Brand New Patrol : DEFINATELY 4.2TDi for towing a 1600kg Boat

Submitted: Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:13
ThreadID: 17161 Views:3847 Replies:12 FollowUps:18
This Thread has been Archived
I finally had a chance to test both the 3.0TD and 4.2TDi with the 1600Kg boat at the back and I must say I definately will be going for the 4.2TDi. The 4.2TDi felt like it was doing it more relaxed where as the 3.0 I found it was working more and the revs were definately higher. On the freeway doing 100km/h the 4.2TDi was revving at around 2100 while the 3.0TD was revving around the 2700 mark. With those figures its definately the 4.2TDi for me.

Cant wait for the 4x4 show this weekend at Jeffs Shed, see what deal I can do there with the new patrol :)

I don't know if I should go for the DX, ST or ST-S (with safety pack, abs etc)???

Cheers, John

ps. I also noticed that the 4.2TDi won the Best 4WD for 2004 in Nov issue (no. 73).
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Bjorn - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:16

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:16
that motor takes 100k to losen up too.
AnswerID: 80852

Follow Up By: GUPatrol - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:20

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:20
180000kms for mine!! I got 188thou in mine and it only just now it feels like it is loosening up...

Will
0
FollowupID: 340117

Follow Up By: Bjorn - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:26

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:26
amazing. the 4.2 must be one of the most fairdinkum donks ever dropped into a truck.
0
FollowupID: 340120

Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:17

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:17
Said that many times about the 4.2 doing it snoozier.

Deals at the 4wd show? LOL... Walk out the door now and battle 3 dealers against each other. Get a price off them, I'm sure that the best you get from them will toast what you can get at the show. Then throw that at the dudes at the show to beat or match... they will cringe. Also do a tire swap before you drive out the door, the Bridgeys are not the best.

Only you know how much $ to blow on which model.

PS. BMW X5 won 4wd of the yr too...
AnswerID: 80853

Follow Up By: Bjorn - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:23

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:23
Truckster,
I have yet to witness a forumite who replies as swiftly or often as you do!
0
FollowupID: 340119

Reply By: Bob H - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:23

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 14:23
John,

That was the standard version with the skinny tyres. On value for money out of the vehs tested it was the best. They did not test the TDI in the upper classes but did test the upper class in the petrol.
In my opinion the DX is probably the best buy if you dont really need the extra items that come in the ST or ST-S.
So long as you are happy with your purchase then that is really all that matters.

Happy driving

Bob
AnswerID: 80857

Reply By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 15:02

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 15:02
Gday mate,

Have you had a chance to look at the new model yet? Not a looker, that's for sure...and those tail lights...wow, they must be worth a packet.

Depending on your requirements, a DX "sweep out" model is sure to be easier on the pocket. And with Nissan have a run out on the 'old model', you'll be sure to have some luck regarding pricing.

You will get a DX 4.2TDI for less than 50k. That should include air con, wide wheel pack, all the plastic protection bits, snorkel, bullbar, towbar, lights and maybe even sand grabber mats depending on the salesman. If I was you, (which your not) but the underbody protection I reckon's worth it. Don't let them sting you $350.00 for tinting. If you were as keen as I, get the rust prevention, interior protection and paint protection. Don't pay full price for that either, they will cut a deal and will set you back around $900 instead of $1,400. You may even haggle that into the original price.

For the 7 or 8k you save, you can get those tyres, rims, suspension, sidesteps, locker, sheepskin seat covers, dual batteries etc.

But, if you like electric windows, leather bits, auto locking hubs etc, go for it! The DX even comes with cup holders. ;-)

I'm currently getting an average of 8.34 k's per litre since upgrading the donks power over nearly 7,000 k's. Top truck, super comfy compared to the GQ's with same motor and the 4.2's eventual resale value will be higher than the 3L due to lower sales. (IMHO)

Lastly, you can't tell the DX from the ST anymore as the only badge on the DX is the TD6 one on the rear barn door. With alloys, steps, tyres and lift, the only way is to check the hubs!

