Forester vs X-Trail diesel
Submitted: Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 23:08
ThreadID:
64445
Views:
13115
Replies:
15
FollowUps:
15
This Thread has been Archived
BuggerBoggedAgain
Hi everyone and Merry Xmas
My wife and I are coming up to retirement, to hell with jonnys extra 5 yrs, I've had enough.
We have been researching over 7 months now and have narrowed it down to 2,
Subaru Forester petrol vs Nissan X-Trail diesel.
As this will be our last vehicle, it will be kept for as long as possible, 20 yrs maybe.
The only part we are worried about are servicing costs for such a time-frame. We do plan to travel around Aussie, 24,000 klms from new, then
home with the occasional trip in the Barrringtons.
We will not be towing, cheaper to stay in cabins.
What are your reccomendations as we have been driving the old corolla for 15 yrs now. Thanx for your advice in advance.
Reply By: Fiona & Paul - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 00:11
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 00:11
Compliments of the season to Everyone also
We have a 2005 Subaru Forester which I chose because it has high and low range, which for us as we tow a 980kg Magnum off road camper is arguably a stronger option. We have towed the Magnum for around 20,000km so far, it is a bit heavier on petrol and we are about to clock up our first 100,000km with the same brakes, spark plugs, service every 12,000km. The initial 100,000 service is $1,000 because of timing chain replacement.
We originally had a camper trailer at 680kg in tow for about 35,000km, loaded it weighed about 900kg with a 60 litre
water tank and extra petrol, so the Subaru does a great job for us.
At all times we have an advantage over diesel -v- petrol pricing and I can't argue the benefits of diesel now because the difference in cost is significant.
I run 8ply Yokohamas for quieter running on the black top, but will probably go for harder compund next time as tyre wear is just fair and that's all.
The major problem with the Subaru is the low entry and exit height when travelling off-road through sharp ditches, etc. Also the computer gear is fitted a bit low down behind the engine bay for river crossings and I am going to have that moved up higher by a Subaru mechanic who drives one himself.
I don't stop on steep hills at any time now as it gets a bit hard to take off when pulling 1200-1300kg behind us. I've heard the X-Trail has a bit more power but I don't know anymore than that.
We love the Subaru and like you I want to take it past the 500,000km mark if I can.
There are plenty of far more experienced 4WD experts on this site that can offer solid advice BuggerBoggedAgain, all I can do is re-tell of our experience. I assume from what I have read that Low Range on the Subaru is not geared quite low or high enough to give adequate speed control going down steep inclines, then again I wouldn't even dream of taking ours to
places where these guys and gals go - I'm a photographer.
Hope this bit helps & Merry Xmas to all.
Paul & Fiona
AnswerID:
340699
Follow Up By: BuggerBoggedAgain - Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 15:17
Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 15:17
Thanx Paul & Fi
Yep, have spoken to 2 mechs. up here and both said Forester, we won't be doing the hard yards either as we will be all in probability be on our own, but both of us will do a 4WD course and also have an emergency snatch kit, plus a hand-winch just in case
She who-is-never-wrong prefers forester
He who-is-never-right likes the X-Trail
So far Forester is winning, thanx heaps guys, just kidding
FollowupID:
608540
Reply By: Member - John F (NSW) - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 06:56
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 06:56
We've had a Subaru - WRX, not Forester, but similar quality - since 2001. Superb build quality and reliability.
Google "Nissan diesel reliability issues" or just search this site, then make up your own mind.
The above search returned over 31000 hits. Replace "Nissan diesel" with "Subaru" and you get 6500 hits (from Google Australia).
Rough and ready research methodology, I know, but produces some interesting reading. Not sure how many Subarus on the road compared to Nissan diesels, possibly more Subarus.
I'm just going to duck for cover now.
Regards,
John.
AnswerID:
340724
Follow Up By: Willem - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:25
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:25
John
You are drawing a long bow against Nissan diesel reliability.
One particular engine...the European built 3 litre fitted to the Patrol has had reliability issues.
The diesel in the Xtrail is still untried.
Cheers
FollowupID:
608395
Follow Up By: Member - John F (NSW) - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 18:52
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 18:52
True, Willem, but after seeing so many people caught up in the "grenade" saga it beggars belief that any reputable company would not firstly solve the problem and secondly recompense the poor out of pocket owners.
IMHO this kind of corporate behaviour is best treated in one way - don't deal with them. We had a Nissan Prairie in the 80s. Meticulous servicing, from new, yet the head went at 130k. Our mechanic commented that it was a known fault, poor casting quality. Their corporate ethics have not changed.
