Diesel - Gas conversions
Submitted: Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 21:30
ThreadID:
59712
Views:
6795
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
14
This Thread has been Archived
Christian T
G'day all.
I know there has been much discusion about diesel - gas conversions, and from what I have read here and on other sites some love it and some think its a waste of time and money. Like many people I get away a fair bit and the price of diesel is killing me!
Has anyone had a 3.0 GU Patrol system fitted? If so I would be really interested in how you rate it.
Can anyone recommend a
melbourne based company to do the conversion and an estimate on what I would be up for.
I have heard prices ranging from $3500 to $4200. But I think it might depend on how high tech the system is.
Thanks for your help.
Christian.
Reply By: Member - Paul C (NSW) - Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 21:52
Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 21:52
I have toyed with this idea for some time.
Do your research.I have only heard of one company that is worth it.
Your price range above is about right as a starting point.
Don't do it if economy is your sole reason. Main advantage will be power increase with minimal. if any, savings.
Others should have more to offer.
Paul
AnswerID:
315033
Reply By: PeterInSa - Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 22:28
Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 22:28
Paul,
I am seriously looking at Diesel/LPG on my TD LC towing a 21'6" van.
My thinking is that if LPG gives a 30% power increase (and claimed 30% economy increase) it should be worthwhile. With a 30% power increase I should not have to put my foot down so far which should in theory give me the economy.
However the best power band for my cruiser/van is around 95kph at XRPM so with the Lpg, this could alter the speed/RPM powerband equation and so the economy.
Christian, I understand that there are a number of LPG systems out there, some are a lot more computerised than others, I am looking at a non computerised system. Do not want any problems out in the bush as some of the computerised systems have to be tuned with a program in a laptop. This type of equipment and skills are in short supply out of the capital cities.
I think you are right to ask about the 3Lt Patrol I recall reading on a
Forum cannot recall which one, that LPG on this engine was not recommended. You should definetly follow this up on the Patrol
Forum where you will probably find 3Lt owners have LPG fitted on their TD's, if there isn't any on this
forum.
Comments appreciated
Peter
AnswerID:
315036
Follow Up By: wigger - Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 23:02
Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 23:02
Peter, can you clarify a point. You say"if LPG gives a 30% power increase....."
Lpg has a lower calorific value per litre than petrol, so that's why you use a greater no of litres than petrol to cover any given distance.
Diesel has a higher calorific value than petrol so.........
So how can LPG give a 30% power increase unless a much larger volume is being pumped in to the engine? You can't get a power increase AND an economy benefit.
But i could be RONG RONG RONG
FollowupID:
581156
Follow Up By: PeterInSa - Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 23:56
Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 23:56
Wigger
My understanding is that my engine will go thru 75Lt Diesel tank and a 25Lt LPG tank at the same time ie for every Lt of Diesel it will use 1/3 Lt of LPG. The LPG is sucked into the combustion chamber along with the Diesel to give a bigger bang, ie the combustion is from a combination of Diesel and LPG not just Diesel to give the bigger bang.
I am not sure whether the air is reduced to allow for the LPG volume.
Another way of looking at it could be on a cool night air seems to make my diesel go better probably because the air is denser. The reason most TD's are fitted with air scoops and air coolers (forgotton the technical term its late).
The adds for these systems claim power and economy benefits, so do some users who have installed them.
FollowupID:
581166
Follow Up By: Grungle - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:08
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:08
Wigger,
Replacing come the inducted air with LPG results in more energy being created due to a better and more complete combustion.
Same principle as Nitrous on Pertrol cars.
Regards
David
FollowupID:
581187
Follow Up By: wigger - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 19:12
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 19:12
Thanks P & G,
I think RFL (see below)has expressed it very
well when he says
"If you are looking at the system from a purely economy viewpoint, you will most likely be dissapointed. You do definitelty pick up 20% - 30% increase in power which is very very noticeable when towing the camper. Where you do win on the economy scale is in the overall cost of fuel / litre. I have kept a spreadsheet of my most recent fuel tracking and costings which shows you the diesel price, gas price and then the combined price per litre, which actually comes in less than the current unleaded price.
So you really dont get better economy as such, but your overall fuel cost definitely is reduced
FollowupID:
581276
Reply By: Member - RFLundgren (WA) - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 00:10
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 00:10
Christian
There seem to be two main systems on the market, Dgas and Dieselgas Australia.
