ANOTHER Hand grenade goes bang.....
Submitted: Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 02:51
ThreadID:
91214
Views:
5943
Replies:
13
FollowUps:
19
This Thread has been Archived
Tim
Some people may say it was exactly to schedule. A really
well looked after 3L GU, 150K on the clock and sure enough, there goes the head, just as numerous posts before me have stated.
It's never over heated or been flogged trying to drive up cliffs or giant sand dunes. I can also say it's not a mate of a mate etc etc.
Anyway, the new tojo has just arrived and another person is now converted for ever.
For anyone else thinking about running the risk of buying a GU (and a real risk it is) my advice is don't go anywhere near it.
Tim
Reply By: Rockape - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:35
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:35
Tim,
They are going to trial some new Ford Rangers here at work (both surface and underground).
They will still be buying Tojo's as the main fleet but they are always on the
lookout for something that may do the job much cheaper. Price is around 2.5 Rangers to 1 Tojo but that will just be a trial price.
Head of LV maintence told me that Rio have signed up for 100 Mahindras.
He also told me they will not even look at Nissans.
Have a good one,
RA.
AnswerID:
474937
Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:30
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:30
Not sure of the Mahindra decision, as whilst they are good value, the plastic interior will not last one week in the mines situation. The door handles will break as they are not very rugged.
We hit a too the other morning in ours and the door skin popped off and jammed, even though the impact zone was on the steel bullbar.
Good value for many reasons, just not in your environment imo.
Andrew
FollowupID:
749923
Reply By: tuck - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:16
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:16
What year was your Nissan
AnswerID:
474940
Follow Up By: Tim - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:23
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:23
The build date was end of 2004 bought new at the start of 05.
FollowupID:
749932
Reply By: Robin Miller - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:29
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:29
Hi Tim
Always sad to here those stories - espically when it ones own.
Problem is that people associate a generic name to a model with unacceptable failures.
I would be interested to here how many onwers of other brands have such confidence in there new cars such that they do not even take them back for servicing from new, as is the case with my GU (Petrol).
They take them back for sevicing based on the fear that there warranty may be void and impicit in this is that the warranty will be needed.
AnswerID:
474941
Follow Up By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:03
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:03
G/Day Robin
I still haven't wiped the smile off my face since we changed over.
We just got back from a 2000k trip towing the van roughly around 2800kgs.
No more struggling up hills, we can easily sit the posted speed if required ect.
I sat on around 90 to 95ks most times.
Fuel consumption around 19ltrs per 100ks, better than 22ltrs to 26ltrs per 100ks with the 3ltr patrol.
FollowupID:
749931
Reply By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:52
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:52
We had a 2008 3ltr crd Patrol from new.
I was one of the non believers, absolutely loved it.
Used it for towing caravans ect, struggled on hills and passing slower vehicles.
Last trip away we picked up some contaminated fuel and then the dramas began.
Nissan dealership at Mt Isa said repairs required to common rail system and injector pump.
The vehicle had just done over 30 thousand ks.
Doubtful if manufacturers warranty would cover repair cost re: caused by contaminated fuel, estimated cost $13K to $15K.
In the back of my mind I was also thinking about any future problems such as the Grenade issues.
To cut a long story short, we traded it on new 4.8 ltr petrol Patrol.
It's a totally different vehicle re: performance / handling / comfort.
In my mind the 3ltr common rail motors are little engines for big trucks.
Cheers
AnswerID:
474943
Follow Up By: Shaver - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:11
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:11
Handling & comfort, it's the same vehicle with a 6 in it ! Obviously didn't take a 200 for a drive. Yes I know brand loyalty & not willing to spend extra $'s.
FollowupID:
749941
Follow Up By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:52
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:52
Geez Shaver
You are so right, of course it's not a 200 series.
I am comparing the later model 4.8 ltr with the 2008 3ltr model
*The difference is larger brake diameter.
*Front and rear
suspension changes.
*Five speed auto transmission with manual shift mode.
*Various bits of interior changes.
Over the years we have had a mixture of various 4wds including several togos.
But maybe i'm a bit old fashion and like to have a front diff and chassis.
As far as the $$ go it didn't come into the equation.
Don't assume things about other people unless you know the full facts.
FollowupID:
749942
Follow Up By: Shaver - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:37
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:37
Lighten up a bit Daza you take things too seriously ! Are you saying the 200 doesn't have a chassis or front diff ? And by the way, I happen to live & fly in Qld & if you want to pose in a aircraft,
the pilot sits on the left & usually keeps one hand on the throttle most times. Cheers & have a nice day !
