Lubrication and Value for Money

Submitted: Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:03
ThreadID: 16002 Views:4769 Replies:11 FollowUps:18
This Thread has been Archived
I searched the forum and the Net and it is difficult to find independent oil tests with measurable results. Some oil suppliers have data to prove their oil is better than their competitors, however the competitors also have data to prove superiority as well.

You have to ask yourself what proven practical differences in wear or improved efficiency come from using certain 'high tech' oils and whether the cost is justified.

I know with my 2 Stroke outboard for example, that as long as the oil for mixing meets the set standard (and this is marked on the container) then it is OK for the motor. Having tried many 2S oils, there seems to be no difference in fuel use or engine reliability. However some of the expensive oils produce smoke that would kill mozzies many metres away. For interest, Shell Nautilus is the best drop for my 2S insofar as smoke is concerned and there no other noticeable difference.

If I'm going to be putting fresh oil and filter in my new TD 100 series every 5000km and I will ensure Toyota's recommendation oil rating, where is the benefit of using (say):
Castrol GTX 5 Litres @ $25.99;
Pennsoil same as above; or
MotorPro (KMart generic) 6 Litres @ $13.99?

I assume that the KMart MotorPro is the generic of a popular oil and is the same as that normally packaged (by that oil company).

I notice that the claimed benefits of some synthetics is that they last longer (more Kms), but the oil will always be changed at 5000.

I do believe that some aftermarket filters can be a bit average though. What brands are OK?

What opinions please?

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Michael - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:21

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:21
4wd monthly , September issue did some oil tests.. dyno tests,, said tiny difference, not worth worring about.......
AnswerID: 75010

Follow Up By: ev700 - Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:31

Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:31
Michael
That is what I was thinking only I am worried about the heat of the turbo.
EV700
0
FollowupID: 334971

Reply By: Howard T - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:22

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:22
Ive been using RX Super in my 80 series cruiser since I purchased it. This was on the advice of the Toyota Dealer. Fairly expensive but so are Toyota parts if you have to replace something in it.
I believe you get what you pay for.
AnswerID: 75011

Follow Up By: ev700 - Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:38

Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:38
Howard T
I think it is only a few dollars dearer than GTX for 5 litres.
EV700
0
FollowupID: 334972

Reply By: Bob Y. - Qld - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:28

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:28
ev700,

Why don't you stick with Shell, and use Rimula X 15W/40. It's available all over Oz, and is a good oil. We have been running it for years, in a number of tojo's, turbo as well as N/A, with no problems.

You could always buy a 60L drum from agent/depot, which would give you nearly 6 changes.

Hooroo...
Seen it all, Done it all.
Can't remember most of it.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 75013

Follow Up By: ev700 - Monday, Sep 06, 2004 at 23:38

Monday, Sep 06, 2004 at 23:38
Bob V
Thanks, having sat and thought about it this is probably the way I'll go.

I think I'll be getting some quotes on a centrifuge though - not to extend services but to keep things clean.
John
0
FollowupID: 335173

Reply By: MrBitchi - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:42

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:42
I find it hard to believe that you guys with deisels put up with 5000km oil change intervals. On top of the extra dollars you pay for a deisel over a petrol you have to put up with these seemingly excessive maintenance costs.
The average modern petrol engine 4wd has service intervals of 15000km, 3 times the deisel figure.
Y'all must have far too much money burning a hole in ya pocket...

To answer your question, ev700, at regular 5k change intervals I can't see that a more expensive oil would be of any benefit at all. If you were doing a lot of hard miles and longer change intervals then maybe, but for mine I'd save the dollars.

JMO.
AnswerID: 75016

Follow Up By: Utemad - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:49

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 13:49
Our F-250 diesels are 7500km intervals. New Rodeos are 10000km. I think Landrover diesels have even larger intervals.

Although I was reading my Rodeo owners manual the other day and it said that for the 2.8 t/d it was 5000km but 10000km if you used a specific oil.
0
FollowupID: 334841

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 14:45

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 14:45
When I had a petrol I changed the oil every 5000kms even though the recomendation was 10k. I have always belived that regular oil changes are the key to longivity.
There is no way that I would leave oil in my motor for 15k if I was planning on keeping the vehicle for any length of time. MHO.

Also, yeah diesel costs more per litre. To assume that it costs more to run a diesel because of that is neive.
I prefer my 12L per km rather than 20L per km thank you very much. Not to mention the better torque when off road.