I decided on the D-gas system for a couple of reasons.
1) It was a far more simple system than the Dieselgas Australia system
2) The guys I spoke to were more than willing to spend the time explaining their system, while not writing off the competition.
3) Price. Probably the least important reason but the D-gas system came in at the time about $600 less expensive.
Now having had it for almost 12 months, I do have some opinions.
Mine was one of the very early D-gas systems installed. It was actually installed here in
Perth by the guys who designed and developed the system. Last week it went in for a replacement of the heat exchanger that the gas runs through as it was leaking water quite badly. The developers no longer do the installs as they are flat out producing the equipment, so I was directed to another company close by for the warrranty work. This was handled with no fuss at all and at very short notice as we are doing a 6 week trip around WA leaving on July 26th, so as you can imagine there is still plenty to do to the vehicle before we head off.
The original system was some kind of polyester piping I believe which has now gone to mainly brass which will be so much better.
If you are looking at the system from a purely economy viewpoint, you will most likely be dissapointed. You do definitelty pick up 20% - 30% increase in power which is very very noticeable when towing the camper. Where you do win on the economy scale is in the overall cost of fuel / litre. I have kept a spreadsheet of my most recent fuel tracking and costings which shows you the diesel price, gas price and then the combined price per litre, which actually comes in less than the current unleaded price.
So you really dont get better economy as such, but your overall fuel cost definitely is reduced, to the point where I estimate that my install has paid for itself within the first year (keeping in mind that here in WA we get a $3000 rebate back on the install)
The D-gas system is very simple being pressure controlled and the gas is injected post turbo as opposed to the Dieselgas Australia solution which has to be tuned across the rev range with a computer and is injected pre turbo. Based on this I was much more comfortable with the D-gas system overall.
Just my observations, hope it helps you some.
AnswerID:
315054
Follow Up By: PeterInSa - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:39
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:39
Richard,
Any thoughts on the impact of Dgas on your engine. The reason I ask is that I understand that standard Diesels can do over 500,000km without the engine being overhauled, but Turbo Diesels around 350,000km will Diesel/Gas reduces this figure further.
Peter
FollowupID:
581205
Follow Up By: Member - RFLundgren (WA) - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:19
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:19
Peter
I dont believe that the systems have been around long enough to judge as yet. Many trucks are now running gas fumigation systems, and if all is not right, they certainly have much more to loose cost wise I think.
From what I have read it is actually supposed to be much better for your engine overall, keeping the oil cleaner with less build up of stuff internally due to the more complete diesel burn.
Mine has done almost 180,000 kms now, probably about 30,000 of that with the gas installed. No issues thus far, and you can definitely notice the power increase, quieter and smoother running of the motor and cleaner oil between changes.
All in all I am happy and not particularly concerned about engine life at this stage.
FollowupID:
581210
Follow Up By: Tasrat - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:22
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:22
I am thinking of going the same way for all the reasons not just economy. Richard am I right in thinking you have the 3.0ltd patrol as I do (2003 mod.)
These engines seem to a bit more fragile than most and all that extra power could be a worry. Thoughts ?
Cheers Paul
FollowupID:
581257
Follow Up By: Member - RFLundgren (WA) - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:54
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:54
Paul
Yes I do have the 3.0 litre (2003 model also). I am running my gas at about 25% or so, as it does vary by a few percent either way depending on how heavy you plant your foot. People continue to say how fragile the 3.0 litre Patrols are, but I am yet to experience any issues whatsoever so far. It still all comes down to good maintanance and sensible driving practices.
Yes granted they are not as strong as a 4.2, but they are also not receiving as much LPG as the 4.2 either. You will find with the Dgas system that they place a smaller nozzle to inject the gas. If I remember correctly
mine is 65 thou of an inch, and they did also supply me with a smaller one (either 50 or 55 thou from memory) if I ever did want to use less gas.
FollowupID:
581266
Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 19:33
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 19:33
Richard,
As far as longevity is concerned...... my 2000 GU Patrol had a 6.5 Chev transplanted when it was new and LPG fitted at the same time.
The motor has now done over 230,000klm and is running great. LPG is more likely to extend the longevity as it keeps the engine cleaner.
