Yokahama Geolander a/t-s reviews and tyre size questions
Submitted: Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 21:47
ThreadID:
98536
Views:
3030
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
8
This Thread has been Archived
mick78
Hello,
My 2006 HDJ100 l have just bought has Geolander A/T-s tyres fitted. They are 275/65/17. What are these tyres like off road? On road they are great. I am a little concerned about the performance off road. I have looked on the net and found they are a two ply side wall and a load rating of 1215kg and speed of 210kph.
I have had BFG Muddys on all my cars. They area a three ply side wall and load of 1450 and speed og 160kph in a 285/70/17 size.
Has anyone found the 20mm of hight in a 100 series a real big advatage? My driving these days is more touring. But, my fear is in the High Country or desert plains when the rain sets in, how will the Geolanders stand up to this?
I have thought of BFG muds on steel rims. So no concern of damage to alloys when off road.
Anyone with any
information would be great. Thank you.
Reply By: Member - Tony (ACT) - Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 06:36
Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 06:36
I have used them for years on the Patrol till the KM 2s went on last year.
Of all the trips I done, including Cape, CSR, High Country and the bits in between, never had a problem with the Geolanders. In 10 years have two puntures and both thoes were close to
home, a tec screw in one and a rivit in the other. The last set are now on the camper and still going strong.
The size was 265.75.16. Presure plays a big part on how they preform, never went above 38psi and never below 16.
One of the best all round tyres I have ever used in the last 36 years of owning 4WDs.
AnswerID:
496698
Follow Up By: mick78 - Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:19
Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:19
Hello Tony, thanks for your reply. You have seen a lot with the geolanders. How did you find them in the muddy sections on the cape? Have you gone up a size with the KM2 tyres?
FollowupID:
772413
Follow Up By: Member - Tony (ACT) - Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 17:53
Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 17:53
The Cape was ok, a lot of wheel spin on the steep exits, a Mud tyre may have prevented that. Went into
Maytown via the coach road and was fine.
No I stayed with the same size tyre when changing over to the KM2s'. I rather like standard width, less chance I think of sidewall damage compared to wider ones.
FollowupID:
772443
Reply By: olcoolone - Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 08:16
Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 08:16
My first question is why do you want an aggressive tyre like the KM2 that are a mud tyre when your driving is more touring orientated.....
It's a no brainer, do you buy a tyre for the 5% chance you may need that type of tyre and have a disadvantage for the other 95% of your driving.
Forget about tyre strength and sidewalls.... a mud tyre is one of the most
puncture prone tyre out there, the big gaps between the lugs that make up 50% of the tread surface area is not very thick and in most cases only 1/2 a thick as a A/T.
The only advantage of a mud tyre is more grip in real rocky slow stuff and mud plus to some the biggest draw card is they look tough!.... the down side is you pay a premium, you get less mileage, your fuel consumption increasers, you get poor handling and in rocky stuff you tear off lugs.... as for
puncture resistance I would say less than an A/T.
As for grip again do you buy for the 5% or the 95%?
Alloy rims are stronger than steel and the last and only time I have damaged a rim was when we ran over a star dropped sitting 5 inches out of the ground on a freshly graded road (remains of a
old fence line).
We have Mickey Thompsom MTZ's on our 200 series and hate them with a passion, may look at Cooper ST Maxx or another slightly more aggressive A/T
Do you have a winch?
AnswerID:
496704
Follow Up By: mick78 - Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:43
Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:43
G'Day, the answer to your first question is l have always had bfg mud. Never had a drama in any if my trips for the last 15 years. Always adjusted tyre pressure to suit. I just do not have the faith in the a/t.
As for mud tyre strength. In my touring trips and live 2 hrs from the high country. Never had a flat. A mate on the Simpson trip had two flats ion hos cooper a/t. Another on Bridgestone a/t.
I have had trips where over night the weather cam turn and the tracks become like soup. I have a winch. Never had to use it. Maybe it's cause I have had bfg MUDs?
I always adjust tyre pressure to suit. Inherent can you hock up the winch in a bog in
the desert?
I understand your 95% and 5%. I have a work car and the 100 series is used for trips only. So a mud is no problem. As its not used around town. It has not been a looks thing for me.
I guess it's more I have little faith in the a/t. Just putting the feelers out to see how other people go with the geolanders. I am willing to try or say wear ten out as the new car has them on.
I have always had 33 inch tyres. Just wondering how many people do it with 275/65/7 on there cars.
Thank you
FollowupID:
772415
Follow Up By: olcoolone - Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 13:07
Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 13:07
I understand your concerns.....we have done remote trips with people (groups up to 15 vehicles) where there has be a mixture of all tyre types and there has never been a concern for one type of tyre getting more punctures....... most come down to driver error and being unlucky.
As for A/T tyres not performing very good in mud..... again a bit of a question mark, A/T tyres work OK in mud but deep sticky mud then no..... we have had M/T tyres struggle in clay where the only way was to winch 300m.
After reading your posts it seems you have already made your mind up that BFG KM2 M/T tyres are the way to go and as for size.... get the biggest you can as you will not be happy with any other size.
BTW.... make sure the white lettering is on the outside.
FollowupID:
772423