4x4 Licence
Submitted: Tuesday, Nov 18, 2003 at 22:01
ThreadID:
8613
Views:
2356
Replies:
14
FollowUps:
21
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Eric
I had the opportunity today , to listen to a veriety of poli's about why 4x4 drivers should get a licence ..........
After listening for a while to there reasons , I must say I agree with them now ...
The main reason I agree , is because once we all get a licence , our 4x4's will shrink to the size of Mini's , and we wont block people's
views anymore . Another good reason is because our vehicles will become softer , Foam actually , and we wont even dint other cars . Some Semi's will turn to glass , and we will be able to see straight through them .
We are a terible breed of people us 4x4 owners , is what I realised today . We all turn up to street drags on Friday night . Speed in side streets with our boosted turbo chargers and nitro burners , we hang out at car washes in the middle of the night . We all have removed out cats and fitted 12" exaust pipes ........
What ! thats not us????? ok thats the Jap crap hair drier vehicles .
Sorry about the drible guys, still upset with the clowns i spoke with today , had to write my 10 cents worth
Venus Bay
Reply By: Tim - Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:55
Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:55
Sorry but I have to strongly disagree.
I won't crap on with various reasons, I'll just use 1 perfect example.
The government/public minority groups were against jet skis which could be ridden with a normal boat licence. They now have a licence just for jet skis, has tht solved any problems? No.
Some jet skiers (not all) are still driving round like d*ckheads, and I think the same would happen with a 4WD licence, it won't solve any problems, it won't get rid of the cowboys it will just be something else to pay for every year.
Tim
AnswerID:
37791
Follow Up By: Member - Alan- Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:24
Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:24
Couldn't agree more Tim, licencing is generally only used as a further revenue raser and nothing else. Keep the bloody pollies and bureaucrats out of our pockets as much as we can, we're restricted enough as it is.
Look at the huge amount of police time and our money spent on buybacks and other licencing requirements on sporting shooters, does that stop the crooks and idiots from buying or using stolen legal, or illegal guns for criminal purposes? Of course it doesn't.
The latest figures from yet another inquiry/report in WA shows that 75% of unlicenced drivers continue to drive anyway. So what will they do to change that? Probaly introduce more unpoliced and unenforcable restrictions which will have little or no effect at all on those that they're meant for, because they simply do not obey rules and regulations.
Please, no more suggestions advocating yet more garbage from those useless pollies we have so many of!
FollowupID:
27396
Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 15:39
Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 15:39
One country in Europe, it takes 6 mths and $4000 to get your license.. Cant remember where, but you have to drive in all conditions, rain, etc, change flat tires, change oil, general basic maintance..
Then they also do the skid pan, etc... proper
driver training. not how to drive around
the block.
But I can see a 4x4 license being backed by ever 4x4 driver trainer on the planet. Its a gold
mine for them... 100,000 4x4 on the road, average of 4 drivers each cost of $400 per course, Talk about a retirement fund.. About $160,000,000
With the problem still being the same, what difference is there in a 4x4 or car? What other things are you going to show a kid? Go slower around a corner as they are higher, brake earlier as they dont stop as
well as a GSXR 1000???
There is not that much difference in a Commode and a 4x4 to drive ON THE ROAD.. Offroad yes, lots of difference, but thats not what this is about. Its street driving thats the problem.
Then with less sales of 4x4 prices of new 4b's will skyrocket, most models wont be brought into the country anymore as there will be less demand, less options, insurance costs will rocket, its all bad as I see it.
I see no advantage at all in a 4x4 license.
AnswerID:
37824
Reply By: Murfa - Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 19:23
Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 19:23
Hi guy's
Sorry to argue your point here, but i'm a 23 male. Have earned every penny, and am onto my 3rd car now, not because of accidents, but by earing the money, working and upgrading. I have purchsed my first 4wd a mitsubishi challenger 2002 model last year, but my mates and i have been going away for years now in there 4wds. We treat the tracks, frazer, morton etc with the upper most respect. I would just like to say, it has nothing to do with age, it is a mentality factor. Have you seen the way motorbikes ride on our road, zipping in and out of traffic, driving up between two cars on the unbroken line to the front, and speeding off when they change, and the street drags, hot heads.......as if a 4wd could compete in a street drag....... Maybe the police should use some of there speeding fine revenue towards hotting up there cars to be able to keep up with the street drags, catching them and fining them for causing the trouble.
Sorry, once again a small minority is destroying it for the rest of us.
AnswerID:
37846
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 21:44
Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 21:44
"Have you seen the way motorbikes ride on our road, zipping in and out of traffic, driving up between two cars on the unbroken line to the front, and speeding off when they change"
Having ridden and raced bikes for 20 years, I would like to argue that being at the front of the lights is the safest place to be, then get the hell away from the insane morons in cages... is it more the point your pist that they get infront of you?
