Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 19:28
Because I look at things from an application, circuit & systems POV, to me chargers & converters are the same in principle - ie, they enable up & down conversion etc. How their set point is achieved it IMO detail.
Circuit-wise, a dc-dc charged is a dc-dc converter. It just has the adjustable or (programmed) tracking output etc.
As I said, a dc-dc charger has no benefit for me. From similar calcs in the past, I know intuitively that even with a mere 70A alternator, my batteries charge faster without any dc-dc device.
And this 3-wire Hitachi goes to ~15.5V without its Sense wire connected, hence I can even keep Optima happy. (I'm not sure if ND (3-wire) alternators behave the same, but suspect that they do.)
For other 2 & 3 wire alternators, the usual voltage boosting methods work fine.
Hence I'm not going to spend $300 for something I can easily work around for a few dollars.
So if my solar & wind etc is insufficient to maintain batteries, I will charge from my fossil fueled beast to whatever current my alternator allows (no do-dc charger can increase that!). If that is insufficient, I will buy another alternator (probably $15 - $45 from wreckers) etc) which is a preference anyhow (I like redundancy and spares!).
If current limiting is required, I use cheaper solutions also.
I presume the Ranox & Radarc have settable max current limits for charging, and that that is separate to overall current (ie, a battery-charging current limit, but no limit to the loads off that battery)?
Thanks for the RAPS clarification.... For the price I expected more than a mere "raw" power distribution system.
FollowupID:
687787