Thursday, Aug 09, 2012 at 17:43
Dennis.... it's not about it being an English lesson, in law there is a big difference between "will" and "may".
As I said Dennis most manufacturers will use the word "may" to lower the chance of liability.
Smoking cigarettes "may" cause cancer..... if government used the word "will" I'm sure there would be a legal challenge to force the government to prove they do on every case.
If you drink alcohol it may cause liver damage.... it's a know fact, if your exposed to sun it may cause skin cancer.... if you don't have sun light you may lack vitamin D.... yet we all seem to still do most of them.
"May" is a word the can be used to describe an instance the could or could not happen.
The sad thing is there are so many specialists who still blame something for the cause with no real evidence to back there claims.
There are businesses out there who specialise in forensic reporting of mechanical failures.
We use them on certain failure to work what had caused something to fail..... these
places employ engineers and comprehensive
test equipment.
We have had reports come back up to 20 pages long with photo's taken using an electron microscope showing structure deforms.....
Without knowing what the contamination was in the first place it would be hard to pin point the exact cause.
And as for dirt getting through the filter.... if it did then there are ground to seek compensation from Toyota for designing a filtering system that was not capable of filtering that was out side of your sons control or knowledge.
But without the data to back it up your pushing ...... up a
hill.
With any filter there could be a very very remote chance of bigger particles getting through as the standard is based on X microns at parts per million.
FollowupID:
768282