Cheers mate,

Chris.
AnswerID: 80868

Follow Up By: Peter O - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 21:45

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 21:45
Quote
"If you were as keen as I, get the rust prevention, interior protection and paint protection. Don't pay full price for that either, they will cut a deal and will set you back around $900 instead of $1,400. You may even haggle that into the original price. "

Or you could go and see the people that do all this stuff for the dealer and get an even better deal (offer cash), like I did
2 cars tinted(at the shade that I chose) for $650 (new Patrol and old Festiva)

If you don't ask you don't get
0
FollowupID: 340192

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:59

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:59
Very true Peter, you never know do you! What can they do? Say no? You don't lose anything from that...

I had my tinting done aftermarket as well, done by a pro who did it as a second income after working for a company all day, $150.00 cash. Darkest metalic tint and still with lifetime warranty...
0
FollowupID: 340217

Reply By: howie - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 15:13

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 15:13
agree with truckster,send a request for your 4.2 ,with all the fruit you want, to a fleet company and ask for a price. i saved $7000 this way, and i also had the great pleasure in knocking down a dealer $7000 off his price, and then told him to stick it.
ps dont sign ANYTHING until your happy with dealers,some of their docs are legally binding,make them squirm, good luck.
("fleetcare" was the company i used in w.a.)
AnswerID: 80870

Follow Up By: DARREN - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 17:14

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 17:14
Howie, (for future reference), what do you mean fleet co. Why/how do they price things for you, I thought they do only the lease thing if you have lots of vehicles?

Thanks in advance

Darren
0
FollowupID: 340145

Follow Up By: howie - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 21:49

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 21:49
i had a series I gu which was written off 4 years ago, a mate put me onto this firm "NBM fleetcare" 57 buckingham road, wangara, W.A.
i had the finance arranged already,5 year lease with a residual payment,
between me and StGeorge. i only have one car and although i do not have a registered company, i am self employed and have an A.B.N.
told NBM what i wanted,they give me a price.
vehicle $50657.
+ accessories- bar,snorkel,tow bar,bfg's etc -total price $51552
nissan dealer price(car with fruit) = $58750
haggling with nissan dealer- priceless
do not sign "contract to buy a new motor vehicle" unless your are going ahead.
ps thankyou, i found my spare key digging around my files for the info!
0
FollowupID: 340193

Reply By: Member - Sam (NSW) - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 16:07

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 16:07
All this talk of buying a 4.2 TDi and I can't afford one yet!!!! (either run out series III or the new, albeit a bit ugly, series IV)

Anyone care to donate funds to a worth cause ;-)
AnswerID: 80884

Reply By: don vale - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 18:31

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 18:31
Hi John, I just took possession of my new 4.2 4 weeks ago, and I agree - the 4.2 does the same as the 3.0, but does it easier. I got my 4.2 fully optioned to my specs, and I love it. I drove a 2.8 for five years and the series 3 4.2 just feels so strong.

As far as deals go, you may have trouble finding a run out 4.2 series 3. I know the dealers that I was going thru had trouble locating them, they only have white (which suited me). I agree with truckster - I got 3 dealers competing for my business and saved thousands. Also if you're a member of the nissan 4wd club of victoria - ferntree gully nissan give you a HUGE discount - well worth the joining fee.

Please feel free to give me a call if you need any more info/help on 0421 851 316.

ps the nissan club will have a stand at Jeffs shed this weekend too - well worth a look.
AnswerID: 80912

Reply By: Member - Jimbo (VIC) - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 19:21

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 19:21
John,

Did you try the 4.8 petrol? From all accounts it will pull the Queen Mary up a greasy ramp.

Sure, it's thirsty but if you fit LPG, cost around $2500 it will prove cheaper to run than a diesel. I believe Nissan are happy with fitting of LPG and it doesn't void your engine warranty.

Worth serious thought.

Good luck with whatever you get.

Jim.

AnswerID: 80923

Follow Up By: gareth - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:46

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:46
whats the power and torque end up at on gas?
0
FollowupID: 340220

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Thursday, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:27

Thursday, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:27
I don't know anything for sure about the 4.8 but if it's factory fitted I know holden and ford adjust the ECU to make a very very little difference in power output.
0
FollowupID: 340351

Reply By: sean - Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 21:10

Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 at 21:10
John

You have missed the most relevant part of the comparison between the 3 and 4.2.