Having said that, I am just about to remove the system from my Patrol....trying to shed some weight. My LPG tank holds 70 litres, which I guess must weigh about 70 kgs, plus the tank itself would have to be about 50kg.
Cheers
Roachie
FollowupID:
581282
Reply By: Wilson - Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:46
Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 17:46
Hi Christian,
My 4.2TD GU is due back tomorow from a fit up with the D-Gas system. The work is being completed in
Melbourne by Smithy's Gas in Barry Street BAYSWATER. Although the job is not yet complete, so far, thier service has been excellent. I spoke with Terry who was very helpful on the phone, the next day he sent out a full written quotation plus more
information on the system and expected results from the install and a money back guarantee. I have been delayed one day (one weekend) and they rang and apologised, described the hold up clearly and kept me in
the loop. The cost for the 4.2 was at the higher end of the figures you posted, less the federal rebate and of course, no rebate from the wonderful, I mean woefull Vic state Gov't. I would recommend giving them a call for info. As a
Perth Expat, I originally spoke with DGas in
Perth and they recommended Smithys as one of two experienced fitters in Melb.. Regards
AnswerID:
315126
Reply By: Nic I (NSW) - Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 15:46
Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 15:46
Hi,
Has anybody, especially those with 3L Patrols, any experience with the Ecoshot diesel gas system ?
There are many of these systems on the market, but this one seems to be very simple, made up of only mechanical components - no electronics. It's also, and perhaps rightly so, one of the cheaper ones.
Cheers,
Nic
AnswerID:
315267
Follow Up By: Member - Paul C (NSW) - Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 17:33
Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 17:33
I wouldn't touch it.
Gas injection in diesels is a fine art. It needs to be tailored to suit the vehicle and the best way to do this is with electronically controlled injection.
I remember reading about Ecoshot somewhere (maybe delica
forum) and it appears the same as many other wonder cures/systems. Its simplicity supposedly makes it a better alternative.
For Diesels, simplicity is generally OK.
For Diesel Gas injection, simplicity spells a world of heartache or unmetered results, if any.
Just my opinion based on negative
feedback.
paul
FollowupID:
581409
Reply By: Christian T - Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 16:31
Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 16:31
Wow! This is the first time I have posted a thread on Exploroz
and I was blown away by the number of people that are interseted enough to give their 2c worth. Thanks heaps.
Richard sounds like the guru when it comes to this stuff and the simple d-gas system sounds the way to go.
I recently sold a '92 TD 80 series and after owning a new d40 TD Navara for a very short time (big mistake buying that thing!) I did my homework and a lot of research and decided on a 3.0 GU patrol as my next 4WD that will hopeful last me 10 or more years.
They do have a bad reputation, and taking that into consideration I can understand why some people would recommend against puting the 3.0 GU on gas. However, unless there is a factual mechanical reason for not doing it, I think I would be pretty much sold on doing it now.
I will give the mob at Bayswater a call. They sound top notch and as I live in
Croydon it couldn't be any closer!
Thanks again.
AnswerID:
315271
Follow Up By: Member - RFLundgren (WA) - Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 16:41
Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 16:41
Christian
Yes the 3.0 litre Patrols do have a bad reputation. Whether it is deserved of not is another question.
Mine is a 3003 series III as is yours, so we should be out of the danger zone.
I know many people will tell you they will blowup or whatever, but just remember for every 1 that goes bang there are 100's or 1000's that havent.
What can you do? Each to his own I guess. I know that i am extremely happy with
mine and all things being equal, with regular and good service it will last me many years to come yet.
I have a pajero prior to the Patrol which I had for 7 years and put 420,000 on the clock. it was bought off my by my mechanic and was still a brilliant vehicle. I can only hope the Patrol serves me just as
well. :)
FollowupID:
581405
Reply By: Christian T - Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 19:18
Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 19:18
I just spoke to a guy who fits ECO SHOT in
Melbourne.
They do seem cheaper, but the things that concern me are;
1. The gas is delivered 6" prior to the turbo. This worries me as everybody knows gas dries out valves etc in petrol/gas cars and what would this do to my turbo over time, which is hot and spinning at high speed?
2. The gas is in vapour form (I believe in the tank - I dont know how this is achieved though).
Eco shot claim that because the gas is a vapour, you use less.
