Simplicity Suspension on New Van

Submitted: Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 17:18
ThreadID: 67977 Views:6958 Replies:6 FollowUps:6
This Thread has been Archived
Our new Van the we will be inspecting on Monday has 3500kg Simplicity Suspension but no shock's told it would have shocks but in the photos they sent me there is none fitted. Does anyone know if Simplicity suspension comes with shocks before I front them on Monday?
200 Series V8 Diesel
Thanks for the Rest Flying West and Flying Very Low along the track not coming back. The Crow

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: toyocrusa - Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 17:34

Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 17:34
Hi. I searched on google and came up with the following.Regards,Bob.

Try a set of Koni adjustable shockers to Simplicity suspension and I'm
sure you'll have a much better riding van. In my opinion wide Leaf
springs still need shockers and the $600 odd $$$ would be well spent
and reduce van stress. We have Konis set for soft ride fitted
to our coil sprung van worked a treat even on severe corrugations.
The one spring set up in Simplicity tandem suspension makes it a true
load sharing suspension. 90mm to the bump stop is reasonalbe up
movement most vehicles dont have any more than that when loaded. If
the suspension is hitting the bump stop a lot I'd recommend slowing
down.
cya
Graham

Reply 12 of 15 posted 12 Oct 2003 at 22:14 -
collyn replied to the question

Re Simplicity suspension, BTs, semi trailers etc and the need or otherwise for shock absobers.

One could write a number of books on this. Years back I almost did but turned into a series of articles (in Modern Motor) instead.

Start by considering what happens when a wheel travels over a bump on a vehicle with leaf springs and no shock absorbers.

Wheel is thrust upward as it encounters bump compressing the spring. The kinetic energy of that rapidly rising wheel and part of the axle assembly is now held within that compressed spring (just like a bow that has been pulled taught by an archer).

Once the wheel is over the bump it is now hurled down again by the energy held within that compressed spring (i.e as if the archer has released the arrow).

The downward thrusting wheel impacts the road surface with one hell of a thump. This shock load is transmitted back through the vehicle structure where it does the damage that one reads about on sites like this.

The impact of the wheel onto the road compresses the tyre to the extent that the wheel rebound and thrust the wheel back up. The cycle repeats at a lower level of energy - and if you see a car with coild spring suspension and a broken or crook shock absorber the wheel literally bounces up and down like a demented yo yo.

What's needed therefore is a way of dissipating the energy imparted to the springs. This can readily by done by converting it into heat. That's what a shock absorber does and how it works. It's just a heat pump.

With leaf springs there is some resistance as one leaf slides over another but this occurs mainly on the upward cycle, little on rebound. It is fairly effective on multi-leaf springs, but as the stresses on such springs are huge, they must either be very short or have limited travel.

For a soft ride however, the requirement is for the opposite, supple springs with substantial movement. This can only be achieved by using adequate damping via the somewhat miscalled shock absorbers.

Simplicity suspension is a special case. It has very little spring travel, relying instead of the walking beam action to allow a wheel to rise over a bump, with the imparted intertia partially counteracted by the inertia of the other wheel of the pair.

Whilst this action does reduce the workload on a damper, l am far from convinced that it would not work a great deal better with adequate damping - but off-raod it's a lot better than most that's around.

Most semi-trailer suspension is of a similar walking beam nature - but that on the 6 X 6 ACCO for example has massive shock absorbers as well. The move to air suspension on trucks has made shock absorbers absolutely vital, as of course they are also with coil springs (as they have virtually zero effective damping).

Curiously, and with rare exceptions, caravan builders believe that none of the above applies to them.
Collyn Rivers



AnswerID: 360187

Reply By: Gone Bush (WA) - Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 17:35

Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 17:35
No shocks.

You will find that you may have to play with tyre presures a lot more than before.

I'm glad I ain't too scared to be lazy
- Augustus McCrae (Lonesome Dove)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 360188

Reply By: Sawtybt - Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 17:46

Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 17:46
A second for no shocks,,,,,,

Image Could Not Be Found
AnswerID: 360193

Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 18:29

Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 18:29
We have a Roadstar Voyager 4000 that has this and its still going Ok 6 years on.

Doesnt have shocks fitted. I run 50lb in the tyres and they seem to stay at that and generally run at about 7-8 deg above ambient.

Use a set of tyre senders to keep a track of them and it works cos picked up a big nail in one and alarm went off when tyre dropped 25% of pressure.
A worthwhile investment on a tandem van as hard to notice if you get a puncture in a tandem.

