Proposed restrictions on lifting suspension

Submitted: Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:42
ThreadID: 65720 Views:4275 Replies:8 FollowUps:26
This Thread has been Archived
I've heard from a usually reliable source that NSW and Victorian authorities are aiming to tighten up on suspension uplifts. Other states are said to be falling into line too. Apparently aimed at the hoon area, but has the potential to impact badly on 4WDs. Even extends to fitting oversize tyres. It's being opposed by the state 4WD associations.

Does anyone have details of this move by the authorities?

John
J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:51

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:51
Already restricted in Qld
AnswerID: 347672

Follow Up By: Member - Mark G Gulmarrad - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 13:13

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 13:13
Also in nsw......2' lift maximum,cheers.
0
FollowupID: 615860

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 13:14

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 13:14
Tyre size in Qld is limited to overall diameter +15 or -26mm.
Body lift is max 50mm
0
FollowupID: 615862

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 13:19

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 13:19
And it would appear that Vic has the same restriction on tyre size.

Vic reg Sect 8

Don't know about body lift.

cheers
Lex M
0
FollowupID: 615864

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 14:35

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 14:35
Hi Lex

Love those Vic regs as with careful reading they allow me to fit 33.3 inch tyres (255X85X16) to my Patrol legally because one european model in the GU range had 245X85X16 as an option even though all others had much smaller tyres.
Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 615877

Follow Up By: Moose - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 16:30

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 16:30
Quote: "Also in nsw......2' lift maximum"

2 feet is a bloody big lift!
0
FollowupID: 615895

Follow Up By: Member - Tony B (Malanda FNQ) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 17:31

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 17:31
Lex - Not quite right re 50mm Max see links

QLD Transport Modifications

Suspension Specific

In Qld it is - Do not alter the ride height of the vehicle by more than one-third of suspension travel specified by the vehicle manufacturer.

So you can raise your vehicle no more than 1/3 of the suspension travel. That makes my 3" lift on my Rodeo legal. Cheers tony
0
FollowupID: 615908

Follow Up By: Member - Poppy (QLD) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 21:01

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 21:01
Tony
You may be legal with a 3" lift but if you have RACQ Insurance as I do, they don't allow any more than a 50mm lift.
Cheers Ray
0
FollowupID: 615937

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 22:40

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 22:40
Qoute" In Qld it is - Do not alter the ride height of the vehicle by more than one-third of suspension travel specified by the vehicle manufacturer.

So you can raise your vehicle no more than 1/3 of the suspension travel. That makes my 3" lift on my Rodeo legal. "

Sorry
I was referring to body lift not suspension lift. Two different things.

cheers
Lex
0
FollowupID: 615968

Follow Up By: Bob the - Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 21:50

Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 21:50
To Robin Miller, do you know if there are any similar circumstances for a 100 sries cruiser being able to fit slightly larger tyers..??? Any help would be much appreciated...
0
FollowupID: 616133

Reply By: Notso - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 13:14

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 13:14
There's been a National Code of practice around for a few years and some states have adopted it and others haven't.

If they all get around to adopting it in NSW, we'll be able to fit a bit larger tyres on 4wds. Currently it is limited to 15mm diameter increase.( Legally)

The National COP allows 50mm for 4wds.
AnswerID: 347675

Reply By: Member - Roscoe ET (QLD) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 14:43

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 14:43
I also understand that there are issues with vehicle manufacturers whilst the vehicle is under warranty in terms of both lifting and fitting oversize tyres as this may void the warranty.

Warranty has precedence over any code of practice or statutory regulations concerning these issues, so you really do need to ascertain what modifications will void the warranty.

Generally, replacement tyres and/or wheel rims must be of the same original factory specification which is in accordance with the vehicle's tyre placard.

In terms of lifting, the fitting of non-manufacturer approved "lift kits" to the suspension of your vehicle will void the warranty.

AnswerID: 347681

Follow Up By: The Landy - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 15:07

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 15:07
And possibly insurance......
0
FollowupID: 615884

Reply By: Member - Matt (Perth-WA) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 15:37

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 15:37
Good!!

Restricting EVERYONE to 31" should have been done 15 years ago.

Im a hypocrite at the moment due to my 32" tyres but the poor Rodeo was dragging its belly in the most mild of tracks due to the 35" tyres that seem to be the minimum nowdays.

Now that most tracks are carved up by 35"s plus you are left with no alternative but to try and go bigger.