They have different diff ratios as you have noted BUT the 3 litre gearing is actually BETTER than the 4.2 gearing.

4.2 in fourth is the same as the 3 litre in fifth but the 3 litre is NOT over reving. When you come to a hill or want to overtake the 3 litre ratios are better matched to the motor. I tried overtaking in my 4.2 on the weekend and fourth would not pull away (this is the same as fifth in teh 3 litre). So I changed to third and the revs went into redline and the motor became a brake. So I just sat back and decided well 10 minutes later arrival wont really matter that much. I have found that I have had to rev my 4.2 to the max on many occasions where I rarely had that problem with the 3 litre. The same situation would have the 3 litre being able to go down to fourth and accelerate to 140 fairly rapidly.

Why do you think so many people are changing the exhaust or powering up thier 4.2's and it aint cheap, and it affects reliablity. Its becuae its gutless.

They are both good vehicles, but dont be put off by the higher revs becuase with the 3 its actually an advantage and it makes it a better tow vehicle. I have towed a van with both for over 20,000 each and believe me, there is NO COMPARISON. In my experience the 3 litre manual is a much better tow vehicle. Thats not to say that the 3 litre is better overall, just depends on what you want to do and were you want to drive.

Sean

AnswerID: 80937

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:07

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:07
Agree with you mostly sean.

The TD6 is somewhat restricted by environmental controls. I'm the first to agree that it's gutless.

But...powerups are only undoing what Nissan has done to ensure they can continue using the TD42 motor ie. overfueling, E.G.R. etc. till 2006. Would the believe that whilst I'm running 3 psi more, the tech was still required to lean back the pump whilst tuning on the dyno.

The 4.2's run 9-10psi standard. Most who have the powerups done and I speak for myself currently go to 12psi. What you end up with is an extremely torquey vehicle that has lower end and high end torque with similar fuel economy, with lower revs. I think reliability has been proved even when powering up by many running 12-15 psi on the GQ TD42 motor for 100,000's of k's.

BUT...you can't get the 4.2 in auto and for all you towing pros, it's a hell of alot easier with an auto.

Cheers,

Chris.
0
FollowupID: 340218

Follow Up By: schevchenko - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 13:23

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 13:23
what do you estimate the kw/nm figures at 12psi?
0
FollowupID: 340268

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 13:31

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 13:31
Gday schevchenko

On mine:

Pre:

636ftLb of torque
105hp

Post powerup

950 ftLb of torque
155hp
115kw
428nm

Please note those figures are at the rear wheels, not the fly wheel.

Cheers mate,

Chris.
0
FollowupID: 340269

Follow Up By: schevchenko - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 13:43

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 13:43
cheers chris - what sort of work does that require? is it a screwdriver job while on the dyno thing? cost?
0
FollowupID: 340270

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 13:51

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 13:51
email me at cm@btlawyers.com.au and I'll explain the whole thing to you...
0
FollowupID: 340271

Follow Up By: JohnZA - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 14:26

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 14:26
"4.2 in fourth is the same as the 3 litre in fifth but the 3 litre is NOT over reving. When you come to a hill or want to overtake the 3 litre ratios are better matched to the motor"

When I was cruising at 100km\hr (both in 5th gear):
4.2Tdi revs where 2100rpm
3.0TD revs where 2650rpm

This tells me that the 3.0 is working alot harder. Go to 110-120km\hr and the 3.0 is at 3000rpm while the 4.2 was at 2300rpm. I thought diesels should ideally be around the 2100rpm when cruising along??????
Petrols love the high rev range stuff not diesels????
0
FollowupID: 340272

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 14:40

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 14:40
Gday mate,

"4.2 in fourth is the same as the 3 litre in fifth but the 3 litre is NOT over reving. When you come to a hill or want to overtake the 3 litre ratios are better matched to the motor"

Depends on their gearing mate. The beauty of the 3L reving at 2650 is that you are within the torque zone/boost zone of turbo allowing you to accelerate. The motor is smaller and more likely to rev higher. The old 2.8 TD revs at 3000rpms on the highway, of which my father out law owns and it has done over 200,000k's towing 60% of the time all around Australia with no problems. In fact, it is quite a quick beast and spends the majority of it's time in high 2's early 3000 rpms.

