Friday, Nov 12, 2004 at 15:59
G'day Fusion,
Recently on the msn caravanners
forum there was a diesel Vs gas "discussion", where I was able to extract some real numbers (from www.justcruisin.bigpondhosting.com) over an 18,000 Km trip from
Adelaide to
Darwin, over to Broom,
Perth,
Albany and back to
Adelaide - from June to October this year with a 4.5L ST Patrol converted to LPG towing a 21Ft Jayco
Heritage van. See the calculations below - the vehicle choice being considered was a 4.5L Patrol dual fuel at $40K Vs 4.2L TD at $55K ...
"G'day again Baygypsy,
This is fascinating - and I read with interest Mick & Sally's (JustCruisin) response as I was an avid follower of their recent "Big One" - especially as I bought a '99 4.5 Patrol Ti at 88K Km to pull my (ordered) Jayco
Heritage like theirs, and had it converted to LPG, but unlike JustCruisin, had a long range petrol tank (75L) added to keep me out of trouble, rather than keeping the 37L sub tank. $36,000 converted, including electric brakes and HR WDH.
If you go to the web site and look at JustCruisin Trip Costs and Fuel Costs everywhere along the way (Adelaide/Darwin/Broome/Perth/Albany/
Adelaide), you will see:
Avg LPG: $0.685/L
Avg Diesel: $1.19/L (and for interest, ULP $1.181)
Distance travelled on LPG 18,178 Km at average of 3.19 Km/L LPG at a cost of $3,988.
Diesel Km/L to equal this cost gives 5.4Km/L (3351L at $1.19)
NRMA road
test on Patrol 4.2 TD (April, 2003) shows avg
test diesel usage at 7.75 Km/L (12.9L/100Km) - unladen.
It is not unreasonable to assume with a 2T van on the back that consumption might drop to say 6.75Km/L.
If this were true, then over the 18,178Km, 2693 L of diesel would be used at $1.19/L equates to $3204 - a saving on the LPG of $783 for the trip.
BUT the diesel costs (as you say) $15,000 more to buy - so you will have to travel
(15,000/783) x 18,178 = 348,000 Km to get a payback!!!
The numbers tell a story, presuming the asumption of 6.75Km/L diesel with van is correct! If they were worse than that, the payback would be even longer. Interesting what?
When I purchased the Patrol Ti (and I like the comforts it offers over the ST) I calculated I would need to drive 28K Km normal driving or 17K Km with a van to pay back the LPG conversion and long range petrol tank cost of $3,300 - and anything above that is money in the bank!"
While "JustCruisin" had to use petrol on a few occasions, notably when it got too hot for the LPG to load(!), LPG would seem to offer a level of fuel economy - and in my own Patrol Ti, I really can't notice the difference when driving - and as mentioned, I've added a 75L Petrol tank in place of the sub tank to give extra range when needed.
What do you think?
LPGPete
AnswerID:
84123
Follow Up By: Fusion - Friday, Nov 12, 2004 at 16:25
Friday, Nov 12, 2004 at 16:25
LPGPete,
You're killing me. Just when I think I'll go Diesel, you come back at me with a real beauty. I've been looking into Petrol with LPG conversion for the last couple of days. I'm leaving right now to go and
test drive the Petrol, which I haven't driven before.
I'll let you know how I go.....
Thanks,
Aaron.
FollowupID:
342992
Follow Up By: gonebush - Friday, Nov 12, 2004 at 17:41
Friday, Nov 12, 2004 at 17:41
"BUT the diesel costs (as you say) $15,000 more to buy - so you will have to travel
(15,000/783) x 18,178 = 348,000 Km to get a payback!!!
That is true assuming that the petrol and diesel have the same residual value some time down the track, and therefore you have lost the $15,000 price difference. That is not necessarily the case because if both vehicles were looked after equally, the diesel would be worth more than the petrol, and this is how it happens in real life Therefore the 'break even' kms are a lot less than 348,000.
Servicing costs also come into it (higher for the diesel normally) so a 'whole of life' costing is the only objective way to make a relative and valid costs comparison.
FollowupID:
343001
Follow Up By: Patrol22 (Queanbeyan - Saturday, Nov 13, 2004 at 09:25
Saturday, Nov 13, 2004 at 09:25
Don't forget to factor in the "availability" problem for LPG and now increasingly ULP in many outback
places. It is one thing if you are staying on the black top towing a caravan - most larger towns will have LPG but don't expect to get LPG on
Cape York and other like remote
places.
One other thing (and I may have misread some of these posts) but the big benefit of diesel is that your maximum torque is available at much much much lower RPM.
Cheers
Pete
FollowupID:
343034
Follow Up By: LPGPete - Monday, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:04
Monday, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:04
G'day Gone Bush and Patrol22,
You both make very valid points indeed ...
If the difference in re-sale was say $10,000 i.e. a cost difference of only $5,000 (rather than $15,000 in my example) after taking off the extra service costs of the diesel (and I'm being fairly generous here), the payback would require only 116,000 Km.
It's a pity, but for some reason the comforts of the Ti (for old bones - and the same goes for Cruisers) are not offered in the diesel models, but if they were and money wasn't an option, then it'd be diesel every time - but second hand diesels are a bit hard to find, 'cause mostly those who have 'em love 'em.
Cheers to all.
LPGPete
FollowupID:
343189