Prado Pajero
Submitted: Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 19:11
ThreadID:
92666
Views:
4437
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
11
This Thread has been Archived
Member DZ
Looking at buying a prado or pajero diesel 2009 model on. Prefer an auto and tend to use our 4x4, have done CSR, simpson, etc. Have had Troopies and I realise that these cars are not in the class of a troopy, but we a getting a little older and looking for a bit more comfort. Any feed back from owners regarding ability off road, reliability if maintained to log book, fuel consumption if towing 1.5 t camper. Any experience with auto box problems? Thanks in advance. dennis
Reply By: Steve M1 (NSW) - Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 19:29
Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 19:29
gee Den, this'll get em excited ;-))
Can't quite help as I opted for the last of the 120 Prados because it suited me more than the 150. Have certainly heard good things about the Paj though - mainly extra power but the prado will comfortably do you and for reliability, pretty hard to beat. Also, try Pradopoint website. Everything you need to know on there.
Good luck. Can't go wrong from what I've gathered.
AnswerID:
480924
Follow Up By: Steve M1 (NSW) - Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 20:00
Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 20:00
Not directly relavent but an interesting thread: no. 87773
FollowupID:
756324
Reply By: Member - WillyWish (WA) - Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 20:17
Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 20:17
Hey Dennis
I had a 2008 Pajero NS Auto diesel and just swapped over to a Prado 150 Series GXL diesel.
The Paj is a great tourer without doubt. Only ever had 1 issue with it and that was the DPF warning and going into limp mode as a result. As this was a day after a service I suspect the wrong engine oil was used. The Paj is a very capable mid range off-roader and super for towing as many will note. I never tracked fuel consumption per se, however I'd think it is pretty good hence why so many people choose it as a tow vehicle.
I've only done 5,000km on the Prado so far and not alot of towing. I love the ride of the Prado, but I admit I am riding on aftermarket
suspension and airbags and beautiful Coopers rubber. Power is a little disappointing, I'd probably say that the Prado is a little underpowered, I'll probably chip it to fix that issue. The build quality is good, no issues so far. Fuel consumption seems as good, if not better than the NS pajero. Love the standard 150 litre capacity. The prado also looks a nicer 4b (to me anyway). Love the range of aftermarket accessories.
All in all, two pretty similar vehicles. Prado more $ but also better resale.
Good luck.
Will.
AnswerID:
480927
Follow Up By: NTVRX - Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 17:59
Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 17:59
The original post was "I am considering a 2009...." No mention of the 2008. Out of interest I have a 2009 NTVRX auto Diesel & it is fantastic. The best touring vehicle I have ever owned. I tow a full van 19'6" Paramount and sit on the posted speed limit without a problem,heaps of torque,sits on the road beautifully,good brakes & I can drive it in straight auto (Yes, in overdrive) or I can move the selector over to manual & drive it like a manual. A very easy comfortable vehicle to drive & the 5yr & 10 year warranties relieves the mental pressure of "What if"!!! I get 7.9 to 8.3 sitting on 100K/pH towing the van & 10 to 11 K/pL w/out the van. The only hiccup is the opening rear door...with some hitches it can be a pain but with a spare wheel lift (Most dealers will do this for you for free) and changing the coupling from on top of the A frame to underneath I can open my rear door fully. There is no comparision between a Troopy & a NT Pajero....completely different vehicles....that would be like comparing a Kenworth to a UD!!!!
FollowupID:
756409
Follow Up By: Steve M1 (NSW) - Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 18:01
Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 18:01
oi Willy - underpowered???? You wanna try moving from a Defender (Fred Flintstone model) to a Prado. I thought I was driving a bloody Ferrari - LOL. Actually, I chipped it with a Steinbauer and put decent suspension/shocks on, as most Toyotas are a bit crap in that regard. Always liked the Pajero's on road manners but was swayed by less clearance and Prado's reliability track record. - There you go: look what you made me say - that's put the mockers on it.
btw, the 120 has the same 180L capacity as the Troopy, a bigger aperture (opening to you) at the back door and easier 2nd battery install.
FollowupID:
756411
Reply By: andoland - Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 20:33
Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 20:33
I can't comment on the Pajero because I've never had one, but I do have a 150 series Prado. Last year we did a 10,500km trip from central Qld across to WA, up the CSR, down the Tanami, Binns Track, etc, back
home and it did not miss a beat.
Mine is manual not auto and we were packed to the hilt (wife and 2 kids) but not towing. We averaged under 13l/100km for the entire trip and under 14 l/100km for the length of the CSR.
AnswerID:
480930
Reply By: Dazmit - Thursday, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:09
Thursday, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:09
I was looking between 120 Prado and Pajero a few months ago.
What put me off the 120 Prado was the injector issue (pages and pages on Prado point) and that once out of the 3 year warranty Toyota don't want to know you.
Pajero - the 2009 NT model is heapa quieter than the earlier NS and more powerful if you get the MY10 (late 2009) onwards than Mitsu deleted the DPF so no issues with that.
You can pick up a newer Pajero ie late 2009 / 2010 still under it's 5 year warranty for less $$$ , lower mileage and more features than a 2008 120 Prado which is out of warranty and may require injector replacement at your cost.
Cheers
Darryl
AnswerID:
481080