If we want our pastime to be sustainable, safe and enviromentally acceptable we DO need to do something.

You would think that common sense would prevail and we would all do the right thing, but there is always someone who doesnt care about anyone apart from themself and then you end up with legislation.

Enforce the COP ASAP and get back to 4WDing without the need for 10in lifts and 44" boggers!!

Matt.
AnswerID: 347685

Follow Up By: stevesub - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 17:02

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 17:02
I agree 100% With your sentiments. I have seen too many gates put across track entrances in NZ when we lived there and the only reason was lifted trucks with 35" + tyres digging ditches when going for a play in the wet.

Whole forests have been closed to 4WD's because of the ir-responsible minority eg Riverhead forest close to Auckland. Their tracks were trashed by 4WD's with big muddies so the owners put up gates everywhere and will not give the keys to anyone - and dare I say it, the culprits were club members who should have known better.

I would be happy as to have 31" max which is what my Troopy has. A couple of years ago, I drowned the Troopy to the top of the bull bar in a water hole in Beerburem Forest near Brissy that I had driven a Freelander through 2 weeks earlier with no problems. I had been doing that track and waterhole every month or so for 2 or 3 years so did not expect to drown a Troopy in it. I assume some idiot with big muddies had dug huge holes in the waterhole sometime over that 2 weeks.

We trashed a snatch strap getting the Troopy out - stitches ripped. I am still not impressed as I ended up with a gearbox full of water and sand and it will need a re-build when I get sick of the bearing noise.

Ban all tyres that are larger in diameter than what the vehicle originally came with. It will keep the vehicles safer by not upsetting the handling or braking as well.

Stevesub
0
FollowupID: 615903

Follow Up By: Patrolman Pat - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 19:09

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 19:09
Blaming lifts and bigger tyres is akin to labelling all 4wders as environmental vandals. Hoons will be hoons regardless of tyre size and lift. I'm quite happy with to wheel with my mates and their 35" tyres knowing full well that they will probably do a lot less damage than an inexperienced driver tring to tackle tracks in an unprepared standard car.
0
FollowupID: 615924

Follow Up By: Ken - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 19:42

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 19:42
Pat, how come it always the same story when this topic comes up. 'My experienced mates', 'experienced drivers', 'capable drivers', all driving around on oversize tyres but never oh never causing damage, that is always done by inexperienced drivers !
If these people are so experienced and capable why do they need oversize tyres ? An what happens when the ruts get o deep that 35's can't keep the diffs of the deck ?
It is a pathetic argument trying to justify something which clearly has caused ruts to be deeper !
Do none of these blokes roar around spinning wheels and ripping up tracks, are you trying to say they tread carefully around the place being careful not to stuff up things for more standard vehicles. Their whole point seems to be look at me I can go anywhere and you can't otherwise why would they bother to upsize.
Ken
0
FollowupID: 615929

Follow Up By: Member - Matt (Perth-WA) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 19:48

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 19:48
Are you for real Pat??

Why do you need 35s?? Because the tracks are churned up so much now that 31s dont cut it.

If tyre size was restricted then it IS the skill of the driver and not the size of his wallet that gets him through...despite the damage.

The standard vehicles you talk about were series I and II landrovers on 15 inch skinny tyres that drove this entire continent on oil exploration trips...NO TRACKS just a compass bearing.

How on earth did they manage without a lifted locked and 35inch Landcruiser/Patrol...simple..they were slow and steady and knew how to drive.

So Pat...where do you stop next...38...40.....44? It has to stop or we lose our pastime.

Matt.
0
FollowupID: 615931

Follow Up By: Member - Bill F (VIC) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 20:44

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 20:44
Pat

Hoons always want it BIGGER

And I am not talking about tyres, motor or lift

Stick with the standard or be labelled a hoon and get done for it

BillF
Fay'd away from the crowd

Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 615933

Follow Up By: Mudripper - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 21:07

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 21:07
Yep,

No-one's going to talk me out of my 7.50x16's.

Most durable tyres that I've had.

