MAGELLAN TRITION 500 OR GARMIN OREGON 200

Hi all.

I am about to buy a handheld gps and was tossing up between the Magellan trition 500 and the Garmin Oregon 200. the Magellan has a built in base map of Australia and the garmin has both city and Topo maps. The Magellan is around $185 and the Garmin is around $250. Any thoughts and advice would be appreciated.

Cheers
Kelvin
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: The Explorer - Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 20:47

Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 20:47
Hi - Magellan basemap is useless...so if you need maps you'll most likely be up for more $. You can get free detiled maps for Garmin (OSM). Garmin battery life is better. Garmin Oregon 200 has been discontinued - I think. Tritons are also on the out with release of the new eXplorist series. Not sure if this is an issue in either case.

Cheers
Greg
I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message
Moderator

AnswerID: 434565

Reply By: Mick O - Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:21

Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:21
Go the Garmin. Both very heavy on Batteries though. Cheers Mick
''We knew from the experience of well-known travelers that the
trip would doubtless be attended with much hardship.''
Richard Maurice - 1903

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 434568

Follow Up By: The Explorer - Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 23:28

Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 23:28
Hi

Claimed battery life for Triton 500 is 8-10hrs, Garmin Oregon 200 is 16 hours. Both take AA's (Alkaline, Lithium or rechargables - NiMH or Lithium recommended).

Not sure of the defintion of "heavy" battery use. I suppose any classification is relative and dependant on mode of use. Bottom line is that the Garmin is likely to be better on batteries than the Magellan. New Garmins (78 and 62 series) claim 20 hrs and the new Magellan Explorist series 15 hours....so the Garmin Oregon is still pretty good, relatively speaking, compared to other handhelds and maybe not "heavy" at all.

Cheers
Greg
I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 705645

Follow Up By: Mick O - Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:26

Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:26
G'day Greg,

I've been using the E-trex Vista for a couple of years now and have found its battery life to be excellent. We compared it this year to an Oregon 200 that was running in the vehicle as well and found the 200 to be hungry on the batteries. Probably only two thirds the time that the E-trex had and even less if you were doing a lot of playing with the various functions. Even so you have to preface that with the fact that even two thirds equates to a good couple of days in the bush with full time use during daylight hours or greater if using sporadically to check position only. Good units though.

Cheers Mick
''We knew from the experience of well-known travelers that the
trip would doubtless be attended with much hardship.''
Richard Maurice - 1903

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 705673

Follow Up By: The Explorer - Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:09

Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:09
...so was that the Vista Vista HCx or the Vista H. Vista Hcx has a quoted battery life of 25 hrs!! Probably best handheld battery life on market (along with the Legend HCx)...though my TwoNav Aventura has ~30+hrs (but it uses 3000mAh rechargable and is a tad more expensive..so different market slot).

Always difficult to compare battery life on different units as a range of variables such as type of battery being used (make, mAh, age, degree of initial charge, ambient temp) and then GPS set up (screen brightness, screen saver settings, digital compass on/off etc etc). Some people will have a bad day and blame it on the type of unit when in reality some other issue.

One of the first units I used way back in the ealry 90's (Magellan 5000 Nav) took 6 AA's and only lasted about 3 hrs!! So current range of GPS units are all pretty good by comparison...plus you can use rechargables so not really an issue unless youre backpacking for days on end and cant carry many spares. Obviously when using it in the car external power is the go.

Cheers
Greg


I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 705686

Follow Up By: Mick O - Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 17:26

Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 17:26
Vista HcX. Mick
''We knew from the experience of well-known travelers that the
trip would doubtless be attended with much hardship.''
Richard Maurice - 1903

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 705708

Reply By: Member - MYPRADO - Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:39

Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:39
Where can you buy Garmin at $250 prices i saw over $400
Cheers.
AnswerID: 434570

Follow Up By: wilco318 - Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 22:05

Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 22:05
From here

http://stores.ebay.com.au/HOTSPOT-DEALS-STORE?_rdc=1

Last one went at auction for $275, the previous went for $256
0
FollowupID: 705636

Follow Up By: Member - MYPRADO - Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 22:28

Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 22:28
Thanks
0
FollowupID: 705638

Reply By: OzTroopie - Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 23:44

Friday, Oct 29, 2010 at 23:44
Hi Wilco,

I've always had a good run with Garmin.

Looks like the Oregon 200 series has been superseded by the 450 series. Still, at that price, why not go the 200 series (the entry level 450 series sells for approx $549).

Touchscreen phones/gps units with big colour displays will always use more energy than their small screen greyscale counterparts. Nothing to worry about, just keep a few spare AAs ready to go, and/or invest in the 12V vehicle power cable.

With 1000 waypoints, 50 routes and 200 saved tracks the Oregon 200 series is still fantastic value. The new 450 series units have similar specs, the main difference being a built in electric compass (not highly accurate inside a metal car anyway) and extra waypoints on the high end model.

Remember with this like waypoints and tracks, you can always save them to computer and only upload the ones you need to the GPS (using a program such as OziExplorer). So while the GPS may only hold 1000 waypoints, you could have thousands on file.

Cheers,


OzTroopie

AnswerID: 434579

Follow Up By: The Explorer - Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 00:50

Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 00:50
Hi

The Garmin Oregon 200 has simply been discontinued - I dont think its been superceded. The 450 has superceded the 400 (released at the same time as the 200). Main documented difference between the new *50 series and the old *00 series is an increase in the number of waypoints (1000 up to 2000), Routes (50 to 200) and tracks (20 saved tracks to 200)...though not sure if this has been the result of software updates or hardware changes.

Cheers
Greg
I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 705646

Reply By: The other Norm C (WA) - Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:03

Saturday, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:03
G'Day Kelvin
I bought a Magellan Triton 500 off E-Bay (refurbished with Aust Base map) for around the $185 dollar mark about 4 months ago.With the unit sitting on the dash it never made it out of the State before having an internal hemmorraige (Error)You may have more luck with yours but next time I think I'II buy from a proper shop.
Norm
AnswerID: 434582

Sponsored Links