John.
FollowupID:
608441
Follow Up By: Willem - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 20:03
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 20:03
John
It would be nice to know what the percentages of failed engines are in comparison with engines which have not given trouble. You also have to bear in mind that most vehicles 'grenading' were outside warranty period. And nothing lasts forever. The trouble is that most vehicles these days are bought on credit and people have stretched themselves to the limit financially and when things go pearshaped they are put into an invidious position.
From what can be ascertained of ExplorOz users Nissan Australia have been lacking in customer support.The trouble is one only hears one side of any engine failure story and one may easily form the wrong opinion of the situation. In earlier years things may have been different but Nissan Australia manufacturing folded and all vehicles are now imported. Then Renault took a major share in Nissan and it may be that customer policy is reflected in that marriage. But one only hears of the Bad happenings. Corporate ethics may be your conclusion but if there is a continuing problem then it should be reflected in the sales of the product. I doubt that is.
We have 2 Nissans bought from a country dealer who gives us excellent service. Have no issues there whatsoever.
Cheers
FollowupID:
608449
Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 22:52
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 22:52
I agree with Willem - having owned 6 Nissans in the family over the past 10 years and never had a problem apart from wear and tear.
But you wouldn't catch me in a 3litre Grenade......it was dud.
FollowupID:
608470
Follow Up By: BuggerBoggedAgain - Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 15:50
Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 15:50
Thanx
John & Ingrid, as Willem said, the X-trail hasn't been out long enough for me to get an accurate report on them.
Even googling USA reviews shows both good and bad for both makes,
We just hope we make the right decision when parting with our $$$$$$$'ssss
FollowupID:
608547
Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 08:16
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 08:16
If you need a range of greater than 600k, then buy a manual diesel.
If you are planning on carrying jerry cans, buy the manual diesel.
If no to both, and need an auto, then I think the choice will be between the petrol versions of both vehicles.
We own 2 Xtrails (T30), and have a high opinion of them. But you pay a lot extra for the diesel motor on the T31. And the diesel auto misses out on the CVT, and as a result, doesn't achieve the fuel consumption you'd expect from a diesel. Nissan also reduced the towing limit from 2000 to 1300 with the auto, because the transmission is not as strong.
The servicing on the petrol Xtrails is very simple and cheap (I service ours). I've owned a lot of subarus in the past - great vehicles - but may be a bit unorthodox for the average mechanic out in the sticks.
There's some amazing deals out there at present. Holden are discounting the dual cab diesel Colorados (were Rodeos) by $10,000 at present - it will cost you less than a diesel Xtrail ($32k + costs).
AnswerID:
340732
Follow Up By: BuggerBoggedAgain - Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 16:13
Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 16:13
Thanx Phil, now looking at both petrol versions, I think JR just threw a spanner in the works, a Forester Diesel, that would be worth waiting for, if the replies we have received about petrol foresters
FollowupID:
608549
Reply By: chris_s - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:57
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:57
I know several subarus that have done 450,000-550,000Km without any problems. I've just sold my Forester with 375,000 Km and motor still had near new compression. I found the clearance and approach/departure angles very good for a 'soft roader'. It handled exceptionally
well on wet and corrugated raods.
I sold it for a Nissan Patrol (did the
Canning Stock Route this year). The Forester would have easily handled the
Gibb River Rd and
Mitchell Plateau Rd (probably better than the Patol) due its constant 4X4.
Servicing costs are up in the high end (over $1,000 for the 100,000Km service), but the Patrol has this cost every 40,000Km!!! (dealer didn't tell me this when I asked about the service costs). I tend to do about +40,000km a year.
AnswerID:
340750
Follow Up By: BuggerBoggedAgain - Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 16:27
Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 16:27
Thanks Chris, some-one in Australia X-Trail
forum mentioned this cost with the Trail diesel, struth, on a pension we would have to take out a personel loan, we are the ppl who didn't get the "super benefits" of yesteryear, when we retire, we will have approx. $24,000 between us, that won't last long, we lost $5000 in the meltdown. So much for, super funds are safe.
FollowupID:
608553
Reply By: Kylie in the exy - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:21
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:21
I brought a new X-Trail in 04 and still have it, and a friend of
mine is the same. She has over 100,000 km on the clock and we both have had no probs what so ever.
We have done some pretty good 4x4ing with it and it is very suprising the
places it will get with a good set of Simex AT's on it. I also run a Nissan Patrol for all the hard core stuff.
