Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 00:38
Warren
There has been no end of discussions on the net about air bags and bent chassis. Last week I found an article on their use in motor homes in a magazine in a barber's
shop. It was written by former General Motors vehicle dynamics research engineer Collyn Rivers. It goes a long way towards explaining why they cause so much trouble.
They are an exponential spring. That means they can get very hard when compressed a long way. That often happens with heavy weights behind the vehicle's rear axle and in front of the trailer/van axles. A steel spring is lineal and has a "rate" which is a measure of how much weight is required to compress it 1 inch. A 200 lb spring for example compresses 1 inch with 200 lbs on it, 2 inches with 400 lbs, 3 inches with 600 and so on. As you add weight to your ute, the spring just keeps bending at its designed rate until it reaches the rubber bump stop. The rubbers are progressive rate springs which is why they are always tapered or hollow etc. They keep absorbing the weight in a progressive manner if you keep adding more. You now have the chassis sitting on six load bearing points and anyone who puts any more onto it after that deserves whatever happens.
The air bag just gets harder and is probably a bit like slamming the chassis down onto a block of wood if the wheels drop down into a deep depression or wash away in the road. This is when most chassis seem bend.
The springs can't help much because the air bag has lifted a lot of the weight off them. The bump rubber is not there any more to assist. It has also created a new single load bearing point in a section of the chassis not designed for it.
The following extract is a
forum reply from Collyn to an air bag question. The whole discussion is in the first link below.
The other three are also from Collyn and are on van loading and stability. You may find the answer to your problem there.
You have a lot of weight on your tow ball and it must be getting close to maximum for that particular car. Most manufacturers advertise the maximum weight a car can tow in good highway conditions. They usually recommend reducing it in off road conditions so that is something you could
check on.
In some of those links Collyn refers to the difference between weight and mass. The weight on your tow ball is static. Mass comes into it when the car is bouncing over rough surfaces or the van is swaying or pitching. The forces generated far exceed the static weight on the tow ball.
Enter the words dual cab chassis bending or a similar combination of those words into Google and you will soon find a lot of discussion and photos on the subject.
=======================================================================
by Collyn Rivers » Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:49 pm
There appears to be any amount of confusion re the use of air bags.
They are really a substitute for other forms of springing, or a way of changing ride characterists (such for example, to adjustably soften the ride of an unladen 4WD or other ute - but they are not for fixing sagging
suspension nor to increase ride height, nor to enable you to carry more weight.
Be aware that fitting them at one or other end only will alter vehicle handling.
Also be aware that their weight/deflection characteristic is exponential - whereas that of a coil spring is linear. This totally changes how the vehicle rides - and may cause very heavy impact loads if used close to their maximum travel.
They do not remotely, any more or less than any other form of
suspension, substitute for a WDH. That is a lever, and air bag is a spring.
I am currently working on an article re this for trailer users. I already have one in the CMCA The Wanderer (this month), but mainly re motorhomes, that I shall place on my own website shortly.
Collyn
Author/publisher of books and articles in RV and solar areas.
Collyn Rivers
Posts: 1796
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:01 pm
Location:
Broome WA
Website
http://caravanersforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=214130&sid=eaeec33bd38ef004c414bc731d1aed59#p214130http://www.aroundoz.com/a_clinic_archive/towing_couplings_levellers/towing_collyn_rivers.htmhttp://www.caravanandmotorhomebooks.com/pdf/vehicle_dynamics_complete.pdfhttp://www.noboundaries.com.au/Safety/caravan_stability.htm
AnswerID:
479593
Follow Up By: Warren B - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 19:08
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 19:08
sorry mate not real good at explaining myself. we ordered the van for our 80 series then sold that and bought the D-max more than happy with max. the axles on the van are back a bit to far for my liking but it tracks and handles very
well. the 260kg tow ball weight is 10% of van weight I spent some time on the weigh
bridge measuring and weighing.
I have a easy lift 600 WDH that I put on link 4, link 3 would probably be better but it seems to be a lot of force applied.
what this van does that no other trailer / van / boat that I have towed does is JAR it is constantly jarring and kicking us in the back ( sorry old truckie talk ) so my question is has anybody else had the problem ? how did they solve it ? not interested in using air bags to level the load but soften the jar effect.
I have seen what happens when you mix air bags, triton utes, and desert together and have already altered and going to alter loading, but just putting out feelers and getting ideas re D-max
Cheers Warren
FollowupID:
755112
Follow Up By: Member - Boo Boo (NSW) - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 20:25
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 20:25
Warren
I'm not an expert in this area, but it sounds like there is a fair bit of play in the tow ball area or where the tongue goes into the bar.
The only reason I mention that is I have had the same experience and found there was a haymen reece tongue in a different brand towbar and there was a lot of 'slop'.
I hope you find the problem very soon. Its not a good feeling to be shunted by the van.
FollowupID:
755121
Follow Up By: Warren B - Wednesday, Mar 07, 2012 at 18:12
Wednesday, Mar 07, 2012 at 18:12
Tongue into the bar is tight and screwed tight. no slop unlike my off road camper. thanks anyway mate i'll just keep asking and looking.
Cheers Warren
FollowupID:
755202