UHF Aerial mounting on bullbars
Submitted: Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:40
ThreadID:
82062
Views:
17959
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
3
This Thread has been Archived
mepvic
Picked up a new Prado recently and have had an ARB bullbar fitted. Comes with two predrilled holes either side of the bar for aerials.
On the old bus, I had my aerial mounted on the left hand side, attached to the tubing with a U clamp. Worked ok.
Are there any pros and cons for locating the aerial on the tubing in preference to the predrilled holes on the bottom part of the bar, (aerial would be 3-400mm higher on the tubing), and is there any advantage in mounting on the RHS rather than the LHS.
Thanks in anticipation
Reply By: Member - Malcolm (Townsville) - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:49
Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:49
hi mepvic
I have a D-MAX with ARB steel winch bar. Same mounting holes as you.
When I had TWO antennae fitted (UHF and 3G) they mounted both on the nearside - one in the ARB hole and the other with a U clamp. The reason they said was so I didn't have antennae in my face whilst driving.
First trip SWMBO complained about the antennae wobbling (TSV to CNS trip) so I cut some 25mm black poly pipe and slid over the spring base then some black tape to stop water collecting inside. It seems to be OK now but with hindsight I think I would have used two U clamps right over to the left side.
mal
AnswerID:
433872
Reply By: Member - Boobook - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:49
Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:49
If you mount your antenna on the bottom part of your bullbar you will increase the SWR ( standing wave ratio) of your antenna set up. This is very bad.
I have a SWR meter and tried it with the antenna on the base of the bull bar. I got a SWR of 2.8. Then I moved it to the top rail and the SWR went down to 1.1
On the SWR scale for UHF's, 1 is fantastic, 1.2 - 1.5 is ok, 1.8-2.0 is getting to be a problem, 2.5-2.9 is a big problem and at 3 or more you should not transmit as it may cause harm to your CB.
To give you an idea, at SWR 2.8, of the 5 watts, 3 watts bounce back to the UHF and only 2 watts are transmitted to the air. Ie it's like you have a 1 - 2 watt CB or less.
So the con's are that you will reduce your range by up to 60% and could you wreck your UHF. Apart from that it is fine ;-)
AnswerID:
433879
Reply By: outback epicurean - Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:51
Friday, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:51
Hi
Need to be careful with aerials on the bullbars of Prado's. Because of the way the
suspension is fitted, there is more movement in the BB and many "normal" antenna can't hack it. Ours snapped off on the GRR. The worst ones seem to be the single spring at the bottom type. When we spoke with a dealer in
Broome he said to use a double spring model. Did this and all is OK to date. Moral of the story Make sure you talk to a auto electrician that knows how hard these things will work on rough roads
AnswerID:
433880
Reply By: Flynnie - Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 00:30
Saturday, Oct 23, 2010 at 00:30
I reckon there are often better solutions than bullbar mounting such as gutter, roof or roofrack mounting.
In my limited experience of these things I have found my short gutter mounted antenna gives better and more consistent transmission and reception than most bullbar mounted antennas. On the CSR I noticed many vehicles, with bullbar mounted antennas, were more or less radio blind to the rear. They could only copy at quite a close distance. Others with bullbar mounted antennas had good coverage. What made the difference I don't know. Many times I was the lead vehicle and could communicate with other groups a long way to the rear when closer vehicles could not even hear them.
A short roof or gutter mounted antenna is also likely to be more trouble free than a bullbar mounted antenna.
Flynnie
AnswerID:
433944