Unprotected towbars
Submitted: Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:25
ThreadID:
80204
Views:
6765
Replies:
15
FollowUps:
10
This Thread has been Archived
Member - warren h (SA)
Hi all
A question on the legality of unprotected towbars. I know I have banged my leg many times on the protruding bar and now remove it when not being used. How do you stand legally by the R.T.A. and insurance companys if someone else injured themselves on your towbar? I see many bars on the back of vehicles unprotected, and in this current climate of people suing for the slightest thing wondered what the legal position is.
Thanks once again for any replies.
Cheers Warren.
Reply By: vk1dx - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:26
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:26
I have walked into both towbars and those horribly dangerour pushbike carriers. The tow bars have been mainly my fault as they dont stick out much. But the bike carrier was whwn I was talking to my grand son and just didn't look up. I suppose you could say its my fault also. So be it.
Wouldn't it be nice if the owners considered others and removed or folded them down. I think so. Our hitch is always removed and stashed in the car. A 5 second job.
Or isn't courtesy in peoples vocabulary. Who cares about the legality of it. Take it off.
Regarding the legality issue I would call the RTA and ask them. But then we wouldn't have anything on this
forum to chat about would we.
Phil
AnswerID:
424718
Follow Up By: Allan B, Sunshine Coast, - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:30
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:30
The following is a copy-and-paste from Queensland Transport page on Vehicle Modifications:
BICYCLE/WHEELCHAIR/ROOF RACKS
Tow bar mounted bicycle and wheelchair carrying racks
must be removed when not in use, unless specifically
approved to remain attached.
I would expect much the same from other States legislation.
But it does not seem to be much obeyed or policed.
These damn things are right at eye level and often with rather sharp edged brackets.
It is only a matter of time before someone loses an eye and sues the vehicle owner who is clearly negligent as it is unlawful by legislation and also probably not covered by insurance being an unlawful attachment.
FollowupID:
695180
Follow Up By: fisho64 - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 15:03
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 15:03
those regs dont say though whether that is only while the vehicle is being operated.
I wonder where it stands in terms of being parked, where this type of injury invariably occurs?
Normally a car is "unroadworthy" (canaried) if it is being operated rather than parked.
FollowupID:
695209
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 16:24
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 16:24
Why then in the ACT can you be defected when parked in a public
carpark!!!
FollowupID:
695219
Follow Up By: fisho64 - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 18:39
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 18:39
sorry wasnt aware of that, as I havent been to ACT and its not on the bucket list!
I imagine if thats the case though the police would only do it in certain circumstances as a car with a flat battery, flat tyre, etc are all deemed unroadworthy
FollowupID:
695234
Reply By: Hairs & Fysh - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:32
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:32
Hmm, Thats what your shin is for, to let you know you are to close to the vehicle.
Another
hazard is tradies utes/vans that have ladders, timber, piping and other over size objects on their roof racks. that protrude more than 1.2M. Got no idea how many times I've hit my melon on timber poking out the front of a ute that is nose in parked while walking along the foot path.
Being a chippie, I still get caught with one of the buggers, guess thats why I've got a head like a busted crab :)
AnswerID:
424733
Reply By: Honky - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:38
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:38
In NSW their is an act called Civil Liabilities act which states that you cannot sue for an obviuos risk.
ie is a normal person called have seen the pot hole but you didn't than it is your fault.
In my opinion if everyone leaves their tall ball on their car than it could be expected that you do not walk within a foot of that vehicle.
A duty of care may not be as high for an individual than say a corporation.
it would be different if the injury was a workers compensation claim
Regards
Honky
AnswerID:
424736
Reply By: Member - Tour Boy ( Bundy QLD) - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 16:26
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 16:26
I found that by having the huge Trigg hitch on my cruiser on a tongue that was long enough to clear the rear wheel carrier then no one hit me whilst
parking anymore.
While the vehicle was having it's 6 monthly pit inspection (public passenger vehicle NSW) the inspector hit his knee on it, looked at me and said nothing. I normally used to take it off for the HVIS inspection but forgot.
So I doubt that there is a reg in NSW for it. They did try to fail me once because the rear mudflaps were half and inch too short....they were factory...I won that arguement too eventually.
Cheers
Dave
AnswerID:
424756
Reply By: mechpete - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 20:49
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 20:49
Warren .
are you saying you don,t have a duty of care for your own safety .
next time you might be a bit more vigilant .
what happens when you bump into something around you own place
who are you going to sue .
mechpete
AnswerID:
424813
Follow Up By: Member - warren h (SA) - Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:53
Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:53
Mechpete,
I never said any such thing if you read my post you will see that I have said I NOW REMOVE THE TOWBAR to stop this happening and I dont know about you but I find it is easy to forget about the towbar when working around the vehicle for it is so low it is not in your line of vision and it is so easy to become distracted and bingo a sore shin.
I take responsibility for my own actions and have been in situations many timed where I could have sued but have never done so, this world is getting crazier by the minute and one of my pet hates is people who will not take responsibility for their own actions and this covers many areas.
All I was enquiring about was the legal implications if someone else damaged themselves on a protruding tow bar and also thought the responses may be of interest to fellow
forum members and it seems to have generated some interest if going by the amount of
views the post has generated.
Cheers warren.
FollowupID:
695304