Deep cell batteries ?

Submitted: Wednesday, Nov 24, 2004 at 21:09
ThreadID: 18070 Views:3494 Replies:4 FollowUps:6
This Thread has been Archived
can anybody explain to me the benefits over a standard battery and what the expected life of these batteries is ?

Do they require different maintenance and can I change my soon to be new shape T/D Hilux over to one of these batteries without warranty issues ?

thanks in advance .
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: David Au - Wednesday, Nov 24, 2004 at 21:25

Wednesday, Nov 24, 2004 at 21:25
BackTracks deep cycle batteries are designed to supply low currents over a long period and not at all suitable for starting vehicles.
Batteries fitted standard in vehicles are designed to supply high cranking amps for a short time and not at all suitable for use as a deep cycle battery.
You can see the range of batteries and full information available at Car and Deep Cycle Battery FAQ
AnswerID: 85789

Follow Up By: Crackles - Wednesday, Nov 24, 2004 at 23:33

Wednesday, Nov 24, 2004 at 23:33
Dave. Suggest you read the article you are recomending.

"Using a deep cycle battery as a starting battery."
"There is generally no problem with this, providing that allowance is made for the lower cranking amps compared to a similar size starting battery. As a general rule, if you are going to use a true deep cycle battery (such as the Concorde) also as a starting battery, it should be oversized about 20% compared to the existing or recommended starting battery group size to get the same cranking amps.
On the other hand, many cars, boats, and RV's are more heavily loaded with power sucking "appliances", such as megawatt stereo systems etc. that are more suited for deep cycle batteries. We have been using the Concorde SunExtender AGM batteries in most of our vehicles for some time now with no problems"
I have also fitted 2 deep cycles to my cruiser doing away with the starting battery & it's the best system I've ever had. Runs the winch for extended periods & I can camp for 4 days then still start the car.
Deep cycle not suitable as a starting battery, just an old wives tale.
Cheers Craig..............

0
FollowupID: 344361

Reply By: Back tracks- Thursday, Nov 25, 2004 at 06:35

Thursday, Nov 25, 2004 at 06:35
thanks for the help guys . So I can use them.

Good news.
AnswerID: 85825

Follow Up By: Member - Collyn R (WA) - Thursday, Nov 25, 2004 at 13:28

Thursday, Nov 25, 2004 at 13:28
Re deep cycle batteries. This is not an 'old wives tale'.

Conventional starter batteries and deep cycle batteries have quite different internal construction and are designed and intended for totally different purposes.

If a deep cycle battery is large enough it may well have enough grunt to start an engine but it will be damaged internally if this is done often. Likewise a starter battery will be quickly wrecked if deeply discharged more than a few times.

AGM batteries have quite different internal construction that enables most of them to be used for either purpose - but even with these, some AGM makers supply two different types - one for starting, one for deep cycle.

With respect, it is misleading to extend experience with AGM batteries to deep cycle batteries generally.

Gel cell batteries however can be used for either purpose.
Collyn Rivers
0
FollowupID: 344449

Follow Up By: Crackles - Friday, Nov 26, 2004 at 09:25

Friday, Nov 26, 2004 at 09:25
Many of the group I travel with have been hard wiring (just a key switch) deep cycles to the starting battery for many years & get about 4 years life. We went this way due to the many failures of the solinoid & electronic isolator systems. It was suggested to me by a knowledgable guy in the solar industry that to maximise battery life I should only connect batteries of the same age, size & construction in the one circut, so seeing I'd had no failure issues with starting off the Deep cycles so far, I decided to join 2 115 amph Trojans together & do away with the starting batt all together. As the batteries approach 2 years old I was wondering Collyn when I should expect the internal damage?
Now if this little experiment does fail soon I will eat my humble pie & let you all know ;-)
Cheers Craig...........

0
FollowupID: 344578

Reply By: Member - Collyn R (WA) - Friday, Nov 26, 2004 at 15:39

Friday, Nov 26, 2004 at 15:39
Craig
In my published books, magazine articles and responses to queries on websites, I try to provide answers that will work - not that may work. But there will often be exceptions that suit some people or some circumstances.

Re charging disparate batterises from a common source. There's no problem charging different capacity batteries of a similar type. Each draws whatever it requires.

There can be a problem when charging starter and deep cycle batteries in parallel however in that a starter battery is recharged (after starting an engine) in no more than two-three minutes - and will have 14.2-14.4 volts across it. This causes the voltage regulator to cut back the charge and hence the deep cycle batteries may take longer to charge than expected.

The Rotronics unit gets around this by charging the deep cycle battery (or auxiliary battery) separately, but as the alternator is limited to starting battery type output the second battery will not charge beyond 70%.

