Friday, Jun 26, 2009 at 18:45
An example of what I mean about reliability of electronics in 4wd vehicles today.
I referred to this once in the past with reference to the F 250 electrical wiring, a wiring harness made in Brazil to Fords woefull specs.
How can one expect to undertake any kind of
water crossing with exposed electrioniccs like this under an almost new vehicle?
The same engine computer that controls the electronic timing of the injectors, ALSO controls the auto transmission, via these exposed electrical connectors pins!
The Injector Drive Modules located up under the left fender just above axel height and it is about as
well protected from moisture /
water ingress as this conector on the side of the auto trans.
It doesnt matter WHERE the
water gets into the control system - the facts are - once wet the whole vehicle becomes inoperable - it can't select gears and the engine wont run.
Oh yeah - you can't tow it in for repairs either - it requires a tilt tray truck (and at 4 tonnes a much bigger one than our average 5 tonner that the RAC send out!
Whats it gonna cost to sendsuch a truck out to theback of Burke to pickup your electronically controlled (insert brand of choice here) new miracle 4wd offroad vehicle?.
The whole idea of having mission critical MECHGANICAL components controlled by poorly designed electrical harnesses will se an awful lot of people towing heavy vans long distances from help - getting "stranded" a long way from home and help anda local dealer - at the first
sign of a cloud in the sky!
Speaking from experience - i took our beast down the balla balla road from Whim
creek about a week after a cyclone. The road was dry BUT there were puddles on the side of the road, red/brown muddy puddles at that!
Where these went out across the road in spots you HAD to drivbe thru them...which initially seemed fine, keep 2 wheels up on the dry and g as high as possible - let the left wheels run through the puddles - maybe 3 or 4 inches deep..at a reasonably slow pace - enough momentum to get you thru but not fast like a maniac.
Trouble is - this whole flats now being mined for magnetitie a heavy black samd like material used in stainless steel manufacture apparently, and that stuff is in the red clay mud of the puddles where being heavy like gold it settles out.
Anyway the mud gets up into connections like the one on the transmission AND the injector drive module computer up under the LH front mudgaurd, and the magentic properties make it attach itself and STAY there - forever more shorting out all those connections, rows of little sparks running up and down your connections confusing totally he computer that runs your engine and transmission..
All that from a shower of rain a week before, and a few puddles on the road!
The repair bills totalled more than $7K including the trucking and took more than 5 months to find and fix.
I have REAL concerns about reliabilty of these NEW 4 X 4's which cost near on the best part of $100K, that are all "electronically controlled" for the REAL offroad conditions we find in Oz.
They might be fine hauling your van up the bitumen (
mine always was) but getting offroad into wet unsealed road conditions could become expensive disasters based on my real world experience so far!
A LOT of it will have to do with how
well engineered the electrinic harnesees are and where these sentivie computers etc that control everything will be located.
I think Toyota maybe would take alot more effort and care with their electronics design than say the Ford I drive.
I guess the point is do we REALLY need to go away from the Mechanical reliability we had in say the 80 series diesel cruisers with all this newfangled electroonics in the latest 4wd's!
Diesel was always inherrantly reliable in
water crossings etc BECAUSE there were no electrics to short out and shut down the engine & drivetrain, so WHY are we now cmbining electrics with the r3eliability of diesel engines to now make them totally unreliable?
It seems kinda silly to me, maybe NOT so for the town commuter car but definitely so for the workhorse of the outback.
Maybe I'm alone in my belief - but then again maybe I'm just one of the first to be discovering such shortcommings in what these days are now such high technology vehicles.
I reckon time may prove me right - or not!
Theres no quick way to know the outcome of this new technology.
What we did know is that the old mechanical diesel etechnology worked and was incredibly reliable..
Will we be saying that about the new 200 series cruisers in say 10 years time?
Only the new vehicle owners who have them now, will be able to make that call.
How many of those new 200 series diesels do I see with soccer moms driving them to the
supermarket & taking the kids to soccer - are we likely to get such real offraod experiences related from typical owners of 200 series that will likely never see the gravel, let alone a puddle or
water crossing?
It will be the outback tour ops & mining co guys etc etc who will be the first to be able to tell or not whether this new technology adds up.
The jurys still out at this point in time - and everyone should place their bets while we wait to see.
Cheers
FollowupID:
639263