Tuesday, May 21, 2002 at 00:00
A lot of people seem to give trailers a bad name. Here are some thoughts that I have which change the focus onto those vehicles without a
trailer.
Lets take my example when I travel (with wife and two kids) with a camper trailer. I have a maximum of 1000 kgs in weight on the trailer.
This includes various spares for the trailer and the second spare tyre.
In the vehicle all I have is the people, the fridge, and the recovery gear.
Given the weight of the car (100 series land cruiser) in base is 2245 kgs before the bar work, with people on board and a full fuel load
(in long range fuel tank) and the above gear, the vehicle would weigh around 2900 kgs to 3000 kgs.
Therefore with this weight pattern and a
well balanced trailer, the average weight distribution is say 750 kgs on the vehicle and 500 on the trailer.
Now if I load up the vehicle and leave the trailer behind, I get a few problems. Firstly with a gross vehicle mass (GVM) of 3180 kgs, I only have
180 kgs to play with. Take out of that the water and the second spare tyre I am left with less than 50 kgs to cover food, bedding, clothes
cooking gear, second spare tyre etc.
That leaves me with a little problem. I have two choices, leave stuff behind that may endanger my family or overload the vehicle.
If I travel on maximum GVM of 3180 my average weight distribution is 795 kgs, which is an increase over the example with the trailer.
If I overload the vehicle, not only am I putting more stress on the vehicle when it is already under stress from the terrain it is covering,
but my average weight distribution is higher again.
Therefore my view is that travelling with a
well built off road trailer with appropriate tyre pressures will place less stress on the road than
travelling with a fully or over loaded vehicle.
This is the bit of the "debate" that I believe people forget. So there was my two cents worth over to anyone else for further comments
AnswerID:
3729
Follow Up By: Bob - Tuesday, May 21, 2002 at 00:00
Tuesday, May 21, 2002 at 00:00
Wayne
thankyou for injecting some intelligence into the debate. Yes I feel that there is a lot of mindless criticism of trailers from inexperienced know-it-alls who love to bandy the 'environmentally insensitive' label without the least understanding of how a trailer could harm the environment. The proposition that someone would abandon several thousand dollars worth of trailer in the desert like a empty beer can seems crazy to me.
I've travelled with overladen roof racks, I've travelled with the back seats removed and the cabin overloaded, and I've travelled with the trailer. From a fuel economy point of view the over loaded cabin is best, but from a safety and comfort angle the trailer wins hands down. Assuming that I don't leave several grands worth of kit in the desert, I would like to know how the trailer is more environmentally harmful than the overloaded vehicle.
FollowupID:
1565
Follow Up By: Johnsy - Tuesday, May 21, 2002 at 00:00
Tuesday, May 21, 2002 at 00:00
now some sense is beginning to surface and
well informed fact .As for putting on a roof rack and burning more fuel because of increased wind resistance or trying to jam all required equipment behind a cargo barrier which transfers weight to the rearaxle and change the steering no thanks.A casual observation quite a few interstate vehicles obviously on tour have locally regoed trailers (
Alice Springs).As for my trailer it,s an all steel number leaf sprung and I put a full length chassis from tow ball to rear now done 40000 dirt ks .Trailers for this lad.
FollowupID:
1567