From what I have read, this can be an issue in situations such as
hill climbs etc when the system that is designed for vapour is flooded by liquid gas.
DGAS apparently uses a controller that converts the liquid to a vapur just prior to it being 'injected' post turbo. Gas therefore doesn't go anywhere near your turbo.
It probably sounds like I'm selling Dgas and truth be told I am leaning that way, but still doing my homework. I thought it's worth sharing my thoughts. I can see quite a few of us going down the diesel gas path given the increasing price of fuel. Be stuffed if I'm ever going to sell my fourby and swap it for a Prius!........
AnswerID:
315304
Follow Up By: Member - RFLundgren (WA) - Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 23:57
Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 23:57
Christian
With the DGas system the gas runs through a heat exchanger to turn it from liquid to gas and is then injected post turbo. Only injects above 1500 RPM as
well, so youonly use it when you need it.
FollowupID:
581505
Reply By: Wilson - Tuesday, Jul 15, 2008 at 19:20
Tuesday, Jul 15, 2008 at 19:20
Hi all,
I just picked up my 4.2 from Smithys in Bayswater VIC after D-gas install. I have only driven from Bayswater to
home (about 20k's) but was astonished at the difference in power.. Rest assured, the claims made by D-gas are pretty close to the mark. Except at idle, the diesel chatter is almost completely gone, the car drives like a petrol motor, it cruises up hills without needing to change down a gear and it accelerates nicely. I have not seen any smoke from exhaust, although
mine ran pretty clean anyway. It will take a few months to establish if mileage is better, but at this point I have to say 'who cares', the power is great, however give it a few more diesel price increases and I will be keen to know.
The install is really nice, they tucked the unit out of the way, the piping is fantastic and its all brass etc. Very happy so far. The only thing annoying me so far, is I dont get $3000 rebate like in WA.... Vic Gov't is tooooo tight.. If you have spare few grand. DO IT!! (I am not affiliated in anyway to any gas fitting or LPG industry) Good Luck..
AnswerID:
315472
Reply By: Christian T - Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008 at 20:22
Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008 at 20:22
After a couple of days, I finally got onto Smithys in Bayswater that everyone is talking about.
The info that the provided me over the phone was good and was pretty what you guys have posted.
The only two issues I have now is,
There is a 4 - 5 week wait.
The total cost is $4400.
With the Govt rebate I will be out of pocket $2400. The only question is how long will it take me to pay that off? Somewhere around 2 - 3 years.
Its a fair bit of cash...
Is it just me, or did the cost of gas converstions creep up with the introduction of the the Govt rebate. I was of the belief that a few years ago you could get it done for half that price.....
Maybe I'm just a bit of a tight ar%e!
AnswerID:
315661
Follow Up By: Member - RFLundgren (WA) - Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008 at 20:49
Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008 at 20:49
I reckon you are correct as I think the cost has risen also. Luckily being in WA I managed to get $3000 back from a total cost of $4957 (including exhaust modifications)
Mine has paid for iteslf in less than a year so I am more than happy :)
FollowupID:
581848
Reply By: Christian T - Monday, Jul 21, 2008 at 19:32
Monday, Jul 21, 2008 at 19:32
If anyone who is interested in the conversion and is still reading...
I have contacted few different mobs in
Melbourne that do the conversions. The average seems to be about $4400.
After hearing about a few myths regarding the Ecoshot, I rang the Ecoshot people to dispell some of the myths that relate mainly to,
1) the issue of gas being fed through the turbo and any issues long term with that and,
2) Gas liquid (as opposed to vapour) being drawn from the tank on steep
hill climbs etc..
I was told that after all the conversions they have done which include many competition trucks, none have had any issues with fuel 'flooding' from the gas tank. I was told that you would have to drive up or down a 60 to 70 degree slope for this to be an issue.
In relation to the gas being injected through the turbo - The gas ration is something along the lines of 45:1 and therefore there is such little gas in the mix that there is no danger of combustion in the turbo or gas drying out bearings etc...
After all my research I am still undecided. The cost of fitting the Ecoshot is around $3500 plus about $150 to modify the exhaust. Regardless of what system I go with, I am leaning towatds a 2.5" to 3" exhaust while they are at it as it would probably only cost an extra couple hundred bucks to supply a new one, as opposed to modifying the original exhaust....
God love the internet for research.......
AnswerID:
316384