Friday, Jan 08, 2016 at 16:06
Quote "and remember ball weight is part of the payload of the tug."
The loading on your rear axle is worse than most people think. The loading on the rear axle of your tug is amplified by the lever action caused by the ball being so far behind the rear axle. The extreme case for me was the overhang on my Disco. The distance of the ball behind the rear axle was 60% of the wheel base. That meant that the 200 kg ball weight of the van actually imposed 360 kg of loading on the rear axle. Many vehicles, particularly twin cab utes, have an overhang of around 50% of the wheel base. That means that a ball weight of 200 kg will impose 300 kg loading on the rear axle.
Many
forum members sling off at the limits that Nissan place on their vehicles when vans are hitched up. The thing is that Nissan have worked out the de-rating needed when WDH is not used (because they recommend that it not be used on their tow bars.) If you are towing with other vehicles you need to work this out for yourself.
If you add the maximum weights for the two axles of a vehicle and compare that with the GVM of the vehicle you will find that the combined axle weights is very little more than the GVM. What this means is that you can load up the vehicle, including the tow ball weight and have the total weight of the tug not exceed the GVM but have the axle overloaded because of the way the loading is distributed by virtue of the loading remotely located behind the rear axle. Twin cab utes are designed to be loaded with passengers as
well as the loading in the tub/tray. Even without a van it is possible to overload the rear axle if you load it up to its GVM but do not have 5 substantial people in the cabin.
FollowupID:
863098