But each to their own and I understand that petrol is a better option for some people. Can't judge a book by it's cover is all I'm saying.
0
FollowupID: 334850

Follow Up By: MrBitchi - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 14:59

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 14:59
One thing you do get with deisel is range. That I envy....

I change oils at the recommended intervals. If the manufacturer says 15K then 15K is good enough for me. They also recomend shorter intervals in harsh conditions so I take that into account as well. Normal highway and around town does not count as harsh conditions, therefore I consider 5K to be a very short interval, under those conditions.

If, however, changing the oil at more regular intervals brings you peace of mind, thats what you should do. Lifes too short to stress about it.

JMO.
0
FollowupID: 334855

Follow Up By: Utemad - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 15:06

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 15:06
I agree Jeff. The scheduled oil changes are for ideal operating environments. When you add beach work with its salty environments, fine dust, extremely hot or cold conditions, being loaded up or a combination of these and more. Then it would be prudent to change more regularly.

Mind you I'm a lazy fella when it comes to these things. I take my ute to be serviced however I do big things and fit accessories myself. I guess the reason being is that there are probably little things that I could not see developing into big things.
0
FollowupID: 334856

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 15:17

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 15:17
Yeah I used to do the same thing until they started stuffing that up too! I have reverted to doing it myself. I've been collecting (slowly) my own mechincal workshop. Hopfully some axel stands and a trolly jack for fathers day!!??
The surf's great though, the sump plug is just in line with the rear of the bash plate so you don't have to remove anything to get to it, you just lay down with your socket in hand, undo it, drain it, change the filter and whack some more oil in, once you've got used to doing it on your own truck you can getup on a satuday morning and change the oil before your first coffee! Takes no time at all. With a trolly jack I'll be able to do it on the little shopping trolly as well, save heaps of doe. Got the grease gun now, so just whack some grease in every 10k. Easy. Blow out the air filter with my expesnsive $99 GMC air compressot LOL.
0
FollowupID: 334858

Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 14:06

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 14:06
Hi ev700,

The best thing you can do for your vehicle is use the grade of oil recommended by the manufacturer and change the oil regularly.

Be aware of some of the cheaper (and dearer!!!) oils and the rating they have. Petrol engine oils have the designation "S" in front of the grade eg. "SJ", while diesel oils have a "C" designation in front of the grade eg. "CH".

While "S" grade oils say they can be used in light diesel engines, I would never do this (unless they also had a "C" rating as well. Also, I would not use a CG grade diesel oil (like Castrol GTX Diesel) as CG-4 oils have a lower ash content than either CF or CH grade oils.

Diesel engine oils have higher ash (detergent) content to accomodate the high soot and particulates that diesel engines generate. While some may use a petrol rated "S" oil in a diesel engine, I would not IMHO. I would use a specific diesel oil (Penrite, Shell, etc...).

I use Shell Rimula X (CH-4) and have done so for many years in my diesel vehicles. I also change my oil every 5,000kms, even though my current GU is rated to 10,000km changes. Its such cheap insurance for engine life that I simply do it as a matter of course.

Cheers

Captain
AnswerID: 75021

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 14:50

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 14:50
I have been using Shell Diesel Super 15w40 in the surf for the last 4 or 5 changes and am happy to report tthat the oil comes out nice and dirty.

??? some of you might say..

One of the main purposes of the oil in diesel engines is to clean out the crap that builds up including acids produced by sulfer. If your oil ain't comming out dirty then it ain't doing it's job.

The other thing to do is make sure that when you change your oil make sure the engine is warmed up so all that vegimite losens up and comes out, just don't burn you hands!

so you are not just changing the oil because it has broken down and is not an effective lubricant, you are changing it because it is getting saturated with crap and is no longer effeciant in it's cleaning dutys letting all sorts of nastys build up and fester in your motor.
Synthetic diesel oils may last 15,000kms without breaking down, but they may not be cleaning your engine effectivly.
0
FollowupID: 334852

Follow Up By: Davoe - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 17:52

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 17:52
Jeff, we had 2 utes we used underground one had the standard black oil when you checked it and the other had oil clearer than a gas powered vehicle. Kinda strange really, I often wondered why this was the only diesal engine I had seen with oil like that
0
FollowupID: 334874

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 17:56

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 17:56
Davoe, how bizzare, I wonder if they were using the same oil? I guess they would be in a fleet situation, strange...
0
FollowupID: 334875

