Bigger Tyres
Submitted: Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 14:07
ThreadID:
92339
Views:
3889
Replies:
8
FollowUps:
0
This Thread has been Archived
Been-Everywhereman
I have a 105series Standard Landcruiser 2006.
4.2litre Diesel Manual.
I am interested to hear peoples first hand experiences with the following questions.
Has anyone upsized their tyres to 285x75x16 and noticed any real life power loss/increased fuel etc.... and if so please explain/give results.....
I have no turbo on the vehicle and will not be puting one on either.
At this stage, yes it is gutless, but i am at peace with that.
I want to flick the 235x85x16 tyres i am running at the moment.
Fuel economy at this stage is a pretty consistant 14litres per 100.
Also has anyone out there fitted 315x70x16 with all my above questions again.
Reply By: Member - Peter S (NSW) - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 16:08
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 16:08
Hi, we have a 2003 V8 GXL fitted with BFG AT 285/75/16 had these over 5 years now, no probs at all, does use a little more fuel but have not noticed any loss of power, the speedo is out about 5klm but have fitted a scangauge and that shows correct speed also on GPS, would get these tyres again, happy with them, hope this helps, oh, normal driving use between 14 to 16 LPH. Pete
AnswerID:
479630
Reply By: Rockape - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 20:40
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2012 at 20:40
Mate,
If you bang those tyres on a naturally aspirated 1HZ that is already carting around to much weight for that engine. It will turn the vehicle into a dog and your fuel consumption will go up accordingly.
Explanation is the engine didn't put out enough torque or power when they increased the weight of the 105 series. You immediately increase fuel due to the extra rolling resistance of the 285 tyres and you change the gearing with the 285 tyres.
I can get away with my 285's due to having a chev diesel in the cruiser. I like the bigger rolling diameter because I tow in 4th gear and that gives the old girl a little more speed when I run her at the sweet spot in the rev range.
My consumption is just over 12l/h and fully loaded for a trip is now below 14l/h, fully loaded and towing 17l/h and that is before I put in new injectors.
RA.
AnswerID:
479671
Reply By: brownie - Wednesday, Mar 07, 2012 at 21:19
Wednesday, Mar 07, 2012 at 21:19
Mate, I've got a 2002 hzj105, It runs
well on the 235/85s -they are about the same height as the original 7.50 x 16s, but a bit wider and tubeless as
well.
Speedo is still accurate, I get about the same fuel consumption as you.
The hzj 105 is what it is, a good reliable & comfortable, if slowish vehicle.
Not sure what you hope to gain by fitting huge tyres, they may work ok with a turbo, but you don't have/want one of those.
Experiment a bit with the tyre pressures of your current tyres - might change the way yoiu feel about them. I run 40 front & 45 rear with a fairly heavy wagon(LR tank, tyre carrier, etc) When on sand drop them a bit, when towing put them up a bit. Works for me.
Cheers, brownie
AnswerID:
479812
Reply By: Crackles - Wednesday, Mar 07, 2012 at 21:48
Wednesday, Mar 07, 2012 at 21:48
Had a 105 diesel manual RV for 10 years with 285's on it & while yes it was slow, the funny thing is I pulled into
camp at the same time as everyone else in the group ;-) On the road it moved along
well even towing a trailer but it did die quickly in the hills requiring changing down earlier & revving out harder. If you don't mind dropping back to 80 or 90 kph in the hills then it's fine.
In the bush because you're using the lower gears, the bigger tyres are not really noticeable except of course the increased diameter is a real advantage in ruts, sand &
rock driving.
Fuel consumption increased slightly up to 15L per 100 & a bit more when pushing hard. I was more than happy with the improved offroad ability V's the loss of road speed & consumption.
Cheers Craig..............
AnswerID:
479819