Hilux vs Navara
Submitted: Sunday, May 10, 2009 at 21:19
ThreadID:
68708
Views:
12036
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
12
This Thread has been Archived
Straydingo
Hi all again,
I recently asked about Prado vs Patrol and got some great responses. Alas, both are out of budget and not quite going to suit what we had in mind. So we changed it!
I'm now looking at a ST-X Navara or a SR5 hilux. Both Diesel, both dual cab.
What are the thoughts on these two? Nav has a 2.5lt vs a 3.0lt, but Nav also has 3000kg towing quote as opposed to 2250kg in the lux.
Usage would be as a 'business' car (love this 30% investment allowance), but long term plans is soft-road and later (after experience and training!) off-road. Towing is important, but probably at the hi-lux limit (inc passengers and load).
All thoughts greatly appreciated again.
Cheers
Andrew
Reply By: Doddgey - Monday, May 11, 2009 at 10:06
Monday, May 11, 2009 at 10:06
Straydingo,
We bought 2 petrol Navara's in late 2007 (after always owning Hilux's) on the back of price, reviews including a 4WD of the year award and the way they performed on a
test drive.
Awesome power, very nice to drive, very roomy and comfortable and a clever internal layout.
However, we were very dissapointed with the build quality and the fuel economy. In the end we went back to Toyota's late last year and are once again very happy.
Yes you pay more up front, but I think we will get it back in spades on reliability and resale.
Just my opinion.
Cheers
Doddgey
AnswerID:
364258
Reply By: Member - Broe (WA) - Monday, May 11, 2009 at 10:55
Monday, May 11, 2009 at 10:55
I was open and minded and looked at all three.
Also spoke to a few hire companies with their costs.
Basically this is what I ended up with;
Reliability, Hilux, if you are going to own the truck for a while, you will spend less on maintenance
Towing, Equal, the Triton, and Navara though rated more, you would not put more than 2 tonne on these vehicles for offroad or 2 1/2 for on road. Numerous cases of structual damage to all vehicles towing more than 2 1/2 tonne. Probably would be good for 3 tonne in a straight line. If you want to tow, get a Land Rover / Cruiser etc
Initial Cost, we all know this one
Resale, by far the Hilux
Adaptability, Hilux. I was very disappointed with the interior of the Navara. Triton was ok but not built to last. under bonnet space also in the Navara is shocking and if you speak to any service guy, they all hate working on them. Triton not too bad and easy to work on but problems creep in after about 50,000km (this is hire vehicle stats so prob longer for a private owner as they look after their vehicles better) as opposed to about 110,000 for a Hilux. Look at whether or not you need a 2nd battery, water heater (underbonnet) or anything else including your hands if you do need to do anything.
Hence I ended up getting a hilux.
AnswerID:
364264
Reply By: tim_c - Monday, May 11, 2009 at 12:01
Monday, May 11, 2009 at 12:01
Hi,
I've been thinking over the same vehicles for a while. I would have bought the previous model HiLux but can't quite get past the looks of the current model. I looked at the BT50 but my impression was it was a bit light-duty for the outback touring I had in mind. I was also looking at the D40 Navara but have heard of lots of problems with these - particularly the clutch (look elsewhere on this site and/or go to
http://motorsm.com/complaints/latest.asp for some info) - this will be particularly important as you've mentioned you want to use it for towing. The autos can give problems too with a particulate emissions sensor which quickly fouls up and results in poor fuel economy. These sensors are rumoured to be around $4-5k to replace.
Personally, I think the Triton is for people who don't think the current HiLux is ugly enough, and I wouldn't touch a Mitsubishi due to their reputation with transmissions. Although they argue they have fixed those problems, the reputation still seems to affect resale value on current models. Add to that: the parts counter at my local Holden/Mitsubishi dealer is covered in adverts for genuine Mitsubishi reconditioned transmissions. Most dealers' parts counters have posters telling you to use only genuine consumables (oils, filters, belts, etc.) but Mitsubishi has posters telling you of the advantages of replacing your transmission with a genuine reconditioned one...
AnswerID:
364273
Follow Up By: Straydingo - Monday, May 11, 2009 at 15:47
Monday, May 11, 2009 at 15:47
yeah I looked at the BT50/
Ranger but wasn't convinced. Likewise the Colarado just seemed cheap in build and quality (let alone just simply uncomfortable to sit in at the dealer's)
Mits is simply out of the question, after already having 4 mits cars, all with problems that the mechanics have said "Wow, never seen THAT before. That shouldn't happen......"
Personally, I think the Hiluxs look pretty good tho, especially with a full kit installed -steel bar, lift kit, ATs, etc etc. But yes, you've got to wonder what happen to the Triton design team :-)
FollowupID:
631996
Reply By: TerraFirma - Monday, May 11, 2009 at 15:35
Monday, May 11, 2009 at 15:35
I have 2 friends with Navaras and they both love the Hilux when they drive
mine however they couldn't justify the price difference for work vehicles. I reckon both vehicles are great products however you cannot deny the differences. Your choice will depend on your budget, I wouldn't want to be towing 3000KG with a Navara too often.
The Hilux is perhaps an expensive product yet it keeps breaking sales records, hec the 2nd top selling vehicle behind the Commodore.! Thats gotta say something.
Value for money the Navara is a great choice.
AnswerID:
364315