Friday, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:23
This thread may hopefully solve a number of electrical problems - particularly relating to 12 volt fridges.
Materials such as copper, that allow electricity to flow, are not perfect conductors. To varying degrees they oppose that flow. This opposition causes that conductor to heat up and that energy is lost.
The smaller the cross sectional area of the conductor, and the greater its length, the larger the loss.
A fuse has very small cross-sectional area, but of such short length, that the loss is not that great. The older-type glass fuses however can cause problems as the contact between the fuse and the fuseholder tends to corrode.
The major concern however is that raised by Klaus and others - and that relates to cable 'rating' standards.
Electrical appliance makers worldwide (except the USA) specify cable in terms of its cross sectional area (in sq. mm.). But when you set out to buy the (say) 4.0 or 6.0 sq mm cable called for, what you will almost certainly be sold is 4.0 or 6.0 mm auto cable.
For reasons that defy sanity, auto cable is sold with similar 'numbering' (eg. 3.0 mm. 4.0 mm, 6.0 mm) but that measurement is of its overall diameter - including the insulation.
The appliance maker logically specifies the cross sectional area of the copper that carries the current.
The auto cable maker specifies the size of the hole the cable can be pushed through - and uses the same bloody numbering!
This is not an error made by auto parts staff. It is the way the stuff is rated by its makers. I have however yet to find a single person in an auto parats store who is even vaguely aware of this matter - let alone its consequences.
Is those consequences serious?
You bet they are!
Because the ratio of copper/insulation varies from auto cable maker to auto cable maker there is no such thing as a universal comparison table.
Roughly though (and using the mosty common sizes available in Australia):
3.00 mm auto cable is about 1. sq mm.
4.00 mm auto cable is 1.8-2.0 sq mm.
6.00 mm auto cable is typically a tad under 4.6 sq mm.
As a very commonly used size is 4 mm, a HUGE number of fridges (probably most) are connected via cable that is, at best 50% undersized, and in many cases close to 60% undersized.
Using the correct size cable makes an enormous difference to performance.
Be aware also that the so-called 'current rating' (like 30 amp) is simply a measure of the current that cable can carry before the insulation melts. It bears no relationship to voltage drop.
The above affects a huge number of RV electrical installations including many done professionally.
I first raised this issue in an early edition of my book 'Motorhome Electrics' - I thought then that it was of concern, but only limited concern. It has turned out be a huge issue worldwide (except in the USA where a different cable rating system is used) - and a huge number of RVs are affected.
I am currently finishing a 'Guide to Solar' for publication on this
Forum - and I have covered this issue also in this.
Re single/multi-strand cable: multi-strand is necessary for anything that moves as it is very much more flexible. The current carrying capacity at dc and low frequency ac (such as mains voltage) is virtually identical, but at radio type frequencies and above, the ac current tends to travel on the outer surface of the copper hence multi-strand is used because of it massively larger surface area.
Trust this helps
Collyn Rivers
AnswerID:
82231
Follow Up By: Ian from Thermoguard Instruments - Friday, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:55
Friday, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:55
Good one, Collyn! This very
well explains the CSA Vs stupid automotive cable 'overall diameter' marking issue I was struggling with in a red-wine-induced haze, late last evening.
FollowupID:
341379
Follow Up By: G.T. - Monday, Nov 01, 2004 at 17:50
Monday, Nov 01, 2004 at 17:50
Given that 6.00mm auto cable is approx 4.6 sq mm, what size auto cable do you use to get 6.00 sq mm ? Thanks in advance. Regards G.T.
FollowupID:
341610
Follow Up By: G.T. - Monday, Nov 01, 2004 at 17:52
Monday, Nov 01, 2004 at 17:52
Sorry my follow up should have been addressed to Collyn. Regards G.T.
FollowupID:
341611
Follow Up By: Ian from Thermoguard Instruments - Monday, Nov 01, 2004 at 23:19
Monday, Nov 01, 2004 at 23:19
Hi GT,
I don't have a precise answer to hand, but you might also like to look at this Dick Smith Electronics page. It is a straight forward way to size cables for 12Vdc automotive/marine applications.
Hope this helps.
Ian
FollowupID:
341716