FollowupID:
749945
Follow Up By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:55
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:55
Nah the
Cook was in
the pilot seat I was posing beside her.
No wonder she couldn't get it off the ground then, she is left handed.
I'll have to complain to Qantas next time we are at
Longreach.
FollowupID:
749946
Reply By: anglepole - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:02
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:02
Hi Tim,
What I find bewildering is the impression that only Patrols have problems. I was in a Toyota 4WD drive club for years, and I can assure you that the brand had its fair share of serious problems. A search of 4X4 forums will show that many Prados have also had head failures.
We had Patrols and Landcruisers at work and the Cruiser had endless trouble with oil from the transfer case filling up the gearbox. It was never fixed.
I hope you have a trouble free and enjoyable time with your new Toyota.
AnswerID:
474944
Follow Up By: Member - Krakka - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:00
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:00
Anglepole, the oil from the transfer case filling up the gearbox, is this an isolated case? I have never heard of it before.
The 3lt Nissan problem is overwhelmingly a very common and massively expensive one to fix.
Sure, all vehicles have some probs, but not on the scale of the 3lt Nissan.
FollowupID:
749938
Follow Up By: Shaver - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:03
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:03
anglepole
That could have been fixed with a $20 By - Pass Hose !
FollowupID:
749939
Follow Up By: Motherhen - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 15:25
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 15:25
Certainly not an isolated case Krakka - someone here will probably know the manufacture range years that it was needed with. Bypass hose just about the standard with Cruisers during those years - you learn after replacing the seal a few times. Cruiser gearbox failures pretty high on our list too.
After a number of Cruisers, we have had one only Patrol; January 2002. Nudging 170,000 and has had no mechanical problems at all - it would have to be our most reliable vehicle. Ours also took our heavy caravan all around Tasmania.
Sorry to hear of yours Tim - there are too many of them going, but certainly not all. Disappointing to see yours is one of the later models than the series with the bad record.
Motherhen
FollowupID:
749948
Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 20:34
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 20:34
The gearbox/transfer oil problem was fixed 21 years ago in the Landcruiser wagons and a little later in the 75series.
FollowupID:
749976
Reply By: Patrol22 - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:15
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:15
Yep one shouldn't assume that toyotas don't have their fair share of problems.....and equally crappy responses from the manufacturer in terms of warranty.
....and just for the conspiracy theorists.....despite my screen name I DO NOT own a Nissan Patrol :-)
Some interesting reading:
Oh what a Lemon - 200 SeriesMore than a couple of landcruiser complaints
Likewise you will find similar complaints about other marques of vehicles including the Patrol, Landrover etc etc....IMHO any electro-mechanical device is subject to failure from time to time and equally IMHO there are not sufficient quality mechanics around to diagnose and fix problems. Also we have some of the crappiest diesel storage facilities in the world in Australia and this doesn't help with modern CRDI engines. Not saying we should put up with this mind you but rather that there are many more things contributing to the mix of "failures" than the oft used phrase "another hand grenade goes bang...."
AnswerID:
474952
Reply By: The Bantam - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 15:49
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 15:49
AH yeh we get this other brands thing all the time.
When there is a brand or item that has known regular and common issues, like the hand grenade patrolls, someone allways pipes up and says the market leader is having their problems too.
The reality is the market leader..in this case Toyota, is having far less problems and have a hell of a lot more vehicles on the road.
The problem is that the 4 cylinder common rail patrolls when they fail it is catestrophic and if it is not under waranty it more or less renders the vehicle beyond economic repair.
The fact that other brands are having problems does not change the fact that the 4 cylinder common rail partolls seem to have a conspicuous problem.
There is no way I would expect to pay $60Gorillas for a new vehicle and then get a bill for 1/4 of that for a repair regardless of the cause.
By the time it happens, that probably represents half the market value of the vehicle.
As for the whole common rail diesel thing.....NUP..ya wont get me buying one any brand any time soon.
Even if the fuel is a bit dodgy.....the product should be able to cope with ALL normally available commercial fuel.
There was a bloke on 4wd action a whole ago that baught a new excavator...it came with a common rail diesel, very similar to the one in his 4wd.........this raised the question why his 4wd was not equiped with fuel filtration to the standard in his excavator.....ie multistage, with 2 disposable eliments and probably another in the fuel pump.
We have had BRP blaiming fuel contamination for the reguar injector failures in it ETEC range......obviously either the factory supplied fuel filrtation is inadequate or the injection system in incapable of dealing with the normal variation in the commercially available fuels used.
