Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 15:05
Nic...you want me to open that can of worms...hahahha!
Mate the opinons of dump pipes and advantages/dis are as diverse as the variables involved in the vehicles you look at.
The only way to know for sure is dyno before and dyno after. Some vehicles responed
well to dump pipe increases and some dont. Some respond
well in one area but lose in another...there is no set standard.
Additionally the rest of the system can change the results too, having different outcomes from the same dump pipe construction but dependant on the remaining of the exhaust layout.
The thermodynaics involved in turbos and exhaust system design make it impossible to give a straight answer..Sorry every application is different and results can only be tested with dyno results of torque and HP across the entire rev range.
Me...Im of the opinon that small turbo applications dont respond all that
well to dump pipe and while you might gain in top end you lose substantially in bottom end. Remember a restriction actually increases air speed across it and this can aid in the turbo operation in some cases.
So I went 2.5 pipe but left the standard dump pipe...this enabled me to not have to remove the heat shilelding and protect my clutch master and heater/coolant hoses that would have been cooked otherwise. With no dyno results but running beside my wifes car with the same 4JB1t engine it leaves her for dead in both take-off and acceleration at higher speed.
So Im happy, I required more torque at low RPM and better driveability for overtaking with the trailer at higher speed.
All the best
Matt.
FollowupID:
616964