Monday, May 31, 2010 at 11:10
Some solar panel brands have significantly different technology or can it be called 'types' with-in their range, some smaller companies just have the one 'type' of panel design, you have to compare various panels directly against each other, not just single out brands or types.
Yes, the amorphous panels will give less problems with shading, not nil problems but less, but on the other hand they are much less efficient initially, (7 Amp per sq mtr) of same physical size anyway.
But that has been done to death elsewhere on here anyway.
I've seen 1.1 Amp delivered from my system in totally overcast conditions when raining and the sun is not even visual, I would suggest not many panels can make that claim.
Some panels will even work *inside a tent* most won't, so it’s not the brand but the technology used in the panel that give the superior performance.
Maîneÿ . . .
FollowupID:
689064