Thursday, Apr 04, 2019 at 18:22
I am not trying to argue but even in 74 who deemed it full ?
Do they do regular checks on it ?
Or was it simply covered by 5 - 6m of
water it’s not a swimming pool.
Sat image 2011
I just don’t like using the word full it simply has or has not
water in it.
I am pretty sure there was
water in south of the Lake in 2011 see attached sat. Image.
The rain and river levels in 74 have been seen since just not all at once.
No one will ever know what levels or on ground rain it took to get the Lake to that 74 level. BOM just doesn’t have the monitoring in place to even get a guess in and still don’t.
No one saw the Lake covered by
water in 2016 or after Yasi because it wasn’t by the
creek it was by on ground rain.
Some folk promote tourism
well and have been cut down for it when they have been right and the
creek did run and it did run to the Lake ,it’s just that others have more intentions for the
water and have to have it at a boating level before it’s any good. Very few people who come to visit out there go boating. They just come to enjoy the
water whether it’s 10m or 10cm. Seeing the
water on the Lake is a gamble as you say it can be there then not just from wind. Don’t gamble fly it’s the only way to see the Lake and then try for the
water at the access points.
FollowupID:
898326