Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 16:56
LOL, thanks Royce!
I agree with you when you say "As I travel around Oz I usually see myself as a 'traveller' rather than tourist. I tend to avoid the tourist spots... and in the meanwhile get to see the most wonderful things!" I also don't enjoy the over-commericalised tourist destinations, but perhaps more for the money-grabbing than the tourists - I spent an afternoon and the next whole day at Ayers
Rock (after travelling through the relative solitude of
Dalhousie Springs and
Chambers Pillar) and then couldn't get out of there quick enough! I also like to take photos of scenery without people in them (something I had to give up on at Taj Mahal! LOL!). It's good to find a quiet
campsite to enjoy the natural surroundings, but if someone else wants to enjoy it also, I don't see why I should claim any more right to it than them (but if we're here to enjoy the natural surroundings, leave your radio switched off - or on just quietly!). And you might just get some great travel advice over a cold drink and campfire enjoyed with another like-minded traveller...
"I would selfishly like to go back 40 years with half the
population and have wild remote areas to myself a bit more."
Well, surely you must admit that more people visiting some of these
places has made them more accessible and better serviced. It's now easy sealed road all the way to Ayers
Rock. If you're in the Simpson and something goes wrong, you'll be unlikely to die before being found (not that we should rely on other people, but you can't plan/provide for every possible disaster). And you're unlikely to be stuck in
Innamincka for a month or more waiting for flooded rivers to recede (thanks to the Burke & Wills
bridge). There are SOME advantages (even if bitumen all the way to Ayers
Rock is a debatable 'advantage'!) to having more people contributing to the Federal Treasury... :-)
FollowupID:
669144