Rooftop tent versus Camper Trailer

Submitted: Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 20:07
ThreadID: 73390 Views:14366 Replies:7 FollowUps:6
This Thread has been Archived
I recently saw (I'm nearly, well almost sure I saw) an advert in one of the 4X4 mags the other day suggesting that their rooftop tent was more fuel efficient than a camper trailer (I suppose an argument for wind resistance versus weight).

I am not so sure....

Can anyone comment with their own experiences?

Thanks

Steve

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Mick O (VIC) - Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 20:45

Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 20:45
Having used both, I think that towing a 1 tonne trailer reduces the fuel economy a lot more than a roof top tent and roof rack. I also think that the manner in which a vehicle is driven with either will also have a very telling effect. EO member John (vic) has a trailer with a roof top tent on that just to confuse issues LOL.

If driving sensibly, only a marginal difference with the roof-top tent and roof rack, average .5kpl where as a trailer on average reduced my economy in the Pootrol by 1.5 to 2 kpl. In tough conditions, even more telling. Off track with trailer (approx 950kgs), 3.5 to 4 kpl. Roof top tent 5.5-6 kpl. A Significant difference.

Cheers Mick
''We knew from the experience of well-known travelers that the
trip would doubtless be attended with much hardship.''
Richard Maurice - 1903

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 389299

Follow Up By: you eat the bear - Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 21:41

Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 21:41
Thanks, Mick.

Exactly what I was after - real numbers.

Trip around Australia at approx 3,000 kms (and I haven't yet done the maths) this may be enough to sway the decision.

Cheers

Stephen
0
FollowupID: 657047

Follow Up By: Member - Mick O (VIC) - Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 23:05

Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 23:05
Stephen,

your needs should dictate the decision between trailer/RTT more so than fuel economy. You can certainly fit a lot more in a trailer and it needn't weigh in at 1t or better. You have a lot more storage options with a trailer than you possibly will have with a roof rack and in the vehicle. You should balance those needs and make your decision on what is best for your situation (eg; wife and three kids and equipment....go the trailer and have some comfort and space in the vehicle).

Cheers Mick
''We knew from the experience of well-known travelers that the
trip would doubtless be attended with much hardship.''
Richard Maurice - 1903

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 657066

Reply By: Best Off Road - Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 21:02

Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 21:02
Stephen,

Give me a call. I can put you in touch with a chap who does very good rooftop tents at the right price.

Cheers,

Jim.

AnswerID: 389310

Follow Up By: you eat the bear - Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 21:39

Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 21:39
Thanks Jim.

My issue is also that I need to carry enough water and fuel etc inside the vehicle it's starting to get a bit crowded.
A long range tank at $1500 is a dent in the cost of a camper trailer - albeit a smallish one.
I can put water, fuel, bedding, stove, gas bottles etc etc in the trailer and also have a queen sized mattress to sleep on.
After all the weight of these items is the same whether internally or externally carried.
Also the 2nd spare tyre has to go somewhere. The trailer will have 3 therefore I'm leaning that way.
So the question is how much more fuel does the camper use over a rooftop? Is it enough to impact on a decision on the investment in additional hardware (the camper)?

Stephen


0
FollowupID: 657046

Reply By: Member - Ed. C. (QLD) - Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 22:18

Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 22:18
Not my own experience, but I was discussing this very subject today with friends/rellos who own both a 'car-topper', and a standard soft-floor camper trailer, and they tell me that (in their experience) there is no discernable difference in fuel usage between the 2 options.. Vehicle is a Landcruiser 4.2L turbo-diesel 'Troopie'..

There are a few variables which can affect fuel economy, not the least of which being the way the vehicle is driven ;-)

Personally, I'd rather tow 2 tonnes than carry 1... (YMMV)

:)



Confucius say.....
"He who lie underneath automobile with tool in hand,
....Not necessarily mechanic!!"

Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 389331

Reply By: Serendipity (WA) - Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 23:19

Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 23:19
Hi Steve

Your maths is a bit off if you are looking at a trip around Australia doing only 3000km. Might be a typo.

I once met a bloke in Fitzroy Crossing as I was fueling up. I noticed his front wheel leaning out about 100mm and just had to ask how that happened. He told a story of traveling up the Tanami track - sitting on about 80km as the road was good. Suddenly there came a right angle turn which he missed and careened off into low knee high scrub smashing into a termite mound. That did the damage to the front suspension. The part I found amazing was he said he had a second spare wheel bolted to his roof rack that sheered off the bolts and rocketed into the knee high scrub. They never found that wheel after looking for hours. And it was actually bolted onto with decent bolts.

Just a lesson about what you would put up top when off road.

David



Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 389346

Follow Up By: you eat the bear - Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 08:24

Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 08:24
Oops! Yes - slipped a zero there David.

All my off road experience and assorted advice along the way discourages me from putting anything heavy on the roof. Apart from center of gravity issues, I've got to get it back down from up there!

Steve

0
FollowupID: 657096

Reply By: Member - Pesty (SA) - Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:49

Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:49
Personally the diff between roof topper and camper trailer fuel economy wouldn't be my issue.The overall diff in cost over the whole trip will be out weighed by the more convenience of the camper.
I would be looking for comfort and convenience for an extended trip.
The problems i see with a roof topper is the minimal space, and depending on your age, the climbing up and down the ladder, one wrong strep and the ground comes up pretty fast, and what do you do if the weather is crap, not the best accom to sit it out, make meals etc etc
The camper trailer would give you a base when camped in one spot for a few days, as you dont have to fold it up to go for a drive or even a carton of milk so to speak, not to mention the storage advantages for some creature comforts, like maybe a porta potti, generator/solar panels, chairs, tables etc etc
Get a decent camper and have a great time.

Pesty
AnswerID: 389360

Reply By: you eat the bear - Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 08:26

Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 08:26
Thanks all.

A CT is definitely the way to go then. Just when I thought I had enough stuff.....


Steve
AnswerID: 389366

Follow Up By: The Landy - Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:54

Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:54
Steve

I might add to previous comments havig owned both is that a roof-top tent is a sleeping area only.....a camper trailer is much more in that it is a sleeping/living area.

Both are excellent options, but applied to the rigght situation. I think you would be better served by a CT for an extended trip around Oz.

Mind you I do have a Rooftop for sale...we have outgrown it...

Good luck with it....
0
FollowupID: 657138

Follow Up By: sweetwill - Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 15:43

Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 15:43
hi there steve.
as landy says a roof top is only a bed, fine in my case as im single and on the move from day to day. cheers bill.
0
FollowupID: 657148

Reply By: bug - Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 15:17

Friday, Oct 30, 2009 at 15:17
I would always suggest a camper trailer, if you set up camp and you want to do a bit of exploring in the car you can't. A camper is better for wind resistance as well.
AnswerID: 389421

Sponsored Links