The ground clearance on the Exy is one of the best one the market, and def puts it ahead of the rest. The power and torque are one of the highest on the market, still with pretty good fuel eco. The new diesel out has 340Nm of torque (from memory) which is incredible. There is also the new additional aids such as traction control and
hill descent etc.
I am also a 4wdriving instructor, and have seen the Subu's at work. The low range is a benefit however dosent seem to be that low that it is worth the sacrifice of the Exy.
The low clearance on the subu will stop it long before anything else is has a chance to go up against.
In terms of reliability, I cant speak as I havent owned one.
The general running costs of the XTrail are great and I ask and expect alot out of my car but look after it.
I am very happy with the choice I made and if I had to do it again, I wouldnt change a thing.
Maybe look at what type of tracks and terrain you will be driving on and make sure that both cars are capable. Also,
check out the type of aftermarket items ie tyres etc you want to put on and make sure it is possible with both cars.
I had a set of Simex Centrepedes on the XTrail and it gave me over 200mm of clearance which was a huge benefit.
Anyway that is my two bobs worth.
Hope it helps
AnswerID:
340753
Reply By: HappyCamper - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 15:39
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 15:39
G'day
Being a huge Subaru fan (currently on my 6th) a Forester GT Turbo, it's not hard to guess what I would suggest. Prior to Subarus I owned several LandCruisers and a Hilux and found their servicing more expensive than the Soobie...then again it's not a true comparison. I'm looking for a good mechanic to do a 100k service atm...anyone living on the mid north coast interested? ;-)
I tow a 680Kg camper trailer with the GT and some years ago used to tow a canvas sided camper trailer (similar weight) with an L series Soobie and both do a good job. Sorry I don't bother with fuel consumption tests these days, used to account for every drop that went through my vehicles, but decided why bother?
I'm planning to do the
Canning Stock Route in the next year or so in my Forester, and as mentioned in another reply I know it would easily handle the
Gibb River Road. Some years ago when travelling the GRR (not in my vehicle) I took particular notice and wouldn't have had a problem getting through...having said that I do know outback roads change from year to year.
My next vehicle will be either another Forester or a Tribeca...but that's not for a few years yet.
Rather than staying in cabins, why not get a tent, I've done the whole Aussie coastline and through the centre in a tent out the back of my Soobie and loved every minute of it. Way to go!!
Good luck with your decision
Bronwyn ;-)
AnswerID:
340783
Follow Up By: HappyCamper - Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 15:45
Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 15:45
....forgot to add that I hope your retirement is everything it should be. I can highly recommend it...sure beats working!!! LOL
Bronwyn ;-)
FollowupID:
608424
Follow Up By: BuggerBoggedAgain - Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 16:52
Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 16:52
Thanx Bronwyn, even though ex-scout, ex-army, she who-is-never-wrong is not a happy camper, so cabins, motels it is.
We will be driving round aussie anti-clockwise following coastline apart from Ayers
rock and Tassie.
The costs of cabins is cheaper than caravan, rego ins, tenting would be great for u an me, but................
I have read reports here that most of Aussie can be conquered with 2WD, so an SUV is a bonus, so far Forester is winning
FollowupID:
608555
Reply By: workhorse - Tuesday, Dec 23, 2008 at 19:27
Tuesday, Dec 23, 2008 at 19:27
Good onya, enjoy the country while we still can.
I have a 06 Forester that is driven about 150km/day, mixture of flat country, windy mountain and gravel roads to the
farm. Fuel economy at the very best is 8.6l/100km freeway 110max steady driving. Doesn't like loads 12l/100km. Doesn't like takeoffs with a load even in low! range, smell the clutch. Engine was replaced at 50k due to glazed bores. Nearly all the
suspension has fallen apart.Trying to find off road tyres are impossible for the rim size. The only bullbar for this model and later is through a Subextreme, no choice. Pre 06 models have smaller motors but stronger off road chassis an
suspension.
I previously had a 96
Liberty wagon with a 2.2. It could pull over a tonne all day, every
suspension component was at least 25% bigger. The new Foresters have the
Liberty rear end
suspension which gives a better ride but the vehicle now is more soft road oreinted.
Vs the X trail.the Forester gives great on road/gravel handling due to its AWD system and
suspension set up. X Trail rolls and pitches at speed. Maybe not an issue.
Prefer to drive my 2000 Courier ute on dirt roads now, less rattle than the 06 Forester!!
Mery Xmas
AnswerID:
341129