Thursday, Mar 25, 2004 at 00:08
Hi Wayne,
thanks for that info. I concur with most of what you say, with a couple of deviations regarding the inner workings of the pump mount and sender units.
I believe the original OE pump and mounting bracket was used, and it sat on the bottom of the tank, inside a swell pot as you called it. The pump assembly is mounted in the rear right corner and it is fitted into a 70mm lowered area on that corner .THere was no extension to the mounting arm, and the low fuel warning light was not on the pump assembly. I replaced the pump with a Goss unit when in
Nhulunbuy, $230.00(due to the price of OE spares, $850.00,I think, which included the whole mounting bracket!!). I never removed the sender unit, but I assume the low fuel sensor was on it. As you suggest, my fuel gauge didnt move for the first 250 K's, and when the car was stationary and I was draining the tank, it had 5 litres left in it when the light came on.
There is a 300mm wide by 360 mm long by about 40mm high addition on top of the tank in the area of the filler pipe
junction, and there is an air line that goes from there to the polution control circular thing on the passangers side of the engine bay. The filler pipe comes in above the chassis rail and meets the tank at the top of the main side body, running into the top side weld, and the filler breather pipe is welded in at the same spot, so there should be no problem with an air lock developing in that area,There is also an extension from the top of the tank which extends out over the prop shaft, but I've not bothered with measuring it tonight
The Brown Davis badge is marked as 02 98 B5 (i think, difficult to make out the last letter )
THe reason the front mount cracked was because where it was welded to the double skin , it was only done on the top and the two sides,leaving the bottom open and so it began cracking across thedouble skin from the lower end of each side weld, No problem since it was done properly.
As you say, the police would not put up with anything dodgy, so it was puzzlying as to why the owner of BD should go into this big defensive rap with the accusations he was making.And it was the owner of the company I was talking to, cant remember his name, but that was a question I put to him.
Did you ever
test the capacity of the tanks you were fitting? Basically we believe what we are told!
THe extra fuel and the winch made it a good buy and the vehicle performed very
well for us considering where we went and the load we carried. Only other problem that developed of any consequence was we bent the rear chassis, and where it bent there are two holes in the inner wall which are used to hold cable clamps. The holes are on both rails of the chassis and it bent in the same place on both sides, about 8-10 inches ahead of the bump stop. I see the factory has added a gussett to that area on later vehicles of that generation model.
I wonder if you might have fitted my vehicle??
Cheers Wayne, thanks for the input
Sails
AnswerID:
51878
Follow Up By: Wayne (NSW) - Thursday, Mar 25, 2004 at 00:35
Thursday, Mar 25, 2004 at 00:35
Sails,
I wish I had not killed of so many brain cells back in the 70s. On the latter tanks they did recess the pump location. The 300mmx360mm part you are talking about is the expansion chamber. That is where all the fumes go on a hot day. The pipe from there goes to the carbon cannester where the fumes get filtered before excaping to the air.
The numbers02 98 B5. Made in Feburary 1998 by a welder who name started with B. We never checked the amount of fuel that went in the tanks, didn't have time, when the Rodoes arrived from the dealer we only had a limited time for the turn around. A vehicle like yours, by myself, would set up two in a day. The tank alone took 50 min start to finish. I would have to have a look at it to confirm if it was one of
mine.
Wayne
FollowupID:
313641