The big 6 will rev lower but requires a knock back to 4th especially if towing if you intend on overtaking, then allow at least 1k-2k's between you and the vehicle traveling the other way!

Petrols have a longer band at which they source their power, this is true. But with longer and higher revs in the big 4.8 comes bad fuel comsumption.

In the TD42, there has always been a huuuuuuuuuuuge gap between 2nd and 3rd, you'll be reving up around 3-3.5 rpms and you'll go to 3rd up a hill and no power will be the order of the day!

The only reason I stick to 4.2's is their proven reliability and bullet proof ness ness...You get what I mean. If the 3L proves itself over the next couple of years getting well over 400,000, that will put the 'knockers' in their place! ;-)
0
FollowupID: 340273

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Thursday, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:32

Thursday, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:32
JohnZA, because the 3.0L is a "Euro Diesel" with all it's electronically controlled jargin and pre ignition it is running at a lower compression ratio, I think around 17:1 vs your probally 21:1 in the 4.2. What does this mean, well it means it is happier to rev higher and will generally do less damage that the equiv. 4.2 revving higher, also it will generate more power that a higher compressions diesel at the high revs. That's why people say that they are like driving a petrol, because they kinda are. Of course your average petrol is probally running around 9-10:1 compression, but it's somthing that appears to have been overlooked in this discussion.
Preignition is where the 3.0L get's it's better imissions and excellent torque figures from. It's also why they are noisy buggers of things under low rev load.
0
FollowupID: 340353

Reply By: sean - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 20:21

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 20:21
Chris I agree entirely. We are talking about tow vehicles here and not outright reliability.

WIth regard to revs.

When I had my 3 litre I met a bloke who had a 4.2 and he towed everywhere in fourth to keep the revs up. At that time I went everywhre in fifth thinking this was better for my motor. I questioned his wisdom and he said that he had a 300hp tractor and the manual says that the motor must be operated at 2850rpm regardless of the gear, and he says that the motor has done thousands of hours, and for him, that was the only logically way to load up his 4.2 He also added that he had the MQ diesel that did over 300,000 kms before he sold it and he said he drove it everywhere at 3000rpm and it was good when he sold it.

So I simply cant see how the 3 litre motor can be working so much harder on the simple basis thats it doing more revs. Besides, my 4.2 ends up doing most of its life in fourth becuase it does not have sufficient power to pull the van in fifth. So either way, if you want lower revs for towing then maybe look at the petrol.

Sean

AnswerID: 81034

Reply By: Andrew from TrekTable - Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 21:11

Wednesday, Oct 20, 2004 at 21:11
Wow!

This one thread highlights how good this forum is. So much shared information I'm overloaded.

I currently have 3.0l Jackaroo which I bought exclusively for towing and it has done a fantastic job. We travel 600km each way to our fishing shack so overtaking ability is very important to me and I've found the jackaroo to be excellent. (I assume it has very good power to weight ratio compared to Patrols)

But it's getting abit long in the tooth so I've been thinking about a 4.2TDI so I find the towing comparison between 3l and 4.2l very interesting.

It seems I may have to factor in a powerup on the 4.2 which would give good towing ability plus proven (?) longevity.

I must say I'm pleasantly surprised by the prices being quoted. Chris M mentions sub $50k with quite a few options. Is that onroad?

Thanks for all the info. Keep it up.

Andrew

AnswerID: 81047

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Thursday, Oct 21, 2004 at 13:35

Thursday, Oct 21, 2004 at 13:35
sub 50 does not include onroads...BUT, it is a runout at the moment, should jump on the bandwagon and see what you can scam!
0
FollowupID: 340363

Reply By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Thursday, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:34

Thursday, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:34
Personally I like the idea of the 4.2, but two things turn me off, the lack of auto, and the extra price tag.
(not that I could buy one anyway!! LOL)
I'll still to my 1kz-te Surf!

PS. I can't change vehicles anyway, it's too much bloody hard work re fitting all the accessories! :->
AnswerID: 81083

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)