Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:27
Ok, if we read what they are really saying, in that survey article,
it says
"Four-wheel-drive owners are so arrogant and aggressive behind the wheel that 70 per cent of Australian motorists do not feel safe sharing the roads with them, a national survey reveals."
So what it means is, 70 percent of aus motorists feel 4wders are arrogant and aggressive, as it doesnt actualy prove 4wders are anything, it only asked opinions in a survey.
they said
"while 39 per cent of four-wheel-drive owners acknowledged their vehicles were probably dangerous to other motorists. "
We install smoke alarms, safety switches, pool fences, lollypop ladys on crossings, air bags, etc etc to look after our family, so what is wrong with driving a car which is the hammer, compared to the nail?
they said
"most drivers were not convinced they were safe for Australian roads. "
Interesting noa ctual No's quoted here from a survey where they can quote No's elsewhere, and again, they are asking people thier opinion on 4wds and safety, no factual data what so ever in this statement.
they said
"Ms O'Connor said the survey found most owners lived in the city. Only one-quarter listed their main reason for buying a four-wheel-drive as a desire to go off-road exploring."
Do we buy runners to go running? I didnt realise our rights to free choice meant we had to use the items we purchase for thier intended purpose.
they said
""Six in 10 drivers of regular vehicles said they believed four-wheel-drives should have special licensing requirements due to their different handling and safety considerations," she said. "
Interesting concept, given some 4wd's in the market are smaller, and lighter than passenger cars, the 90 prado for instance is the same weight as a statesman, with much less power, then we have suzuki's, hyundai's, softroaders, like the holden cross8, ad ford territory, which are same weight as prado, similar configaration to awd subaru's, so how do they police it?
they said
"Australian Transport Safety Bureau figures show that over the nine years to 1998, the number of fatal four-wheel-drive crashes rose by 85 per cent"
they quote a figure of deaths in 4wd's, without quoting the No's of 4wd sales increase in that period, or if it includes awd vehicles as
well, which would probably then show an 85% increase in fatalities may actually be a lower figure of deaths than the 9 yr previous, compared to sales.......
they said
"The committee chairman of Staysafe, Paul Gibson, said special licences for four-wheel-drive owners were being considered in NSW. "
Another way to increase insurance, license fee's, and revenue.......
A very one sided article, which , tells us more about the writers bias by its omissions, than its content, and a typical sensationalization by main stream media.
AnswerID:
78046
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:33
Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:33
"A very one sided article."
You expected Different ?? None of the other 129840213489203948 storys/polls etc were different to this.
FollowupID:
337610
Follow Up By: GO_OFFROAD - Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:42
Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:42
it was an observation, not a question, and as such, carried no expectation attached to it, which now puts you in the same vein as the writer of the article, by using data worded specifically to make the reader think differently to what the data says, and attempt to make your point.
FollowupID:
337612
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:58
Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:58
Yea I know it was an observation dude. Was just sayin the same thing really..
Would be nice if we could get some articles printed, or a few polls taken at the 4wd show sprouted around the country on TV/Radio/Press that showed the other side of the arguement, instead of taking a poll round Scrubys family reunion.
You finished movin house yet?
FollowupID:
337616
Follow Up By: GO_OFFROAD - Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:09
Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:09
Well,
this is where our 4wd acc and bodys need a radical element to gain press,a nd sprout info, and make people accountable for what they come out with, instead of being the toothless tiger............
And yep, 3 weeks of shifting stuff was enough....;-)
FollowupID:
337620
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:23
Tuesday, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:23
Couldnt agree more with the association... Like the ACCC - useless.
So whens the house warming BBQ?
FollowupID:
337633
Follow Up By: Kozzy - Wednesday, Sep 29, 2004 at 16:46
Wednesday, Sep 29, 2004 at 16:46
I drive a Subaru 4wd that'll go anywhere any other 4wd will go, and will even fit into a shopping centre
carpark space. What are they going to do with me? Maybe they will need to have about 20 different licenses depending on what kind of 4wd you drive, and whether you drive it on the road, off the road, tow an ocean liner, etc. etc.
It's a load of bull sheet! Teach people how to drive properly according to the conditions they will encounter - like all 4wd clubs do!! No wonder most people feel unsafe on the roads with 4wds, most people can't drive properly anyway! They also complain about buses, bicycles, pedestrians, motorcyclists.....crap!!
FollowupID:
337811
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:40
Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:40
"I drive a Subaru 4wd that'll go anywhere any other 4wd will go"
You cant honestly believe that.... Do you do stand up as
well?
FollowupID:
337867
Follow Up By: Kozzy - Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:51
Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:51
Ok, ok, I didn't mean to get into an argument. Let's say ALMOST anywhere.... but all the same, don't underestimate what a little suby in the right hands can do (with a few
well chosen mods). I wasn't being contentious, I was making a supportive point on your post. (All the same, it is worth a chuckle when you see how easily some people get into strife when they get too cocky about what they think their big 4x4 truck will do and they don't know how to drive it!)
FollowupID:
337868
Follow Up By: GO_OFFROAD - Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:19
Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:19
so what your really saying is, a good driver will take a bad car more
places than a bad driver will take a good car?.......
FollowupID:
337870
Follow Up By: Kozzy - Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:39
Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:39
Yes...or...a good driver will take ANY car to more
places than a bad driver will, and more safely!
FollowupID:
337875