Tows like a dream and weighs 2.8 tonne

Cheers.
AnswerID: 360201

Reply By: Bushed-Tracker - Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 19:17

Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 19:17
We have travelled full time for 4 years on some very rough tracks -riding on Simplicity suspension - no shocks - no problems.

Shocks are not standard equipment and I do not think you will add any value by installing them them

B-T
AnswerID: 360216

Follow Up By: Member - The Crow (QLD) - Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 19:36

Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 19:36
We were told that it would have shocks but it looks like it hasn't. I wanted to know if Simplicity suspension can have shocks fitted or if it is not an option with them. If we weren't told that we would have shocks I wouldn't be worried about them but we were not told any different before the van was built and expected them. The builders have already changed the suspension once because they set it up for 14 inch wheels instead of the ordered 16 inch 5 stud landcruiser. So I hope they put the new setup on square otherwise the tyres will scrub out.
200 Series V8 Diesel
Thanks for the Rest Flying West and Flying Very Low along the track not coming back. The Crow

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 628060

Follow Up By: jeepthing - Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 19:43

Saturday, Apr 18, 2009 at 19:43
My understanding of Simplicity Suspension is that it is designed to work without the need for shocks because it is a load sharing suspension system.

I believe the same applies with the tandem suspension system that uses the rocker arm between the springs.

I could be wrong but I understood the reason is that the springs on both these systems do not flex to the extend that they need to be dampened by a shock absorber.
0
FollowupID: 628062

Follow Up By: Bushed-Tracker - Sunday, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:24

Sunday, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:24
I suggest that if people are concerned then they talk to the manufacturers: N,P,Hauffe [hauffe@vic.chariot.net.au]

B-T
0
FollowupID: 628140

Follow Up By: jeepthing - Sunday, Apr 19, 2009 at 14:20

Sunday, Apr 19, 2009 at 14:20
No concerns here B-T I have simplicity on my van, single wheels same experience as you no shocks no problems.

Nothing moves inside the van and our kitchen is at the rear where you would expect things to move around if the suspension needed shocks.

I agree with you any concerns talk to the manufacturer.
0
FollowupID: 628149

Follow Up By: Kiwi100 - Sunday, Apr 19, 2009 at 15:51

Sunday, Apr 19, 2009 at 15:51
I'm curious about how this type of load-sharing removes the need for shockies. While I can understand how the suspension might articulate over bumps at low speeds, wouldn't it be different at road speeds on corrugations?

For instance, the first wheel would hit the bump milliseconds before the second wheel, hardly allowing the leisurely transfer of loads back and forth between the set, surely? Therefore, wouldn't it come back to each half of the spring pack attached to each wheel having to operate in a fairly normal leaf spring manner? And therefore needing a shocker to dampen the hammering described above in Collyn's post?

Wouldn't the leading swing arm on this sort of suspension also need to travel both forward and upward upon striking an obstacle, thereby increasing any impact?
0
FollowupID: 628155

Follow Up By: jeepthing - Sunday, Apr 19, 2009 at 19:19

Sunday, Apr 19, 2009 at 19:19
I think as suggested by B-T contact the manufacturer.

As mentioned I've only got single wheels on my van and it sits there behind my vehicle and seems to float over the bumps.

I have a rear camera which is directed at the tow hitch and also the tyres so I can check to make sure they are maintaining pressure and one thing I have noticed is that they are not flexing very much at all and I've found that they run quite cool.

The previous van I owned had standard suspension and I needed to ensure that stuff in the cupboards were held on place so i made bookends and packed the items between them otherwise they would be everywhere in the cupboards sometimes.

To me that's enough evidence that the Simplicity Suspension is working differently to standard suspension so the impact must be decreased.
0
FollowupID: 628194

Reply By: RV Powerstream P/L - Monday, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:55

Monday, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:55
I doubt that Hauffe would have told anyone that you need shocls as they are not normally fitted.

I have a 3 Ton Simplicity and I cannot speak highly enough on the ride it gives.

With a normal suspension the axle sits mid spring and needs dampening for vertical chatter.

The simpliciity load share has the axles at the ends of the spring and as the front wheel rises the back wheel cushions the action and as the back wheel rises the front wheel cushions the action.

This action in itself softens the ride and eliminates the need for shocks.

Shocks would be a cost with little result under the circumstances.
Ian
AnswerID: 360476

Sponsored Links