Wednesday, Feb 15, 2012 at 20:52
I am in no way saying
the SPOT is a bad thing, but what I am saying is I have a GPS enabled PLB that was bought
well before SPOT was a household name among travellers here in Australia.
To me a SPOT is a bit of a toy compared to the PLB and no matter what anyone says a PLB will always out do a SPOT due to the simple fact a PLB is monitored hear in Australia and the people who monitor it are the ones who respond.... with a SPOT you are still going through a second proprietary company before SARS in Australia are notified.
The more complex something becomes the more chance there is of something failing.... this could be a delay, inaccurate information or system failure.
You can not beat local knowledge.
I'm sure SPOT will work great and SPOT is a very
well organised organisation but I don't want to be the one who finds out if it works or not.
A quality PLB is made to a higher standard with longer battery shelf life then a SPOT hence the price difference.
BTW I think you will find SPOT doesn't meet the requirement for off shore boating as it has no strobe light, is not water activated and will not float the right way up.
I look at it this way.... a SPOT is like have handy a packet of bandaids if you cut your self bad... a quality PLB is like have proper gauze bandages.... both will work but ones better then the other.
If SPOT was available when I bought my PLB I still would of bought the PLB.
The last thing I want to do is use my SPOT for 4 days logging my travels then have to use it for an emergency only to find the batteries have gone flat.... and if it was a life threatening emergency the last thing I would want to do is fumble around and try to find the spare batteries, insert them, turn
the SPOT on and wait until it picks up a satellite.... The PLB I know the batteries are OK and it's simple to activate.
Now the good thing SPOT has done..... made it affordable to the masses who didn't want to spend the money or think they needed a PLB.
FollowupID:
753229