And all this in the name of saving the environment.......I ask what is the cost to the environment of all these parts that have to be replaced and the short lifespan of these products.
sorry..don't get me started.
cheers
AnswerID:
474965
Reply By: toffytrailertrash - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 16:02
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 16:02
You should have had a look at a new Discovery 4 It would have solved all your problems and given you better fuel economy towing the Lotus
AnswerID:
474966
Follow Up By: toffytrailertrash - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 16:08
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 16:08
I should have posted further to qualify my response . I have had them all, Cruisers/Patrols/Pajeros and I am currently on a HSE Disco 4 apart from the issue with the 19" wheels this would have to be the best I have driven and with a Kedron on the way After all the reports towing big weights with the Disco I am very glad with the decision.
FollowupID:
749950
Follow Up By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 20:29
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 20:29
We purchased a new Rangie in 1983, it towed our boat with ease.
We kept it for 6 years, the only problem we had was when the Viscous Radiator Fan exploded and destroyed the bonnet /radiator and front grill.
We put up with the oil leaks which was common with them at the time.
We ended up trading it in on a 1990 Toyota Landcruiser. Oh what a feeling.
FollowupID:
749975
Reply By: Member - Terry D (Brisbane QLD - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 21:11
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 21:11
Dazza
A little question if you don't mind, what consumption do you get, around town, on the highway - without load and with load (van)?
I have a 200 series TTD and am not happy, oil consumption and 3 injectors thus far. Toyota more or less admit the early series injectors are faulty but won't replace them until each one goes (one at a time and potentially huge $$ implications and very inconvenient when your on a trip). Ever heard of the "limp
home mode"?
well after the last injector went it went into "limp
home mode"a number of the warning lights start up, you can;t get traction control and 4WD can't be engaged - imagine being up the top end of Fraser Island with no 4WD??Their warranty service is cra$, no loyalty. I have Toyota do all my
services, including an in between 5,000 k service, but doesn't mean squat. This is aside from the ongoing oil usage. Besides the new XF Falcon I purchased many years ago, this is the worst vehicle I ever purchased/
Oh what a feeling
T
.
AnswerID:
475018
Reply By: Retired & Lovin It - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 22:37
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 22:37
Feel for you Tim,
We have blown 2 engines in the same GU 3.0td (2004 STL Auto) 1st @ 42,000km
2nd @ 144,000 km. 1st one replaced under warranty, second my shout.
both happened towing 2500kg van, blow-up happens just after climbing steep hills and when you are coasting down the other side with no throttle. heaps heartache.
We are looking at getting a new ford
ranger dual cab with 3.2 td 5 cylinder hoping that will do the job better. plus we can carry a bit of gear in
the tub at the back.
all the best Don
AnswerID:
475034
Follow Up By: Leroy - Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:54
Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:54
I would like to get a new
Ranger to replace my 3.0l patrol as
well but seeing as it will have a new motor I better get a few km's on that first.
Leroy
FollowupID:
750023
Reply By: Nutta - Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 22:50
Sunday, Jan 15, 2012 at 22:50
I thought the grenade was the blowing of the motor not a cracked head?
Seems the title is incorrect.
Cheers
AnswerID:
475035
Follow Up By: fisho64 - Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 01:08
Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 01:08
"Grenade" is the vehicle, not the breakdown.
i.e its a noun not a verb.
FollowupID:
750003
Follow Up By: Nutta - Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 07:48
Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 07:48
So all patrols are grenades?
FollowupID:
750006
Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:12
Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:12
"Piston broke" and "pi$$ed and broke" are used to describe the motor and the owner respectively...
FollowupID:
750021
Follow Up By: Leroy - Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:55
Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:55
The 3.0l either cracks it head, pistons or both.
Leroy
FollowupID:
750024
Follow Up By: Retired & Lovin It - Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:34
Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:34
I am going to raise the issue of the Nissan failing engines with my Therapists, I am sure that is why I am going around the bend and triggers nightmares and domestic wars.
anyhow I keep singing:
Nil desperandum carburundum illegitami
FollowupID:
750027
Reply By: Leroy - Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:57
Monday, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:57
I always say to people, it's not a case oof if but when, regardless of how well you service your 3.0l. I changed oil and filters every 5k kms but obviously didnt' make any difference. When I get it back later int he week, 10k
services and I'll drive it like I stole it!
Leroy
AnswerID:
475073
Reply By: River Swaggie - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:01
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:01
I dont understand why you would want to tow (and theres a few) using a 3.0l even if it is turbo'd.....
I think it puts to much pressure on these engines...
AnswerID:
475177