Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 23:06
I have had both 3l and 4.2. If outright reiability is not an issue, then get the 3 litre.
The 3 litres tows better.
The 3 litres goes better.
The 3 litre is nicer to drive.
The 3 litre will go anywhere a 4.2 will go.
The 3 litres uses heaps less fuel.
The 3 litre manual has optimal gearing (4.2 wagon is overgeared).
The 3 litre can overtake easily at highway speeds (the 4.2 cant).
The 3 litre is being used by hire companies, government bodies, cockies, NDC in all the remote locations of australia.
The 3 litre can run all day at 150 without overheating.
The 3 litre has a radiator that is protected from sticks when off road.
Longeivity of EGR'd 4.2's is not proven yet.
If you think a 3 litre needs a ditronic, then the 4.2 by comparison will need a complete new turbo and pipe system., and disabling of the EGR system as
well.
Just my experience from owning both.
Sean
FollowupID:
333827