Thursday, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:56
If this post was titled "landcruiser 200 vs Landrover Discovery D4" I would say you comments are warranted BUT it's about Landcruiser 100 series vs 200 series.
Maybe we can also include the BMW X5 and the Merc AMG G Wagon..... and the Audi Q7..... LOL
Yes had a good look at a D4 and they are a great 4x4 just like the Jeep Grand Cherokee Overlander.
We are looking at the Jeep Grand Cherokee Overlander not to replace the 200 series but as a good allround town car.
The down side of the D4 and Jeep is the lack of the dealer network in areas outside the main capitals.
The D4 we were looking at came with 19 inch rims making it next to useless again once outside the main capitals....... the lower spec D4 you could go down to 17 inch rims, our Landcruiser can standard on 18 inch rims and for $100 a rim we went to Gen Toyota Steelies in 17x8.5.
The next thing was the lack of available GVM upgrades for the D4 (non existent) whereby with the 200 we went 500Kg over standard factory GVM.
Next on the list was availability of spare parts and I don't mean belts and filters, out of all the countries who manufacture vehicles that come through our workshop the the hardest and in most cases most expensive to order parts for are European vehicles.
And another thing was the size of aftermarket fuel tanks, with the Landcruiser we can carry an extra 100Lts over a D4 with long range tanks and in the outback when remote travelling this makes a hugh difference.
With the room side of things it comes down to usable room and not just volume, our 200 series has been converted to a two seater.
Maybe we should get back on topic about 100 vs 200.
FollowupID:
759480