Triton ute improvements.
Submitted: Sunday, Oct 05, 2025 at 09:51
ThreadID:
151664
Views:
1702
Replies:
4
FollowUps:
5
This Thread has been Archived
axle
Mits have finally made some improvements with the rear over hang issue on their dual cab utes ,by the looks of it anyway . more chassis strength. and heavier shocks make it a bit more competitive in the crazy ute market , and of course you can still tow 3.5 t like the rest of them....lol.
Cheers Axle.
Reply By: RMD - Sunday, Oct 05, 2025 at 13:06
Sunday, Oct 05, 2025 at 13:06
Axle
Does that mean their chassis are now nearing as strong as other ute deigns and the
WHEELS are in a more favourable position & they have actually fitted some shocks which work? I see a lot of them near me and marvel at the amount of tray/tub up and down oscillations, even on town roads!
AnswerID:
648572
Follow Up By: axle - Sunday, Oct 05, 2025 at 14:01
Sunday, Oct 05, 2025 at 14:01
G/Day RMD
I Guess So, Although i have had a few mitsubishi utes over the years very light, but have had very little trouble with any of them . Over loading in the wrong areas has been the biggest problem some have had
a problem shared with a few others makes as
well if you look into it.
Cheers Axle
FollowupID:
929994
Reply By: Member - Bigfish - Monday, Oct 06, 2025 at 15:21
Monday, Oct 06, 2025 at 15:21
Yep...they easily tow 3.5 tonne like all the others. They do it safely and frugally. Same as all the twin cabs....I,m off now to feed my unicorns..
AnswerID:
648576
Reply By: Batt's - Monday, Oct 06, 2025 at 18:25
Monday, Oct 06, 2025 at 18:25
There's more to it than thinking you can tow 3.5t something lots of people don’t look into.
Myself I personally think for light vehicle's we shouldn't be allowed to tow more than the manufacturers rated GVM specific to each vehicle for safety reasons, I've been driving trucks since 1990 and towing trailers etc with light vehicles since 1988.
I like the tow vehicle to have control over the load and not the other way around which is the norm these days.
AnswerID:
648577
Follow Up By: tim_c - Friday, Oct 17, 2025 at 12:07
Friday, Oct 17, 2025 at 12:07
I must admit that's my preference too, but I have to ask you as a truck driver, is that the way trucks are operated? All those semi-trailers and B-doubles... are the cabs really heavier than the trailers they're pulling?
FollowupID:
930041
Follow Up By: Batt's - Friday, Oct 17, 2025 at 18:33
Friday, Oct 17, 2025 at 18:33
Difference beast all together, no the semi truck/ cabin is usually lighter than the load but are specifically built for the purpose of towing loads that are much much heavier. Just look how over engineered their chassis are and a different more effective braking system and engine braking is better and aided by an exhaust brake etc.
FollowupID:
930044
Reply By: Batt's - Tuesday, Oct 07, 2025 at 11:09
Tuesday, Oct 07, 2025 at 11:09
Also I forget to mention the other issue Adblue which they use as the research says there have been issues with it also if you run out your not going anywhere. That could be from a leak in the system for example your in the
bush camping and wake up in the morning with a puddle of adblue under the car. It's shelf life is reduced in hot weather up to 35 degrees and above that should be tested before use that's what the research tells you.
Lucky it doesn't get hot in Australia huh. You'll have to add the extra cost to your fuel economy budget as some people do run to tight budget.
Plus your burning another chemical that actually does produce it's own toxic mix as
well that is supposed to be aiding the burning of diesel what the hell are they thinking.
Not trying to hijack the thread but one thing like making the chassis stronger doesn't necessarily mean the vehicle is better with all the other crap they have added.
AnswerID:
648579
Follow Up By: tim_c - Friday, Oct 17, 2025 at 12:24
Friday, Oct 17, 2025 at 12:24
I don't see how it's different to most other fluids in the car - run out (or leak it out and find it in a puddle under the car) and you're not going to be going anywhere, or at best, nowhere far.... fuel, oil, coolant, you name it
But as for burning another chemical to supposedly save the planet... welcome to the world of emissions controls! Does EGR really help in the long run when it causes the car to run less efficiently (which gets worse as it ends up choking up the air intake), and likely compromises the service life of the car (or at least the engine)? What about auto-stop/start systems which cause the engine to restart repeatedly each trip and therefore operate repeatedly with low (or no) oil pressure until the oil pump can build up the pressure again after each restart?
FollowupID:
930042
Follow Up By: Batt's - Friday, Oct 17, 2025 at 19:21
Friday, Oct 17, 2025 at 19:21
It's a vicious circle technology can be a killer of vehicle's just one more thing we don't need they keep adding but never take away so vehicles are getting heavier as
well which is a big negative for fuel econ. They don't won't your engine to last a million kilometres so they are designed to fail because it's all about money and not really about the environment as they claim. Look at how much stuff is thrown away these days using cheap electrical components that should last for decades and decades because of the years of development put into things.
Back in the mid 70's as an example the Holden 308 lost a bit over 10hp give or take due to the introduction of basic emissions systems that's not much but it was the start and it's been getting worse as the years go on.
Amazingly I can still drive an old torana around with the original engine without all the necessary pollution gear required these days ha go figure.
FollowupID:
930045