UHF Aerial mounting on bullbars

Submitted: Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:40
ThreadID: 82062 Views:18347 Replies:11 FollowUps:3
This Thread has been Archived
Picked up a new Prado recently and have had an ARB bullbar fitted. Comes with two predrilled holes either side of the bar for aerials.
On the old bus, I had my aerial mounted on the left hand side, attached to the tubing with a U clamp. Worked ok.
Are there any pros and cons for locating the aerial on the tubing in preference to the predrilled holes on the bottom part of the bar, (aerial would be 3-400mm higher on the tubing), and is there any advantage in mounting on the RHS rather than the LHS.
Thanks in anticipation
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Malcolm (Townsville) - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:49

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:49
hi mepvic

I have a D-MAX with ARB steel winch bar. Same mounting holes as you.

When I had TWO antennae fitted (UHF and 3G) they mounted both on the nearside - one in the ARB hole and the other with a U clamp. The reason they said was so I didn't have antennae in my face whilst driving.

First trip SWMBO complained about the antennae wobbling (TSV to CNS trip) so I cut some 25mm black poly pipe and slid over the spring base then some black tape to stop water collecting inside. It seems to be OK now but with hindsight I think I would have used two U clamps right over to the left side.

mal
living the 'good life'

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 433872

Reply By: Holiday Hound - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:49

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:49
We had an aerial mounted on a GME bracket fixed with U - bolts to the bar on a Prado with ARB bar. After about 1000km on outback corrugations the bracket broke apart (stainless steel plate snapped right at the 90 degree bend).

The aerial is now mounted on the LHS on the pre-drilled holes. No bracket - one less thing which can break.
AnswerID: 433873

Reply By: ben_gv3 - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:56

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:56
With the pre-drilled hole at the bottom you lose signal as it's being shielded by the bullbar, bonnet, car bady etc. With being mounted up higher you should get slightly better reception.

AFAIK it's illegal to mount aerials on the RHS due to visbility. I could be wrong though.
AnswerID: 433874

Reply By: Member - Boobook - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:49

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:49
If you mount your antenna on the bottom part of your bullbar you will increase the SWR ( standing wave ratio) of your antenna set up. This is very bad.

I have a SWR meter and tried it with the antenna on the base of the bull bar. I got a SWR of 2.8. Then I moved it to the top rail and the SWR went down to 1.1

On the SWR scale for UHF's, 1 is fantastic, 1.2 - 1.5 is ok, 1.8-2.0 is getting to be a problem, 2.5-2.9 is a big problem and at 3 or more you should not transmit as it may cause harm to your CB.

To give you an idea, at SWR 2.8, of the 5 watts, 3 watts bounce back to the UHF and only 2 watts are transmitted to the air. Ie it's like you have a 1 - 2 watt CB or less.

So the con's are that you will reduce your range by up to 60% and could you wreck your UHF. Apart from that it is fine ;-)
AnswerID: 433879

Reply By: outback epicurean - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:51

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:51
Hi

Need to be careful with aerials on the bullbars of Prado's. Because of the way the suspension is fitted, there is more movement in the BB and many "normal" antenna can't hack it. Ours snapped off on the GRR. The worst ones seem to be the single spring at the bottom type. When we spoke with a dealer in Broome he said to use a double spring model. Did this and all is OK to date. Moral of the story Make sure you talk to a auto electrician that knows how hard these things will work on rough roads
AnswerID: 433880

Reply By: Member - Andrew L (WA) - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 15:26

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 15:26
I originally had a Toyota bullbar on my Prado with the UHF aerial mounted on the top loop. When I changed to an ARB bullbar I mounted the aerial in the predrileld hole on the bar.
I have had no noticable change in UHF performance.

Leachy
AnswerID: 433899

Follow Up By: Holiday Hound - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 21:57

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 21:57
I agree, I have no noticeable change in performance since mounting the aerial in the pre-drilled holes, compared to having it on a bracket previously.

HH
0
FollowupID: 704945

Reply By: Member - Russler - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 19:03

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 19:03
I've heard it's a good idea to scrape a bit of the paint away from the pre-drilled holes on the bull bar antenna brackets, to ensure a good ground/connectivity.

Getting the antenna as high as possible is a plus. Getting it off the bullbar, and perhaps mounted on a gutter or roofrack even better, but then ya need to keep an eye on the overhanging branches.
AnswerID: 433918

Follow Up By: Stu & "Bob" - Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 20:12

Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 20:12
Russler,
That is dependant on whether you are using a ground plane independant antenna or not. Using a ground plane independant, it makes no difference what the antenna is bolted to, metal wood fibreglass, whatever.

HTH
0
FollowupID: 705021

Reply By: Wilko - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 20:51

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 20:51
Hi Mepvic,

Ive got a ground independent aerial and I mount mine on the bar tubing. Mine has gone down some rough corrugated tracks and has never once broken. It has been installed for at least 11 years.

Cheers Wilko
AnswerID: 433930

Reply By: SDG - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 23:02

Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 23:02
One thing I was told years ago, so not sure if correct today, is that the brackets can give you more choice in mounting aerial wire away from any electricals under the bonnet that may cause interference.
AnswerID: 433939

Reply By: Flynnie - Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 00:30

Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 00:30
I reckon there are often better solutions than bullbar mounting such as gutter, roof or roofrack mounting.

In my limited experience of these things I have found my short gutter mounted antenna gives better and more consistent transmission and reception than most bullbar mounted antennas. On the CSR I noticed many vehicles, with bullbar mounted antennas, were more or less radio blind to the rear. They could only copy at quite a close distance. Others with bullbar mounted antennas had good coverage. What made the difference I don't know. Many times I was the lead vehicle and could communicate with other groups a long way to the rear when closer vehicles could not even hear them.

A short roof or gutter mounted antenna is also likely to be more trouble free than a bullbar mounted antenna.

Flynnie
AnswerID: 433944

Reply By: mepvic - Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 08:26

Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 08:26
Thanks to all for your replies. Interesting cross section. Think I will reuse my spring loaded base on the tubing. Have had it there on other vehicles and not had any problems with reception. Done some rough tracks and trips without any damage. Have noticed that the bullbar on the Prado does move a bit so will be interested to see how the aerial vibrates on the bar. Heading over to WA in a week or so. Should be a good test. Thanks again.
AnswerID: 433956

Follow Up By: Member - Ian H (NSW) - Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 16:58

Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 16:58
If I have problems I go to the manufacturer for help. Have a look at the GME website for the correct ay to mount an aerial and you will find the best spot is in the middle of the roof so long as there is no roof rack or bars.
If there is then mount it on the rack using a ground independant aerial for best results.
We travel with one particular Prado and his is just a magnetic base short aerial mounted ahead of his rack and it does very well, better than bull bar mounted ones.
Don't take my word for it, look at GME site.
0
FollowupID: 704998

Sponsored Links