Ive had mates killed by pricks not realizing the light was red and squashing them between the car infront of the bike and the **nt in the car..
"as if a 4wd could compete in a street drag....... "
LOL, you havent seen a few of the 200kw GQs around Epping way have you! LMAO! The looks on Ginos face as he gets toasted by a 2 ton GQ.!!!!
FollowupID:
27465
Follow Up By: Hedonist - Thursday, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:17
Thursday, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:17
There is more than a little commonsense in what you say Murfa - It is the attitude and ability of the driver that counts, not their age.
I don't agree with your conclusion, but focusing on the behaviours that cause the problem is a much more helpful (and mature) response than just 'stirring the pot'.
Personaly I would like to see more emphasis given to
driver training - as a long time bike rider myself I would like to see compulsory motorbike licences as a pre-requisite to a learners permit for a car - you become a lot more aware of other people on the road without two tonnes of steel to protect you... if you survive of course ;-)
Cheers,
Pete
FollowupID:
27485
Reply By: UB.1 - Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 22:49
Wednesday, Nov 19, 2003 at 22:49
Hello all
As a qualified motorcycle instructor of 14 years, ex truckie - local & interstate, and driver averaging 30,000k each year, I think we all need to
cool down and stop getting mad; then start getting political and gaining some justice.
When compulsory rider training was introduced in most states in the late 80s early 90s it reduced the number of fatal accidents amongst first year riders by 70%. This gave the polies something to attempt to justify better training or specialised licencing with but they warped it as usual.
At the time the polies agreed to phase in better quality
driver training for all road users. It never happened because it would lose too many votes from Joe Public.
Instead we got half baked changes to P plates and mickey mouse log book systems for L drivers to gain their licences without thorough training or reasonable guided experiences. For years anyone could declare themselves a "Driving Instructor". Today any adult can "instruct" a relative or friend or stranger in the finer arts of driving providing they don't charge a fee or call themselves an instructor!
At the same time it got harder to get a motorcycle, bus, truck or taxi licence.
The reality is that most accidents are caused by inexperienced drivers. No matter how long they have held a licence most drivers have limited experience and panic in an unfamiliar situation.
The only
solution is quality instruction of all new drivers by qualified and reqularly examined driving instructors. This must be accompanied by regular testing of drivers - it could be once every 5 years for example - but it must be regular and systematic. It won't be popular with Joe Public but it will save lives, injuries and reduce hospital waiting lists. It will also take the heat off 4wds as it is not we who cause most accidents but we are an easy target.
How many of us actually got their licence in a 4wd? I know I didn't and neither will most 4wders EVER. Let's ensure the basic training is quality before any more minorities are targeted.
I'm interested in your constructive
feedback but not half-baked knee-jerk reactions or blaming others. Let's join together and really exert some influence on improving the driving in
Australia. WE CAN DO THIS THROUGH THESE FORUMS, HASSLING POLITICIANS, USING THE LOCAL MOTORING CLUBS AND ASSOCIATIONS - heck even the press and media.
Remember its the motorcyclists and professional drivers who have the toughest road to obtain their licences today. Are we next or should it be everyone evenly and fairly?
AnswerID:
37877
Follow Up By: Brett - Thursday, Nov 20, 2003 at 00:45
Thursday, Nov 20, 2003 at 00:45
Forget about the license and think about the civil liberty or the rduction of civil liberties you PRO license garbage are sponsoring. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Do women in
Tarago vans need a different License and if the get your new license will that allow them to drive a Rav 4 or will they need another one.
As I said .........wake up
FollowupID:
27484
Follow Up By: Member - Alan- Thursday, Nov 20, 2003 at 18:35
Thursday, Nov 20, 2003 at 18:35
As I said before, forget about additional licencing as it's totally unnessecary, and will be used only as an additional revenue raiser by the pollies and bureaucrats.
Virtually no one on the roads whatever they drive, shows any consideration whatsoever for anyone else on that same road!
For instance, loads of cyclists also drive cars but does that make them anymore responsible for the way they ride their bikes? Does it hell, most of them show a complete disregard for the fact that they are the most vunerable beings on that road, they know the probs. that drivers are faced with, yet they still act as if they have a death wish!
Yes, younger drivers full of testosterone do behave erractically and dangerously, but what excuse have the rest got for acting in such pig ignorant ways.
Better policing by better police drivers than are about at present may eventually make a difference, and so will better education, but it'll be a long job getting the arrogant, ignorant and incompetent drivers off the road whatever they drive, and more licences won't do it!
FollowupID:
27526