Monday, Nov 17, 2003 at 15:45
Chris,
I tend to agree with Pathfinder -
mine was serviced as per Manufacturer recommendations by Nissan dealers. Certainly any engine should be able to handle reasonable demands and some abuse. There are many motors of this size in the 2-3 tonne truck class which give sterling service and work a lot harder than your average fourby.
There is a fault which seems to have been rectified in the GU3, predominantly by changes to the oil gallery system. I have heard of many more than 15 - One govt dept in NW NSW had 13 at last count (not the
police)
In other comments here I referred to Government &
Police vehicles - I meant that they click up the K's faster and hence are amongst the first to be seen with problems. The GU2 was released May 2000 and the sump recall was in December 2000. Obviously there were some high milers that had failed by then.
The overboost noted could be something to do with blowback through the hole -
mine went at 110kph on the freeway and it felt like the vehicle wanted to bolt for a while. The blow back would happen because the hole in the piston would be forcing air from the sump in on the downstroke for intake with the intake valves open. This could
well overide the boost from the turbo. The initial symptom was a rattle like pinking and then the attempted bolt away. The motor continued to run albeit as Roly has described.
I would appreciate any comments regarding high mileage GU3's - there should be some around the 150k mark by now.
Pete G
FollowupID:
27199