Smart Alternator v Dumb
Submitted: Thursday, Jul 10, 2025 at 20:22
ThreadID: 150997
Views:1172
Replies:16
FollowUps:32
Member - Warrie (NSW)
I have upgraded from a 120 Series Prado to a 150 which has the Smart Alternator. The old one had the now not so smart alternator and via 6 m of cable with Anderson plug, was able to charge my 120Ah lead acid battery in the van. This worked fine for 7 years. I am getting conflicting reports about the ability of the 150 system to be able to put out enough volts to send current into the van. A
test showed 13.95 volts on van battery with the new car but 14.4 with the old. To me that is not too much of a drop but I could be mistaken. Besides, it is amps I want in to the battery and the new alternator regulates current or so I understand.
An auto sparky has given a $2000 plus quote to fit a BC DC 40 amp charger and new thicker wiring, breakers etc. Ouch! I can put solar into the van only when camped so no issue with regulating input from a solar and car supply. Advice welcomed. Cheers.... W
Reply By: qldcamper - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:25
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:25
To the best of my knowlege your alternator would not regulate current, that is controlled by voltage regulation and the laws of physics.
There will always be current flowing if the voltage at the front is higher than that of the battery at the back, just a matter of how much.
Text book voltages of 13.8 to 14.2 is acceptable to charge STD lead acid batteries so it depends on what sort of battery you have in the van, deep cycle batteries slightly higher voltages to push the ions (hydrogen) hard enough to get them to fully saturate the plates.
Just give it a try with a similar set up to what you had, it will get you most of the way there then top off with your solar.
If it isn't enough then add a bcdc unit, the cable size will remain the same.
If you have lithium in the van then the jury is still out on that one. General consensus is prolonged charging of fully charged cells can cause irreversible damage to the internal chemicals.
AnswerID:
648231
Reply By: qldcamper - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:36
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:36
A further note, get yourself a cheap dc clamp meter, then you will be able to easily see where and what is happening with your amps.
As for $2000 to install a 40 amp system.
For hald decent quality products and a safely and carefully installed system, that is pretty reasonable.
You could supply your own cheaper hardware releasing the sparky from warranty liability and you could save maybe 20%.
AnswerID:
648232
Follow Up By: Member - nick boab - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:34
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:34
Alternately qld , The op could a attach a couple of semi flexible solar panels from an unnamed company & a DIY installation for
well under $ 500 and be a lot more usable than the DC charger , would you think ??
160w solar panel
FollowupID:
929434
Follow Up By: qldcamper - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:42
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:42
Only if the sun is shining while driving Nick.
Dcdc chargers are needed for when the solar charging system has already failed usually from poor weather conditions.
Edit that, alternator charging systems, even if only 60% efficient are needed.
FollowupID:
929435
Follow Up By: Member - nick boab - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:10
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:10
Qld , totally agree with you there . I purchased a second hand Honda generator for the times when we are camped up at one location for this very reason .
FollowupID:
929437
Follow Up By: Peter_n_Margaret - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:40
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:40
The OKA is mostly electric and a tiny bit of gas (about 1kg/month on the road). HWS and heating is diesel.
99% of that electricity comes from fixed solar and 1% direct from the alternator on rare occasions.
We have not owned a generator for over 20 years.
The new build OKA will have over 2kW of solar, direct alternator charging for emergencies, no gas, induction cooking, diesel heating and HWS and everything else electric.
You cannot have too much solar.
Cheers,
Peter
OKA196 motorhome
FollowupID:
929439
Reply By: Rangiephil - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:48
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:48
The smart alternator in my 2018 Everest Trend charges 2 Lifepo4 batteries, one in my car and one in my caravan through 2 separate DC/DC chargers both rated at around 20 amps. The charge rate stays at say 14.2 volts until both batteries are full charged then reverts to 12.7volts unless braking or going downhill.
It all worked fine for 6000KM trip with van.
You do not need heavier cables as long as the ones now are adequate as a DC/DC charger draws less than a direct coupling when the hose/caravan battery is low. A DC/DC charger will charge the house battery as long as the alternator is producing some voltage even down to say 13 volts.
AnswerID:
648233
Reply By: qldcamper - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:05
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:05
Warrie, just a side note to help people understand things a bit better.
This is just an example so the voltages are not exact.
