. Last week it went in for a replacement of the heat exchanger that the gas runs through as it was leaking
water quite badly. The developers no longer do the installs as they are flat out producing the equipment, so I was directed to another company close by for the warrranty work. This was handled with no fuss at all and at very short notice as we are doing a 6 week trip around WA leaving on July 26th, so as you can imagine there is still plenty to do to the vehicle before we head off.
The original system was some kind of polyester piping I believe which has now gone to mainly brass which will be so much better.
If you are looking at the system from a purely economy viewpoint, you will most likely be dissapointed. You do definitelty pick up 20% - 30% increase in power which is very very noticeable when towing the camper. Where you do win on the economy scale is in the overall cost of fuel / litre. I have kept a spreadsheet of my most recent fuel tracking and costings which shows you the diesel price, gas price and then the combined price per litre, which actually comes in less than the current unleaded price.
So you really dont get better economy as such, but your overall fuel cost definitely is reduced, to the point where I estimate that my install has paid for itself within the first year (keeping in mind that here in WA we get a $3000 rebate back on the install)
The D-gas system is very simple being pressure controlled and the gas is injected post turbo as opposed to the Dieselgas Australia solution which has to be tuned across the rev range with a computer and is injected pre turbo. Based on this I was much more comfortable with the D-gas system overall.
Just my observations, hope it helps you some.
AnswerID:
315054
Follow Up By: PeterInSa - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:39
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:39
Richard,
Any thoughts on the impact of Dgas on your engine. The reason I ask is that I understand that standard Diesels can do over 500,000km without the engine being overhauled, but Turbo Diesels around 350,000km will Diesel/Gas reduces this figure further.
Peter
FollowupID:
581205
Follow Up By: Member - RFLundgren (WA) - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:19
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:19
Peter
I dont believe that the systems have been around long enough to judge as yet. Many trucks are now running gas fumigation systems, and if all is not right, they certainly have much more to loose cost wise I think.
From what I have read it is actually supposed to be much better for your engine overall, keeping the oil cleaner with less build up of stuff internally due to the more complete diesel burn.
Mine has done almost 180,000 kms now, probably about 30,000 of that with the gas installed. No issues thus far, and you can definitely notice the power increase, quieter and smoother running of the motor and cleaner oil between changes.
All in all I am happy and not particularly concerned about engine life at this stage.
FollowupID:
581210
Follow Up By: Tasrat - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:22
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:22
I am thinking of going the same way for all the reasons not just economy. Richard am I right in thinking you have the 3.0ltd patrol as I do (2003 mod.)
These engines seem to a bit more fragile than most and all that extra power could be a worry. Thoughts ?
Cheers Paul
FollowupID:
581257
Follow Up By: Member - RFLundgren (WA) - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:54
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:54
Paul
Yes I do have the 3.0 litre (2003 model also). I am running my gas at about 25% or so, as it does vary by a few percent either way depending on how heavy you plant your foot. People continue to say how fragile the 3.0 litre Patrols are, but I am yet to experience any issues whatsoever so far. It still all comes down to good maintanance and sensible driving practices.
Yes granted they are not as strong as a 4.2, but they are also not receiving as much LPG as the 4.2 either. You will find with the Dgas system that they place a smaller nozzle to inject the gas. If I remember correctly
mine is 65 thou of an inch, and they did also supply me with a smaller one (either 50 or 55 thou from memory) if I ever did want to use less gas.
FollowupID:
581266
Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 19:33
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 19:33
Richard,
As far as longevity is concerned...... my 2000 GU Patrol had a 6.5 Chev transplanted when it was new and LPG fitted at the same time.
The motor has now done over 230,000klm and is running great. LPG is more likely to extend the longevity as it keeps the engine cleaner.
Having said that, I am just about to remove the system from my Patrol....trying to shed some weight. My LPG tank holds 70 litres, which I guess must weigh about 70 kgs, plus the tank itself would have to be about 50kg.
Cheers
Roachie
FollowupID:
581282