Mitsubishi Challenger - Extremely Capable - After market products
Submitted: Sunday, Aug 24, 2003 at 18:51
ThreadID:
6795
Views:
19427
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
9
This Thread has been Archived
Murfa
I own a September 2002 Mitsubishi Challenger, and could not be happier with the performance. I have been to some of the roughest teraine here in Queensland, and it has nver let me down. I go to Frazer a few time a year in it, and have never managed to get bogged. I have pulled that many troopies, pathies and older nissans out off trouble, I can't keep count. Just recenlty I have added an ARB Rear Air locker, and TJM
Suspension, only to gain the max 45mm suspention lift able to be gainned. I have added these, as i am thinking of travelling around australia, and believe that these are extremely good additions to add to my vehicle. Apart from this it is standard. the capabilities of the Challenger are endless, extreemly off road and load carrying ability. I would pick the challenger over the new hilux, Parthy or frontera anyday. The Ground clearance isn't crash hot, but the under body is built like a brick bleep house, so this is not such a problem. i am looking to fit a longer range Fuel tank and modify an existing
snorkel to fit the challenger for safe water crossings, and better fuel range. if anybody knows someone in
brisbane area, who can modify a
snorkel for the challenger, or mandrall bend a stainless steele one it would be greatly appreciated. Also if anybody know's if any company makes a long
ranger tank.
Reply By: cookie - Tuesday, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:49
Tuesday, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:49
The pathfinders torque low down is good but the challenger stacks up pretty
well against it.
I have just recently purchased a 98 challenger and did quite a bit of research before deciding to go for one. I obtained the full power and torque curves from mitsubishi and the facts are as below.
Challenger-
3.0L V6 Petrol
Torque (max) - 265Nm @4500rpm
Torque (2800rpm) - 242 Nm
Torque (1500rpm) - 218 Nm
Fuel Economy (city) - 13 L/100k's
Pathfinder-
3.3L V6 Petrol
Torque (2800rpm) - 266 Nm (Max)
Torque (1500rpm) - 239 Nm
Fuel Economy (city) - 16 L/100k's
Power-
Pathfinder 125kW @ 4800rpm (max)
Challenger 126kW @ 4800rpm
136kW @ 5500rpm (max)
Yes the pathfinder has more torque low down, but the challenger has 91% of the torque low down from a smaller capacity motor, (91% smaller funnily enough), effectively the same maximum torque, granted it is higher in the range. Same power at 4800rpm and then more to go. But the biggest thing for me is the challenger uses 81% of the fuel a pathfinder uses.
Those are the numbers. I can send anyone the full curves for the challenger if they are interested.
Cookie.
AnswerID:
29879