You have a 12 volt battery, if your alternator regulates at 14.4 volts the charging potential is 2.4 volts.
Now apply your 0.45 volt difference it is quite a high percentage.
AnswerID:
648236
Reply By: RMD - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:40
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:40
Warrie.
Seeing you have a reasonable sized cable to the rear battery, fit a larger than flow rated fuse or breaker, to the starting end, and a 25AMP DC DC unit, around $300, to near the van battery. Ensure it is wired to start when Ignition is ON and all will charge the aux battery. Not hard to do and unless you discharge the 120ah battery Lithium or not, very low, the DCDC will simply do it's work, If you cannot do that for under $500 I would be surprised. Remember, more than HALF of a Sparky cost is LABOUR, not goods.
The Vehicle alternator will SEE the load and provide sufficient charging rate for use by the DCDC, when the system is demanding it! Most DCDC of any worth can also accept solar input and provide GENUINE, MPPT action.
Don't buy TOO cheap in the DC DC realm or you might get a unit which claims MPPT but DOESN'T produce any. If under $200 cost for a DC DC they are VERY SUS.
Search the Net, a "MOBI" DCDC Mppt charger and anything which looks like the same case and package, AVOID THEM. They DO not perform MPPT on solar although claiming they DO.
AnswerID:
648238
Reply By: Peter_n_Margaret - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:08
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:08
My view on DC-DC chargers is a bit different from most.
The alternator provides a large source of charging energy at an ideal voltage for battery charging (including for Li batteries).
DC-DC chargers are excellent and effective devices to overcome voltage drop between the power source and the battery being charged, but if the distance is not great and/or the cable is not too long, the voltage drop will not be excessive and a DC-DC charger serves no purpose sufficient to justify its cost.
In 20 years I have had direct charging from the standard 85A alternator available for the house batteries in the OKA via a simple manually switched relay. Those batteries used to be AGMs and are now LiFePO4.
I also recently changed to a 30Ah LiFePO4 crank battery that weighs just 4.5kg. So far, so good. Great cranking.
Cheers,
Peter
OKA196 motorhome
AnswerID:
648240
Follow Up By: qldcamper - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:50
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:50
Curious to know what engine your 30ah battery is cranking?
I can't see anything wrong with your charging theory in later vehicles. When deep cycle la batteries first become available in automotive sizes the charging systems in warmer climate countries maxed out at 14.2v which was too low to properly maintain deep cycle batteries but over the last two and a half decades it has krept up to 14.7 because of that but the myth still carries on, but now with temp compensated systems that can drop to very low 13s.
VD over long runs doesn't help but the only difference it makes is the time required for the distant battery to charge, the voltage will still equalise as the current demand diminishes.
From what I have read lithium batteries will charge provided the voltage does not exceed a certain level which varies from brand to brand from 14.4 to 14.6 but it is continuing to charge small currents after the battery state of charge is at 100% will cause irreversible damage over time. Weather this is true or not, who knows, it is just the theory of at least one chemical engineer.
FollowupID:
929442
Follow Up By: Peter_n_Margaret - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 18:01
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 18:01
"Curious to know what engine your 30ah battery is cranking?"
4 cyl, 4 L turbo charged Perkins diesel.
The Li replaced a 125Ah standard AGM. I have been using AGMs for cranking for about 15 years because wet cell LAs fall apart on the corrugations.
The Li crank has so far survived 25,000km including the Canning, so I am optimistic.
Cheers,
Peter
OKA196 motorhome
FollowupID:
929455
Follow Up By: qldcamper - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 18:41
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 18:41
Yes corrugations are tough on batteries, I went to both start and acc batteries AGM but cooked them both prematurely under the bonnet, only lasted a couple of years so back to two flooded batteries under the bonnet.
Hopfully lithiums will hold up outside the engine bay but I think they will need passive cell balancing to cope with the constant charging. Time will tell.
FollowupID:
929456
Follow Up By: Member - LeighW - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 19:33
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 19:33
There's that many differing opions on floating Lithiums so it is a try it and see yourself scenario.
My 200Ah of lithiums draw virtually zero current when fully charged yet I have seen upto 3% of capacity draw when floating cited by different sources. I just cant see how they come up with 3% unless there is a problem with the cells, or the batteries they are referring to have a BMS with integrated cell balancers.
I have been floating
mine for 9 years now and no ill affects todate.