Reply By: Bob H - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 15:09

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 15:09
Good on ya Jeff,

some sense at last. if oil aint dirty it aint doing its job. i use synforce oil and am now getting 24mpg instead of 22mpg in my 80 series. this includes around town and some h/way running with about 100k of towing my 1600kg van. oils aint oils, just be sure to do your research. some oils i definately wont use.

regards

bob
AnswerID: 75027

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 15:22

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 15:22
Acutally funny you should mention Synforce, Bob, as they are who recommended Shell to me, I always used to use Caltex with my petrols and started to on the diesels but when I asked them what they recommend Shell was "one of the good guys". I hate shell fuel, it sucks (well in WA anyway). My road bike wouldn't even run on it's premium and my shopping trolly pings like bstrd on normal shell ULP.
I would like to try Synforce but the freight to WA just pushes it a little out of the feasable price range for me. Shell I buy at my local autoone (1 minute drive form home) at $44 per 10L which seems reasonable. Certainly not worth drving halfway accross town to try and save a couple more dollars.
0
FollowupID: 334859

Reply By: Bob H - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 16:59

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 16:59
yea Jrff, funny they should say that, but i suppose they are realistic with the supply problems over there. i get mine from the local autoshop at Gatton (near Toowoomba - Qld) cheaper than the factory sells it for (at least according to one supplier in maryborough). In the 4x4 mag that tested synforce against SOME others the s/force did produce more power/torque which backs up the companys claims. lets face it, if we drive sensibly with the right foot, and use whatever we can to reduce our fuel consumption, wheather by oil, hi-clones,biodiesel etc than the bottom line ie that our pleasures remain just that bit more affordable.

regards

Bob
AnswerID: 75039

Reply By: Davoe - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 17:46

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 17:46
I had A simular query to this a while back in relation to repco oil vs the rest and the genarall consensus was that good quality oil was best but with nothing to back it up. It is my understanding that the most important function of diesal oil is to keep soot particles in suspension so the motor does not gunk up and wear prematurely. This is done by detergents in the oil which can be a kfc secret recipe if you believe some companys. The big problem is that to compare hte way oil allows your motor to wear is just about immposible to measure let alone the costs of such tests so my answer is I DUNNO except that you would hope you get what you pay for. A proper test was (supposedly) done by a 4wd mag in relation to better performance using oil which showed that different oils are not a performance enhancer
AnswerID: 75044

Follow Up By: Bob H - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 18:48

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 18:48
EXCEPT that synforce came out on top and penrite came out on the bottom. another way of putting it is that robs more performance than synforce. i just wish that more oils were tested to give a better indication.

regards

Bob
0
FollowupID: 334880

Follow Up By: Bob H - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 18:50

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 18:50
ooops, meant that penrite robs performance more than synforce and the other oils tested.
0
FollowupID: 334881

Follow Up By: Davoe - Saturday, Sep 04, 2004 at 11:08

Saturday, Sep 04, 2004 at 11:08
a thinner oil will create less resistance for the crank etc to plough through which may create a marginal differance to consumption power etc but would it be doing the correct job of a thicker oil? I very much doubt that it is the lubricating qualitys of the oil that results in the differance
0
FollowupID: 334921

Reply By: Peter 2 - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 19:18

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 19:18
I've always used RX super every 5k and changed the filter every second change as Toyota say on 1hz cruiser, and several 2h powered ones before that.
Oil is cheap compared to rebuilding engines.
On the 2h powered 75 series heat was always a problem, I spoke to tech at castrol re using GTX or similar and he said to keep using RX due to heat problem.
I don't think that ultimately brand is the decider rather quality, correct changes and clean fuel and air is the clue to engine longevity.
I often wonder about these 'extended' service intervals on modern engines, given they are 'cleaner' due to improved fuel and better oil filtration but they are also stressed much higher. I suspect that most of these modern engines would be a throwaway item down the track, not economically rebuildable like older designs.
Lets face it the manufacturer doesn't want you to keep a vehicle for 10 years they want to sell new ones!
AnswerID: 75057

Reply By: Member - Lindsay S (Int) - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 19:50

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 19:50
Once the basic manufacturers specification of the oil has been met there is little to choose between premium oils. As pointed out in several posts however the wear is seldom the result of metal to metal contact but is due to solid particles between sliding lubricated surfaces. Although modern oils keep particles in suspension there is a downside. Each time the oil filter by-pass valve opens this particle carrying oil takes a short trip through the system, this happens more often than you think, at cold start time etc. The shortened oil change periods are one way to minimise this damage but it is still what will wear the engine out in these areas. The best solution to this is a centrifugal oil filter. These are common on larger diesels and with oil capacities of several tons, short oil changes are not a good option. We all have accountants to deal with. The reason Land Rover can specify 20000 Km oil changes on the TD5 motor is because it is fitted with a centrifugal oil filter and the particle count at this service life is lower than that of a normal system at 1000Km. Cutting one of these open even after a fairly short mileage is the stuff of nightmares. The OEM supplier to Land Rover is Mann+Hummel. A trip to thier site is worth the visit. http://www.mann-hummel.com/index.html?iKeys=5.1.675.0.0
AnswerID: 75058

