Decade's End- Or Is It?
Submitted: Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 13:08
ThreadID:
74793
Views:
3843
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
21
This Thread has been Archived
kimberleybloke
TV and radio reports of new years eve celebration's keep saying this is the end of the decade,many years ago when I went to school I'm sure we were taught that a decade was ten years long.We have just completed year nine of this decade,so the end of 2010 should be the end of the "noughties"decade.
Anyway all the best for the new year.
Reply By: Fred G NSW - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 14:59
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 14:59
This isn't doing Hairy's headache much good you blokes !!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL
The Year 1AD would have started at the end of year 1BC.
e.g. Dec 31st 1BC followed by Jan 1st 1AD.
At that point the year 1 AD was 1 day old, until 365 days later, when it would have become Jan 1st 2 AD, at which point the year 2 AD was 1 day old.
When did leap years come into the equation?? Was 4AD the first leap year ??
And why is Feb 29th the catch up day?
Fred.
AnswerID:
397204
Follow Up By: Alloy c/t - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 15:12
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 15:12
Now count backwards from 10 using your fingers 10-9-8-7-6 plus 5 fingers on the other hand = 11 LOL.
FollowupID:
666004
Reply By: Member - Norm C (QLD) - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 18:03
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 18:03
This debate was had back at the change from 1999 to 2000. We celebrated the start of the new millenium then whether we liked it or not.
Well the media, govt etc did anyway.
On that basis, it is now 10 years later, so I guess that's a decade.
If you disagree, you needed to get upset enough back in 1999 to get the millennium change postponed for a year.
My view - who cares? I survived the last decade, and plan on surviving the next - and the one after that too hopefully. That's all that matters to me.
Norm C
AnswerID:
397232
Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 18:07
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 18:07
Yep!! I'm with you Norm.
FollowupID:
666029
Follow Up By: Fred G NSW - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 18:17
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 18:17
Being born in the first half of last century, I can't argue with that Norm.
May there be a few more decades left for us :-))
Fred.
FollowupID:
666032
Follow Up By: pop2jocem - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 19:28
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 19:28
Yep, I'll go along with you blokes, who gives an obese rodents rectum, my head hurts enough without worrying about it.
Cheers Pop
FollowupID:
666050
Reply By: Olsen's 4WD Tours and Training - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 19:16
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 19:16
2010 is supposedly the 2010th year after the birth of Christ, according to our Gregorian derived calendar- thats how we measure years. The first decade after Christs supposed birth would end 10 years after his birth. The first year would be year 1. the second year 2 etc the tenth year 10, so the new decade would begin at the end of the tenth year. First day of the new decade would thus be Jan 1 2011
So decades as recorded by our calendar based on the supposed date of the birth of Christ end at the end of 2010, 2020 etc and one thousand years after the birth of Christ would end at the end of the thousandth year eg 2000 so the new millenium begins Jan 1 2001. I remeber as a child everyone saying the beginning of 2001 would be the significant milestone. By the time 2000 came around everyone had decided the even number ending in 000 was more significant.
AnswerID:
397242
Follow Up By: Alloy c/t - Saturday, Jan 02, 2010 at 08:56
Saturday, Jan 02, 2010 at 08:56
Problem is BC and AD , should there be a year Zero / writings other than the King James version of the Bible state that Jesus was executed in his 33rd year yet the Gregorian calendar that is in use brings the date of the crucifixion as 30AD for a 33year old man ,,
FollowupID:
666122
Reply By: chevypower - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:10
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:10
It's true, there was no year zero. So end of 10AD was the end of the first decade, and end of 2000 was the end of the second millennium. But when talking about a decade as "sixties," it is correct to refer to Jan 1 1960- Dec 31 1969 as "The Sixties." The Sixties was not Jan 1 1961- Dec 31 1970. Just like a man in his 40s could be anywhere from 40th birthday to the day before he turns 50. Even though when he is 49, he is living his 50th year.
So, it is not the end of the 201st decade since the birth of Christ, but it is the beginning of a decade that would be called - whatever the name of this decade is going to be called... (It will be easier to name after 2020).
AnswerID:
397249
Follow Up By: Fred G NSW - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:47
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:47
good call chevypower.....I'm in my "sixties" but prefer all to think I'm closer to 60 than 70 LOL LOL
FollowupID:
666073
Follow Up By: pop2jocem - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:50
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:50
I guess after 2012 we will be in our teens, how exciting, I'm looking forward to being a virgin again
(;-))))))
Cheers Pop
FollowupID:
666074
Follow Up By: Fred G NSW - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:50
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:50
mind you.....there's some reaaaaly cranky old bastards on here waaaay over the 70's LOL LOL
FollowupID:
666075
Follow Up By: Fred G NSW - Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:52
Friday, Jan 01, 2010 at 20:52
pop......that ain't gonna happen :-(
FollowupID:
666076