Both my solar charger and DCDC float charge Lithiums on the Lithium profile as do most if not all of the popular ones so float charging off the alternator is no different just the voltage may be a bit higher but then according to general information about there is no safe float voltage for Lithiums.
Interestingly the older version of my DCDC did stop charging the Lithium battery when the battery was fully charged, but it was a nuisance as the battery had to discharge to around 75% before the charger would enter charge mode again. I don't know of any charger that actually stops charging the Lithium once fully charged due to issue of deciding when to restart charging. It's not so bad if your measuring Ah in and out but most chargers don't do that and it gets a lot harder if your using voltage as the trigger point so it is easier to just go to a float charge.
FollowupID:
929457
Reply By: Member - LeighW - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 12:33
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 12:33
The 150 does not have a smart alternator it is a temperature controlled unit. Toyota semi implemented a smart charge setup in the 150 in that the alternator is contected to the engine ECU and the ECU can provide diagnostic information for the alternator but they did not implement smart charge functions.
They also lowered the charge rate of the alternator compared to the 150 model to help then comply with anti pollution requirements without the need to go to a full smart charge system.
The 14.4V you are getting with the 120 I would assume is with cold under bonnet conditions or a very cold ambient temperature, esle you have a booster diode fitted. The voltage will reduce as the under bonnet temperature rises.
The voltage of the 150 will get quite low once the under bonnet and ambient temperature rises so you
really have no option but to go with a DCDC in the van for charging off the car.
If you could charge the battery before using the existing cable with no DCDC I would have think you would be able to simply install a say a 25A DCDC without the need to change the cable as I doubt you would have had more than 25A if that flowing with the old setup.
AnswerID:
648242
Follow Up By: Member - Warrie (NSW) - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:03
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:03
Hi Leigh, I made an assumption re the 14.4 V on the 120 Series 2008 model. Just went and put meter on it at a cold start. It read 14.41 for a split second and then dropped to 13.80. Same with the second under bonnet battery, both being lead acid. So that is actually 0.15 V less than the 150 Series at a cold start. Tried it several times and same result, 14.4 volts at first contact then a drop to 13.8. A mystery to me.
FollowupID:
929447
Follow Up By: Member - LeighW - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:20
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:20
Does the 120 have a VSR and a second battery, if so then the load of the second battery charging
is probably pulling it down. Usually the 120 will sit around 14.2V - 14.4V no load for around
10 - 20 minutes with the ambinet around 20C then drop down.
FollowupID:
929448
Follow Up By: Member - Warrie (NSW) - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:37
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:37
Oddly enough I took it to Batt World yesterday to
test 2nd battery. It failed as I knew it would as it is 7 years old. Of course his readout said replace battery. It was wired thru a switch to an Engel socket in left rear wall but I had cut wires etc to hook it onto our Waeco which has since died. In 7 years the 2nd batt was active for about 4 months in 4 years and not at all for the last three. So I will not get one for the 150 as it has a 220V outlet to run our newer Waeco - still a 2008 model but 2nd hand. A
test of 10 mins for the fridge off the piddly 100W Toyota inverter - engine running - will have the purists rolling their eyes for being too short. I will go out now and disconnect 2nd batt and
check voltmeter. Fingers crossed.
FollowupID:
929449
Follow Up By: Member - LeighW - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:46
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:46
Something odd going on there, the charge rate of the 120 is higher than the 150. you need to disconnect any add on system and
check the voltage at the cranking battery.
FollowupID:
929451
Follow Up By: Member - Warrie (NSW) - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:51
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 14:51
Disconnected 2nd batt and no change to above readings. It is a REDARC VSR system which was in the car when purchased in 2018.
FollowupID:
929452
Follow Up By: Member - LeighW - Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 16:08
Friday, Jul 11, 2025 at 16:08
Just realised what I wrote above is wrong, should have been:
They also lowered the charge rate of the alternator compared to the 120.
Your 120 should be giving you a higher reading than your getting if it still has the OEM alternator and its working ok. The 14.1V your see when it first starts is ok, the 13.8 is on the low side for a cold engine bay.
The thing you need to look at is the voltage will drop when the engine bay warms up and when the load on the alternator gets high. You need to measure what voltage are you seeing across the cranking battery when the cars have been driven for around 40 minutes?
FollowupID:
929453