Cheers.
0
FollowupID: 615940

Follow Up By: Patrolman Pat - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 21:23

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 21:23
I've only got 33" on my 'Trol but mates with 35" can drive over larger rock ledges and the like due to larger rolling diameter and greater clearance. Slowly negotiating rock ledges does not cause ruts in my experience. Being in SA I can't rememeber the last time I saw mud, let alone drove in it and I/we always avoid it if possible because it's a PITA to drive through and the subsequent cleaning isn't much fun either.
Not all 4WDers want to explore the Simpson and the like, some like to play on steep rocky tracks, often on private property and lockers, lift and larger wheels help that. We'd soon lose access to such places if we were to hoon around ripping up tracks and the more modified vehicles are certainly more easily identifiable if they try to do so.
0
FollowupID: 615948

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 22:42

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 22:42
Restricting everyone to 15mm increase was done years ago. Pity nobody enforces it.
0
FollowupID: 615969

Follow Up By:- Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 13:09

Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 13:09
Yep, another vote here for banning large tyres.

Stop trying to put the blame on inexperienced drivers, that a cop out as we all know who is doing the damage!

0
FollowupID: 616043

Follow Up By:- Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 13:11

Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 13:11
Yep, another vote here for banning large tyres.

Stop trying to put the blame on inexperienced drivers, that's a cop out as we all know who is doing the damage!

0
FollowupID: 616044

Follow Up By:- Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 13:18

Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 13:18
If it's not the ones with larger tyres doing the damage;

then why is it when you see a 4x4 totally covered in mud or
see footage on tv programs such 4wd TV showing clowns deliberately driving muddy tracks or through bog holes

...... that these vehicles always have large diameter tyres????
0
FollowupID: 616046

Follow Up By: Patrolman Pat - Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 18:09

Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 18:09
I'm not suggesting that there aren't hoons with big tyres causing problems, clearly they are. my argument is there are many drivers in modded 4bies with large lifts and tyres that also drive in a responsible manner.
i also stand by my argument that inexperienced drivers cause as much damage as drivers with lockers and lifts etc.. I saw enough evidence of this on the Oz Day weekend at Robe to highlight a recent trip.
0
FollowupID: 616096

Reply By: StormyKnight - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 15:46

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 15:46
I have tyres on my Prado that are over the +15mm, all you need to do is get an engineering certificate.......so oversize tyres aren't illegal in themselves if you get the certificate....

Oh BTW I just went up 1 size to land cruiser standard size 265/75R15s instead of the factory standard of 265/70R15s

Cheers
AnswerID: 347687

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 22:33

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 22:33
It seem's that is an option in some states but I believe in Qld you cannot get an engineer approval for more than 15mm. Not legally anyway.

cheers
Lex
0
FollowupID: 615965

Reply By: Von Helga - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 20:08

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 20:08
John,
Are saying that your source knows of a proposed change to the existing National Code Of Practice for Light Vehicle Modification that is accepted by the ACT.
The RTA and Qld Transport don't reference the code directly however when reading it is obvious that they are currently operating in line with the code.
Trevor
AnswerID: 347728

Reply By: Member - DOZER- Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 20:22

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 20:22
Should i change my avator?? lets talk brand...which is best??
Isnt 4wd supposed to keep you out of trouble, not get you out??
If so, why dont they all come with difflocks std??? Side note, the current climate will put a dint in 35+ sales...u might get your wish.
Andrew
AnswerID: 347731

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 22:45

Thursday, Feb 05, 2009 at 22:45
The guy in the drivers seat is what should keep you out of trouble.

A bit more common sense both on and off road wouldn't go amiss

cheers
Lex
0
FollowupID: 615970

Follow Up By: Member - Roscoe ET (QLD) - Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 09:13

Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 09:13
Couldn't agree with you more Lex!!!
0
FollowupID: 615997

Reply By: Pezza (Bris) - Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 19:05

Friday, Feb 06, 2009 at 19:05
Re 98% of the above comments,

Ahh, the fun police at their best:-))

How dare anybody do anything out of the ordinary in an attempt to enjoy themselves. lol.

Pezza
AnswerID: 347877

Follow Up By: Ken - Saturday, Feb 07, 2009 at 12:02

Saturday, Feb 07, 2009 at 12:02
Pezza, as one of your 98% I can only say "our case rests". The macho big wheel brigade attitude of enjoying yourself regardless of the impact is exactly the problem we have in convincing authorities the 4WDing is a valid form of recreation. Your reply only confirms this view. If this form of 4WDing is your pleasure best you enjoy it while you can and don't give too much thought to to its impact on the majority of us who don't need to prove or wreck anything.
What you do on private land is of no interest, possibly the landowner will get sick of the damage possibly not. On public land it is a different story, that land belongs to us all but only if it is looked after will all of us be allowed to use it.
Ken
0
FollowupID: 616215

Sponsored Links