Wednesday, Feb 08, 2012 at 21:01
Ahaaa .... the plot thickens!!
I hadn't realised that the Anderson Plug you referred to was actually the one used to connect to the vehicle while travelling to provide some charge from the engine.
This plug is in fact connected directly to the battery. In order to connect a panel to that point it would be necessary to have a controller between there and the mobile panel (i.e, probably on the panel itself.) I think this is probably what your installer is suggesting.
An alternative, which I would favour, is to use a single controller mounted close to the battery to handle both panels, with a direct line from the fixed panel to the input of this controller, and a SECOND Anderson plug allowing the mobile panel to plug into that line running from the fixed panel to the input of the controller.
IF however the controller must be mounted on (or close to) the fixed panel, it may not be possible for the 2 panels to share it. In this case, there may be a case for a second controller at the mobile panel, which could then feed into the anderson plug that's normally copnnected to the vehicle.
re The "good quality" regulator ( controller) proposed - while I'm in favor of good quality gear, the question of MPPT type or other type isn't really a matter of quality. It is a matter of their operating principle. An MPPT controller allows the panel to operate at its optimum, and the battery to be optimally charged. Unfortunately the two optima don't coincide so this type of controller does voltage conversion to match them up.
Hope that makes sense
Cheers
John | J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
752496