Re using deep cycle batteries for starting purposes. Given a big enough battery bank there's no problem. It's also less of a problem with a petrol engine as far less cranking current is required. If the engine is in really good shape and starts within a second or so then what you are doing is to 'pull the surface charge from the plates'.

But when that is exhausted (the time varies from battery to battery but is short) the very slow electro-chemical reaction between the limited plate surface area of a deep cycle battery and the electrolyte will reduce available current. As such batteries have high internal resistance, attempting to do so will generate a great deal of internal heat and plate damage will inevitably ensue.

There may also be problems starting at very low temperature as the available current is greately reduced.

Re battery longevity - Trojan batteries are likely to withstand this usage better than most - but I maintain that their life span in this usage will be less than for their intended use.

I feel that in matters such as this, it's interesting to hear of exceptions - but they are best seen as such.

I know that you are not recommending this, but there is a similar situation with the occasional posting to the effect that a second (isolated) battery is 'not necessary'. Perhaps not in some instances, and where a jump start can be relied upon, but suggesting this as a general principle is unfair to many readers who may act on the advice.

Whilst researching my book 'Motorhome Electrics' I contacted almost every leading battery maker worldwide for advice. There was general agreement on most matters and it was on that 'averaged advice' that I wrote that part of the book. Prior to publication, draft copies of the battery content were sent to about 20 of the companies - and all approved the copy. My responses on forums such as this reflect this.
Collyn Rivers







AnswerID: 86027

Follow Up By: Richard & Leonie - Saturday, Nov 27, 2004 at 21:33

Saturday, Nov 27, 2004 at 21:33
Collyn
It appears to me from what you are saying that standard vehicle alternators will not fully charge a dual battery system, particularly so if the second battery if it is a deep cycle.

Is it possible then to upgrade the alternator to overcome this problem?

My simple retired mind tells me in respect to using a deep cycle battery to start are car is that it should. The power drain to do this is nearly as much as the power drain starting an electric forklift truck from stationary with 1 tonne load on it. Is my logic wrong? If it is not then surely a deepcycle battery should last in both the car and the forklift considering how many starts a forklift will get each day.

Let me stress the only thing I know about electricity is that is hurts and can easily kill you.
0
FollowupID: 344794

Follow Up By: Member - Collyn R (WA) - Sunday, Nov 28, 2004 at 13:24

Sunday, Nov 28, 2004 at 13:24
Richard & Leonie

Whilst vehicle electrics are not that complex there are few traps.

Charging batteries beyond 70% is one of them.

Increasing alternator capacity will enable a battery to be charged quicker - but still not beyond 70%. (It was in fact the discovery of this, in about 1995 that caused me to research and start writing 'Motorhome Electrics').

What happens is this: alternator output is controlled by an associated voltage regulator that in turn is governed by the battery voltage. When the battery reaches 14.2-14.4 volts on charge the regulator cuts the charge voltage right back - regardless of the size of the alternator.

It is possible to obtain a higher voltage regulator (enabling batteries to reach 14.7 volts and about 85% charge, but these are not compatible with computer engine management systems. It is also possible to use a three-stage 'smart' regulator (I have one on our OKA) but again these cannot be used with vehicle computer systems.

The only satisfactory solutions are to use AGM batteries (which charge close to 100% from 14.1 volts), or solar (which will take a battery right up top 100%).

Re fork lifts - these normally use big capacity traction batteries. Traction batteries have the ability to deliver the grunt needed to drive the motors in fork lift trucks - they are not usually straight deep cycle batteries.

Despite the above, even these traction batteries are not intended to be discharged at remote starter motor current levels. For example the typically used 465 am/hour unit is rated at a max draw of only 80 amps - this in fact is under the 25% of amp/hour capacity max recommended by deep cycle battery makers.
Collyn Rivers
0
FollowupID: 344858

Reply By: Member - John- Sunday, Nov 28, 2004 at 00:32

Sunday, Nov 28, 2004 at 00:32
BackTracks,

Collyn is right (in fact he is a bloody guru on this subject ... buy his books!)

I managed to wreck two deep cycle batteries in less than 12 months each when connected across the typical alternator/ cranking battery via an ARB Isolator in my work Nissan. Went back to using a cranking battery for Aux use in this situation and they work fine and are much cheaper.

Deep cycle batteries only work well when they are charged the way they like it (which is exactly what your typical alternator does NOT do). Solar charge controllers or specialised alternator regulators or the Arrid chargers are the only ways that will work and give you many years of life from a deep cycle battery.

JohnS

AnswerID: 86180

Follow Up By: Member - Collyn R (WA) - Sunday, Nov 28, 2004 at 13:27

Sunday, Nov 28, 2004 at 13:27
John
Your comments re charging are spot on.
Collyn
0
FollowupID: 344859

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)