Follow Up By: ev700 - Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:30

Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:30
Lindsay S
I rang a LandRovermechanic who said the centrifugal filter was special to the Landie and combined with the usual high flow. He thought that connecting the Mann & Hummel to a 100 Series would be difficult because there was no access to the crankcase - although I did see on a website that for some vehicles it is possible to get a fitting to mount between the usual high flow and the crankcase wall.

Mann & Hummel have a suitable centrifugal filter, the question is how to mount it. Or failing that to put in a Racor bypass filter - again how is it mounted?
thanks
EV700

0
FollowupID: 334970

Follow Up By: Member - Lindsay S (Int) - Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 06:47

Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 06:47
Hi EV
I guess from your reply you have had a look at one of the Mann & Hummel websites. If you go to www.mann-hummel.com this is the main site. Select liquid filter systems from the menu on the left of the home page, next select informational material which is the last selection before the search on that page menu. Go to the bottom of the list which comes up and you will find a 12 page pdf in english called centrifugal cleaners. This contains the dimensions and fitting information on the FMO16 centrifuge. This is to my knowlege the smallest retrofit centrifuge made and has a disposable plastic rotor which sorts out the worst aspect of fuel centrifuges which is cleaning them.
I am not familiar with the LC100 engine in any detail. ( at the end of my apprenticeship many years ago, I was given the advise by my journeyman that if I was stupid enough to get involved with anything with less than a ten inch bore I deserved all the misery I got. This has largely proved to be true!) As mentioned in the Mann and Hummel information it is important to ensure the existing oil pump has a capacity 10% above its requirements, I would be surprised if it did not. Keep in mind that freer flowing oil such as the wide range multigrades take a fair bit of load off the pump and may be the difference in what you need. Keep also in mind that the flow charecteristics of the lubrication system will have been designed for the worst possible case, i.e. oil in poor condition combined with dirty and restricted filters. This condition will never be attained if a centrifuge is fitted. As an example we had occasion to have to run an engine with the centrifuge off line due to equipment failure and the 10 micron paper elements set off the differential alarm within 30 hours running time. Their normal run time is 2000hrs.
The FMO16 centrifuge is designed to be remote mounted. The feed should be a relatively simple matter and can be taken from a suitable connection on the oil gallery. If there are no spare plugs available you could tee in behind a pressure sender or somewhere. The drain may be more of a problem as it is important this is unrestricted and goes back into the motor above the oil level. It is also relatively large at 25mm.
The Racor is an option but can not hold a candle to a centrifuge. The principle is no better than the normal paper element and simply traps smaller particles, whearas the centrifuge takes out anything heavier than oil and cannot lose efficiency by blocking up unless it is allowed to fill up completely. The first time you cut one open will justify the cost and any trouble taken to fit it. Good luck with the project and if I can be of any further help please let me know.
0
FollowupID: 334976

Reply By: Martyn (WA) - Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 21:00

Friday, Sep 03, 2004 at 21:00
ev700,
I use BP C6 in my diesel and it seems quite happy, in one of the answers before there was mention of a standard CH-4 and also an API-4 standard if you look in your handbook the oil spec will be there. A lot of the oils will specify on the container meets or exceeds CH-4 or API-4 etc etc you can't go wrong as long as you check. I got in touch with Nissan about this oil spec because of the issues with the 3.0 litre TD engine, as long as you have evidence that you are using the correct oil which meets or exceeds the specified standard you will be right.
You get what you pay for is a valid statement to a point. Some vehicles like certain oils for some reason, my Rangie loves BP Coarse, nuff said, not as much as it liked Castrol Magnatec by the bucket full...................
Keep the shiny side up

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 75068

Follow Up By: ev700 - Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:54

Sunday, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:54
Martyn
Thanks and yes I'll go by the correct specification in the handbook. However you can do this much more economically with some brands of oil - however the jury seems to be out on whether or not the more expensive oils offer greater value for money (reduced wear and better performance).
EV700
0
FollowupID: 334973

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)