Friday, May 27, 2011 at 12:31
Hi Nick B, I'm not going to argue with you, I have had this discussion too many times over the last few weeks! You are probably right, but at the end of the day rules is rules. Here is one of the
places the Technical guys at DoT looked at ...
Vehicle Standards Bulletin 14, section LS Tyres, rims,
suspension and steering (Jan 2011)
This says in one place : " Replacement wheels must be designed for the particular hub/axle and have the same bolt/stud pitch circle diameter and the same centre location method."
They also referred to the 'Universal Tyre Fitment Guide' which says something similar - I think it refers to centre hole size rather than 'centre locatiuon method'. The bit that says 'must be designed for the particular hub/axle' is very clear - obviously a 105mm hole has NOT been designed for a 67mm hub.
The RAC in WA advised me that using the larger hole rim would not be legal or wise.
Perhaps predictably Mitsubishi state that only genuine parts should be used, which is not particularly helpful but falls in line with the DoT and the RAC.
I ended up with rims on my camper (and two spares provided with the camper) with the correct stud pattern, offset, and rolling circumference to fit the Pajero, albeit illegally, so that if I am stuck out in
the desert somewhere I have the option of saying stuff the law, I want to get out of here!
The Pajero spares however cannot physically be fitted to the camper.
Nick F
FollowupID:
728520