vehicle update

Submitted: Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:14
ThreadID: 78003 Views:2381 Replies:5 FollowUps:3
This Thread has been Archived
Hi everyone.

I am looking to update my 1981 fj45 and vehicles in my price range (about $15k) are limited. I had been keen on a late Jackaroo diesel with about 150000 kms. A mate of mine jokingly suggested I look at jeep wranglers of similar age to the Jackaroo but with much lower kms (seem to be a few around the 50000 - 70000 mark). I dont know a whole lot about the Jackaroos and I know very little about the Jeeps. I realise these are very different vehicles but I would love to hear peoples thoughts and experiences with these vehicles if possible.

Thanks

Brendan
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - The Bushwhackers -NSW - Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:11

Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:11
Hi Breno

I own a 3.0 TD Jackaroo, bloody brilliant car in most areas, with 1 major exception. The fuel system (injectors in particular) was a bad design, and even though they were recalled twice after the release of the car, they are still unreliable and very expensive to repair.

As an example, I had to get 1 injector replaced not long after I bought the car,(job done April 2009) cost approx. $950 inc. labour. I have since had a different problem (fuel rail sensor), and while in discussion with the Holden service manager, he mentioned that Isuzu will no longer supply 1 injector, only sets of 4, whether you need 4 or not, (dont need to be a mathematical genius to figure out the added cost of that repair!)

Damn shame, as the car is comfortable, fairly economical, will go most places the bigger 4wd's will go, (a lift and larger tyres recommended), and the right price for what you get. Also a good tow vehicle, within its limits. You would think that Isuzu would have gotten the injection right, (as I assumed), but sadly not. I believe the fuel system was a combined design effort between Isuzu and Cat.

A number of contributers to this forum have Jacks, and we all love them, but the petrol model is the generally accepted recommendation, but they are a bit thirsty.

Sorry, I know nothing of Jeeps, but thought I had better alert you to the potential problem with a T/D Jack.

Click on the 'my profile' link at the bottom of this message and you will see what I have got. Like I said, bloody terrific car in MOST areas.

Hope this info helps

Cheers, Dave

AnswerID: 414306

Follow Up By: Madfisher - Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 22:31

Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 22:31
Dave is spot on they are a great vehicle. The v6 can be a bit thirsty, but much less so then a 2f, but are very long lived and reliable. We have two v6s one auto, one man. The diff in economy is about 100k per tank between the man and auto.
I have seen a cost sheet for both v6 and the 3lt diesel and their is no diff over 20000ks as the diesel has very expensive filters and requires servicing twice as often.
Both of ours have been superb, just going to replace the orinigal shocks on mine at 161000ks.
Cheers Pete
0
FollowupID: 684621

Reply By: Member - William H (WA) - Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:45

Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:45
Morning breno.
Keep the fj45 and go and get a HJ60/61 toyota,or get the sarah in the 60 series which has the 12ht motor, if you live in Perth,they are easy to get a good one,or settle for an 80 series,parts are easy to get and you will still get one with a long life left in it.

Cheers for now...Williamh...Bunbury...WA.
AnswerID: 414327

Reply By: Member - Oldbaz. NSW. - Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 14:31

Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 14:31
I must agree with Bushwacker re the diesel Jack, no personal experience but a bit of anecdotal evidence around of their problems, a bloody shame really, but I can vouch for the 3.5 V6 version & you will get a cracker for $15k...a damn good
one for $10k. Can be thirsty if booted along, but I can get 15L/100 km towing a
C/t...IF kept under 100kph. Mines auto & I wouldnt bother with manual now.
Big, strong, roomy, only thing I have added is a LR tank. Still around with under 150k if you look hard enough...Ebay will give you a good guide.........oldbaz.
AnswerID: 414336

Follow Up By: Madfisher - Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 22:35

Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 22:35
Baz my old fj40 use to burn 20/100 towing a light boat, and 11mpg arround town what ever that is, use to burn more fuel then brothers 308 Statesman.
Cheers Pete
0
FollowupID: 684622

Reply By: MEMBER - Darian, SA - Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 18:06

Monday, Apr 26, 2010 at 18:06
Yep - had a turbo diesel 3.0L SE 99 Jack for 8 years - sturdy beasts alright - as mentioned, pity about the "issues" that many of the diesels have suffered due to Isuzu and Caterpillar being just a bit too clever with injection technology. Reports suggest the petrol is a good allrounder though - compared to others in the class, the transfer case reaches a bit too low. As for prices - it seems that Jacks are still under-rated in general, so there are probably lots off great units around at keen prices.
AnswerID: 414361

Reply By: breno - Sunday, May 02, 2010 at 18:18

Sunday, May 02, 2010 at 18:18
Thanks for the info everyone. Had been keen on the diesel until i looked into the injector problem further. Heart is set on a late petrol model now. Seem to be some good buys to be had. Another question for the Jackaroo people - Is it worth holding out for a later wide-track model. Is there a notable difference / advantage in these vehicles?

Thanks again,

Brendan
AnswerID: 415127

Follow Up By: Maîneÿ . . .- Sunday, May 02, 2010 at 19:21

Sunday, May 02, 2010 at 19:21
Brendan,

stick with a diesel motor, they will last and they are fuel efficient

Maîneÿ . . .
0
FollowupID: 685308

Sponsored Links