Sunday, Jun 19, 2011 at 21:48
Jason, it's not a matter of winning or losing. We can minimise impact by selecting lower remnant products and/or packaging. That's not what I'm talking about. If in a "natural"or wilderness area it is much harder to manage impact. Just as important to most (but less considered) is the experiential aspect of camping. Even those on this site I would personally consider inconsiderate seem to want to be in a more natural and wilderness like setting. By maintaining this experience for as many people as possible we can enhance everybody's camping.
No argument we have to learn to manage our waste, but this is a travel and camping
forum and I'm responding accordingly.
When studying
Recreation Management (yes, I know. I've turned many against me because of the word studying) it became clear that the experience of a recreational activity is as important as any actual event. By enhancing the experience we can help everyone get the most of their recreational activities. Taking a personal benefit approach (I'm fine, stuff everyone else- you hear this often in responses of those who say we are over governed) can detract from everyone's
recreation and add to the chorus of (often unreasonable) promoters of recreational bans and limitations.
Going by your last statement it appears we agree more than disagree.
Cheers,
Mark
FollowupID:
731241