Saturday, Feb 13, 2010 at 22:04
Bob, appreciate your seriousness of the situation as it turned out to be, but you are taking some aspects out of true context.
Not enough fuel to do a east to west of the Madigan..sure..but that was not their intention..
Inconvenienced several other groups...??.. I think most of us out there are happy to assist if required...these blokes made a bad mistake back at Poepells, and continued with bad decisions by trying to "progress" their way out.
Lucky for them, the walkers and their convoy were there to assist, could have been me, or others too assisting, ...but they did good, I am sure it didn't hinder their own pursuit to assist the walking event.
As for the maps.. thats very bad responsibility,, but for GPS for their intended trip,,, I never had one when I first did the Simpson east/west and west east, maps and common sense were fine, as they were for many travellers before affordable access to GPS devices.
I agree there was licence to report the incident in the magazine, but to repeat it from another person in the same issue... I don't think so.
As for criminally negligent...what offence against legislation has occurred..??
Maybe some "uncommon sense" is the appropriate charge..?
I think I got peeved when the issue was raised a 2nd time in the same article, and we also had to be treated by the ongoing saga from the previous issue of the length of a tree in a campfire and a conflict of opinions between a camper and a government authorised officer over another piece of legislation relating to permitted or non permitted
camp fires.
Overall I appreciate and support 737.
FollowupID:
673766